Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ambiguous figures and representationalism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macpherson (Nous 40(1):82–117, 2006) argues that the square/regular diamond figure threatens representationalism, construed as the theory which holds that the phenomenal character is explained by the nonconceptual content of experience. Her argument is the claim that representationalism is committed to the thesis that differences in the experience of ambiguous figures, the gestalt switch, should be explained by differences in the NCC of perception of these figures. However, with respect to the square/regular diamond and some other ambiguous figure representationalism fails to offer a unified account of how representational content makes them ambiguous. In this paper, I aim, first, to offer a representationalist account of ambiguous figures and, second, to examine and rebut Macpherson’s arguments. My main point is that in each ambiguous figure Macpherson discusses there are differences in representational content that can explain differences in phenomenal character or content. The representational differences are due to the ways the Cartesian frame of reference in which perceptual content is always cast cuts the figure, underlying different properties of the figure with respect to the axes of the Cartesian frame of reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelle S. (1972) Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin 78: 266–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attneave F. (1971) Multistability in perception. Scientific American 225: 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A. (1995) Working memory. In: Gazzaniga M. S. (eds) The cognitive neurosciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez J. L. (1995) Nonconceptual content: From perceptual experience to subpersonal computational states. Mind and Language 10(4): 333–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (2007). Two neural correlates of consciousness. In Consciousness, function, and representation, collected papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Boynton G. M. (2005) Imaging orientation selectivity: Decoding conscious perception in V1. Nature Neuroscience 8(5): 541–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. (2002) Reference and consciousness. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Valois R. L., Yund E. W., Hepler N. (1982) The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research 22: 531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S., Kerszberg M., Changeux J.P. (1998) A neuronal model of global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 95: 14529–14534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S., Naccashe L., Le’ Clec’H G., Koechlin E., Mueller M., Dehaene-Lambertz G., van de Moortele P.-F., Le Bihan D. (1998b) Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 395: 597–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone R. (1999) Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. In: Humphreys G. W., Duncan J., Treisman A. (eds) Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. (1997) Naturalizing the mind. MIT University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver J., Baylis G. S. (1996) Eye-assignment and figure-ground segregation in short-term visual matching. Cognitive Psychology 31: 248–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans M. A., Shedden J. M., Hevenor S. J., Hahn M. C. (2000) The effect of variability of unattended information on global and local processing: Evidence from lateralization at early stages of processing. Neurophysiologia 38: 225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque D., Grossi G., Thornton I. M., Neville H. J. (2003) Representation of change: Separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(4): 491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante D., Gerbino D., Rock I. (1997) The right angle. In: Rock I. (eds) Indirect perception. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster D.H., Ward P.A. (1991) Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 243: 75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furmanski C. S., Engel S. A. (2000) An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 3: 535–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale M. A., Milner D. A. (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 15: 20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J.-D., Rees G. (2005) Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Current Biology 15(14): 1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg J., Peterson M. A. (1987) Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116: 370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth A., Henderson J. M. (2004) Sustained change blindness to incremental scene rotation: A dissociation between explicit change detection and visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics 66(5): 800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson F. (1977) Perception. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob P., Jeannerod M. (2003) Ways of seeing: The scope and limits of visual cognition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamitani Y., Tong F. (2005) Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 8: 679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata N. (1986) Attention and depth perception. Perception 15: 563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata N., Yamagami K., Noaki M. (1978) Visual fixation points and depth perception. Vision Research 18: 853–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto M., Revonsuo A. (2004) Preconscious analysis of global structure: Evidence from masked priming. Visual Cognition 11(1): 105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge D. (2000) Networks of attention. In: Gazzaniga M. S. (eds) The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold D. A., Logothetis N. K. (1996) Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379: 549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long G. M., Toppino Th. C. (2004) Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 130(5): 748–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson F. (2006) Ambiguous figures and the content of experience. Nous 40(1): 82–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei L., Campbell F. W. (1970) Neurophysiological localization of the vertical and horizontal visual coordinates in man. Science 167: 386–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson S. (1970) Reversibility of perspective in normal and stabilized viewing. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 11: 153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthen M. (2005) Seeing, doing, and knowing: A philosophical theory of sense-perception. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meng M., Tong F. (2004) Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 4: 539–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merikle P. M., Smilek D., Eastwood J. D. (2001) Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition 79: 115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff S., Simons D. J., Franconeri S. L. (2002) The siren song of implicit change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28(4): 798–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer S. E. (1992) Modern theories of gestalt perception. In: Humphreys G. W. (eds) Understanding vision. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke C. (1992) A study of concepts. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M. A. (1994) Object recognition processes can and do operate before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science 3: 105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M. A., Hochberg J. (1983) Opposed set-measurements procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9: 183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M. A., Gibson B. S. (1994) Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations and outlines and subjective contours. Psychological Science 5: 253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z. (1979) The rate of mental rotation of images: A test of a holistic analogue hypothesis. Memory and Cognition 7: 19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z. (2003) Seeing and visualizing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftopoulos A. (2009) Perception and cognition: How do psychology and the neural sciences inform philosophy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftopoulos A., Muller V. (2006) The phenomenal content of experience. Mind and Language 27(2): 187–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock I., Halls S., Davis J. (1994) Why do ambiguous figures reverse?. Acta Psychologica 87: 33–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., Cooper, L. A. (eds) (1982) Mental images and their transformations. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons D. J., Silverman M. (2004) Neural and behavioral measures of change detection. In: Chalupa L. M., Werner J. S. (eds) The visual neurosciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S., Peterson M. A. (2000) Multiplicative effects of intention on the perception of bistable apparent motion. Psychological Science 11: 202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toppino T. (2003) Reversible-figure perception. Perception and Psychophysics 65: 1285–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (2000) Consciousness, color, and content. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (2002) Visual qualia and visual content revisited. In: Chalmers D. (eds) Philosophy of mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (2005) Nonconceptual content, richness and fineness of grain. In: Gendler T., Hawthorne J. (eds) Perceptual experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecera P., Farah J. (1997) Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process?. Perception and Psychophysics 59: 1280–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecera P., O’Reilly R. C. (2000) Graded effects in hierarchical figure-ground organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 26: 1221–1231

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Athanasios Raftopoulos

Authors
  1. Athanasios Raftopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasios Raftopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raftopoulos, A. Ambiguous figures and representationalism. Synthese 181, 489–514 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9743-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9743-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation