Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to ‘Ontic Structural Realism’ (OSR), physical objects—qua metaphysical entities—should be reconceptualised, or, more strongly, eliminated in favour of the relevant structures. In this paper I shall attempt to articulate the relationship between these putative objects and structures in terms of certain accounts of metaphysical dependence currently available. This will allow me to articulate the differences between the different forms of OSR and to argue in favour of the ‘eliminativist’ version. A useful context is provided by Floridi’s account of the relationship between ‘ontic’ and ‘epistemic’ structural realisms and I shall conclude with some brief remarks on possible extensions of OSR into other scientific domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Busch J. (2003) What structures could not be. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao T. (2003) Structural realism and the interpretation of quantum field theory. Synthese 136: 3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cei A., French S. (2006) Looking for structure in all the wrong places: Ramsey sentences, multiple realizability, and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 633–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J., O’Malley M. (2007) Metagenomics and biological ontology. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 28: 834–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington A. (1928) The nature of the physical world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld M., Lam V. (2008) Moderate structural realism about space–time. Synthese 160: 27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L. (2008) A defence of informational structural realism. Synthese 161: 219–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L., Sanders J.W. (2004) The method of abstraction. In: Negrotti M. (eds) Yearbook of the artificial nature culture and technology. Models in contemporary sciences. Peter Lang, Bern, pp 177–220

    Google Scholar 

  • French S. (2006) Structure as a weapon of the realist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S. (forthcoming a). How much metaphysics should the realist take with her tea.

  • French, S. (forthcoming b). Metaphysical underdetermination: Why worry? Synthese.

  • French, S. (forthcoming c). Shifting to structures in physics and biology: A prophylactic for promiscuous realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences.

  • French S., Krause D. (2006) Identity in physics: A historical, philosophical and formal analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • French S., Ladyman J. (2003a) Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese 136: 31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S., Ladyman J. (2003b) Between platonism and phenomenalism: Reply to Cao. Synthese 136: 73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S., & Ladyman, J. (forthcoming). In defence of ontic structural realism. In A. Bokulich & P. Bokulich (Eds.), Scientific structuralism. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. New York: Springer.

  • French S., Redhead M. (1988) Quantum physics and the identity of indiscernibles. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, R., & Votsis, I. (forthcoming). Structuralism in philosophy of science.

  • Hellman G. (2001) Three varieties of mathematical structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 9: 184–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman J. (1998) What is structural realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J. (2007a). Structural realism. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/. (Revised 2009).

  • Ladyman J. (2007) On the identity and diversity of individuals. The Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman J., Ross D. (2007) Everything must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnebo Ø. (2008) Structuralism and the notion of dependence. Philosophical Quarterly 58: 59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Loux M. (1978) Substance and attribute. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E. J. (1998) The possibility of metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (2005). Ontological dependence. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dependence-ontological/.

  • MacBride F. (2006) What constitutes the numerical diversity of mathematical objects? Analysis 66: 63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morganti M. (2004) On the preferability of epistemic structural realism. Synthese 142: 81–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller F., Saunders S. (2008) Discerning fermions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59: 499–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, H. R. (1971 [1993]). Correspondence, invariance and heuristics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 213–255. (Reprinted from Correspondence, invariance and heuristics: Essays in honour of Heinz Post. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 148, pp. 1–44, by S. French & H. Kamminga, Eds., 1971, Dordrecht: Kluwer).

  • Psillos S. (1999) Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos S. (2001) Is structural realism possible? Philosophy of Science 68(supplementary volume): S13–S24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos S. (2006) The structure, the whole structure and nothing but the structure? Philosophy of Science 73: 560–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reck E., Price M. (2000) Structures and structuralism in contemporary philosophy of mathematics. Synthese 125: 341–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J. (eds) (2006) Structural foundations of quantum gravity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross D. (2008) Ontic structural realism and economics. Philosophy of Science 75: 732–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders S. (1993) To what physics corresponds. In: French S., Kamminga H. (eds) Correspondence, invariance and heuristics: Essays in honour of Heinz Post. Boston studies in the philosophy of science Vol. 148. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 295–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders S. (2006) Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 66: 52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (1997) Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel J. (2002) ‘The relations between things’ versus ‘the things between relations’: The deeper meaning of the hole argument. In: Malament D. (eds) Reading natural philosophy: Essays in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics. Open Court, Chicago, pp 231–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpson C. (2008) Philosophical aspects of quantum information theory. In: Rickles D. (eds) The Ashgate companion to the new philosophy of physics. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 197–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen B. C. (1991) Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen B. C. (2008) Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace D. (2003) Everett and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34: 87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99–124. (Reprinted from The philosophy of science, pp. 139–165, by D. Papineau, Ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Steven French

Authors
  1. Steven French
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven French.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, S. The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence. Synthese 175 (Suppl 1), 89–109 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9734-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9734-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation