Abstract
In this paper, I distinguish between two varieties of actualism—hardcore actualism and softcore actualism—and I critically discuss Ross Cameron’s recent arguments for preferring a softcore actualist account of the truthmakers for modal truths over hardcore actualist ones. In the process, I offer some arguments for preferring the hardcore actualist account of modal truthmakers over the softcore actualist one.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams R.M. (1974) Theories of actuality. Nous (Detroit, Michigan) 8: 211–231. doi:10.2307/2214751
Baldwin T. (1996) There might be nothing. Analysis 56: 231–238. doi:10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00231.x
Borghini A., Williams N. (2008) A dispositional theory of possibility. Dialectica 62: 21–41. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01130.x
Cameron R. (2006) Much ado about nothing: A study of metaphysical nihilism. Erkenntnis 64: 193–222. doi:10.1007/s10670-005-3637-5
Cameron R. (2008) Truthmakers and modality. Synthese 164: 261–280. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9225-2
Cameron, R. (forthcoming). On the source of necessity. In B. Hale, R. Cameron, & A. Hoffman (Eds.), The logic, epistemology, and metaphysics of modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis D. (1973) Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford
Mondadori F., Morton A. (1976) Modal realism: The poisoned pawn. The Philosophical Review 85: 3–20. doi:10.2307/2184252
Mumford S. (1998) Dispositions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schaffer, J. (forthcoming). The least discerning and most promiscuous truthmaker. The Philosophical Quarterly.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Contessa, G. Modal truthmakers and two varieties of actualism. Synthese 174, 341–353 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9456-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9456-x