Abstract
Global environmental science, in its current configuration as predominantly interdisciplinary earth systems analysis, owes its existence to technological development in three respects. (1) Environmental impacts of globalization of corporate and military industrial development linked to widespread use of new technologies prompted investigation of ways to understand and anticipate the global nature of such impacts. (2) Extension of the reach of technology itself demands extension of attempts to anticipate and control the environment in which the technology is to function. Thus as the reach becomes global, the environment in question is also global. (3) Such global studies cannot get far without the development of command, control and information technologies (computers, satellites, automated remote sensing devices) which are crucial for data gathering, storage, and analysis and for the simulation modeling, crucial to theory testing and prediction. This network of dependence on technological development gives the global environmental sciences a rather distinctive epistemological profile, one in which some distinctions that we had thought were clear, on the basis of models of classic laboratory sciences (such as those between experiment and deduction or representation and instrument), turn out to be far from clear. In consequence there needs to be a careful evaluation of the extent to which, or the ways in which, these sciences can provide bases for policy decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benacerraf P. Putnam P. (1964) Philosophy of mathematics: Selected readings (2nd ed) 1983. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bugman H.K.M. (2003) Predicting the effects of climate change. In: Canham Charles D., Cole Jonathan J., Lauenroth William K. (eds) Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 385–409
Copeland, B.J. (eds) (2004) The essential Turing: The ideas that gave birth to the computer age. Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York
Cortada J.W. (1993) Before the compute: IBM, NCR, Burroughs, & Remington Rand & the industry the created. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 1865–1956
Fletcher N.H. (1969) The physics of rain clouds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 329–343
Gallison P. (1997) Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hilbert, D. (1926). Über das Uendliche, Mathematische Annalen Vol. 93. Translated as “On the Infinite” by E. Putnam & G.J. Massey in Benacerraf and Putnam, 1964 and 1983 and by S. Bauer-Mengelberg & D. Føllesdal in van Heijenhoort 1967.
Hubbard J.H. (1999) The forced damped pendulum: Chaos, complication and control. The American Mathematical Monthly. 106(8): 741–758. doi:10.2307/2589021
Kirsch S. (2005) Proving grounds: Project plowshare and the unrealized dream of nuclear earthmoving. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ and London
Lorentz E.N. (1993) The essence of chaos, Chap 4. University of Washington Press, Seattle
MacKenzie D. (1996) Knowing machines: Essays on technical change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London
Monmonier M. (1999) Air apparent: How meteorologists learned to map, predict, and dramatize the weather. Chicago University Press, Chicago and London
Müller P., VonStorch H. (2004) Computer modeling in atmospheric and oceanic sciences building knowledge. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Milan, Paris, Tokyo
Norton, S. D., & Suppe, F. (2001). Why climate modeling is good science. In: A. Miller & P. Edwards Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Oreskes N., Frechette K., Belitz K. (1994) Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263: 641–644
Shackley S., Wynne B. (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change acience and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, Technology & Human Values 21(3): 274–302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302
Teller, E. (with Allen Brown) (1962). How to be an optimist in the nuclear age. In: The legacy of Hiroshima. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.
Tiles M. (1999) Balancing acts: Rational agency and efficacious action. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13(3): 289–300. doi:10.1080/02698599908573627
Tiles, M. (2005). Technology, science and inexact knowledge: Bachelard’s non-Cartesian epistemology. In: Gary Gutting (Ed.) Continental Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA, USA; Oxford, UK; Victoria Australia: Blackwell Publishing.
Turing, Alan (1947). Lecture on the automatic computing engine. Lecture notes reprinted in Copeland 2004.
van Heijenhoort J. (eds) (1967) From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic (1879–1931). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
von Neumann, J. [1951](1961)Various techniques used in connection with random digits. In: A. H. Taub (Ed.), Von Neumann: Collected works 5, pp. 768–770. London: Pergamon. First published in Monte Carlo Method, A. S. Householder, G. E. Forsythe & H. H. Germond (Eds.), pp.36–38. National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, no. 12. Washington, DC: U S Government Printing Office.
von Neumann, J. (1955). Can we survive technology? Fortune 51: pp.106–108, 151–152. Reprinted in Von Neumann: Collected works, A. H. Taub (Ed.), 6: pp.504–519. London: Pergamon, 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tiles, M. Technology and the possibility of global environmental science. Synthese 168, 433–452 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9448-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9448-x