Skip to main content
Log in

Akrasia, instincts and revealed preferences

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standard economic theory of choice is extended to accommodate a particular form of akratic choice. The empirical content of the new theory is fully characterized. A characterization of revealed akratic choice, in terms of observable choice only, is also provided. These results are consistent with the viewpoint that akrasia is a concept that can be empirically substantiated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler J. (2002) Akratic believing?. Philosophical Studies 110(1): 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrus, A., & Rozen, K. (2008). Revealed conflicting preferences. Working paper, Harvard University.

  • Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T., & Sandroni, A. (2009). Rationalization. Working paper, Northwestern University.

  • Davidson D. (1969) How is weakness of the will possible? In: Feinberg J. (ed.) Moral concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliaz K., Ok E. (2006) Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games and Economic Behavior 56(1): 61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul F., Pesendorfer W. (2001) Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69(6): 1403–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul F., Pesendorfer W. (2004) Self-control and the theory of consumption. Econometrica 72(1): 119–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houya N., Tadenuma K. (2009) Lexicographic compositions of multiple criteria for decision making. Journal of Economic Theory 144(4): 1770–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubler J., Payne J., Puto C. (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violation of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 9: 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini P., Mariotti M. (2007) Sequentially rationalizable choice. American Economic Review 97(5): 1824–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini P., Mariotti M. (2009) Categorize then choose: Boundedly rational choice and welfare. University of London, Mimeo, Queen Mary

    Google Scholar 

  • Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. (2009). Revealed attention. Working paper, Brown University.

  • Mele A. (1987) Irrationality: An essay on akrasia, self-deception, and self-control. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Peijnenburg J. (2000) Akrasia, dispositions and degrees. Erkenntnis 53(3): 285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty A. (1983) Akratic believers. American Philosophical Quarterly 20(2): 175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Salant Y., Rubinstein A. (2006) A model of choice from lists. Theoretical Economics 1: 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P. (1938) The empirical implications of utility analysis. Econometrica 6(4): 344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1980) Plato, Hare and Davidson on akrasia. Mind 89: 499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvaro Sandroni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandroni, A. Akrasia, instincts and revealed preferences. Synthese 181 (Suppl 1), 1–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9761-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9761-z

Keywords

Navigation