Skip to main content
Log in

Reductionism and the Micro–Macro Mirroring Thesis

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns reductionist views about psychology and the special sciences more generally. I identify a metaphysical assumption in reductionist views which I dub the ‘Micro–Macro Mirroring Thesis’. The Mirroring Thesis says that the relation between the entities of any legitimate higher-level science and their lower-level realizers is similar to that between the entities of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. I argue that reductionism implies the Thesis, and that the Thesis is not a priori. It is more difficult to tell whether the Thesis is true, and I indicate some relevant considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. (1968[1993]). A materialist theory of the mind (revised ed.). London: Routledge.

  • Hiddleston, E. (forthcoming). Second-order properties and three varieties of functionalism. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9518-z.

  • Kim J. (1993) Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. In: Kim J. (eds) Supervenience and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 309–335

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1998a) Mind in a physical world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1998b) Philosophy of mind. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (2008) Reduction and reductive explanation: Is one possible without the other?. In: Howhy J., Kallestrup J. (eds) Being reduced. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 93–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1970[1983]). How to define theoretical terms. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 78–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lewis, D. (1972[1999]). Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Papers in metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 248–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lewis, D. (1980[1983]). Mad pain and martian pain. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 122–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lewis, D. (1983[1999]). New work for a theory of universals. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Papers in metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 8–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lewis, D. (1994[1999]). Reduction of mind. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Papers in metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 291–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schaffer J. (2004) Two conceptions of sparse properties. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85: 92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1984[2003]). Causality and properties. In S. Shoemaker (Ed.), Identity, cause, and mind (expanded edition, pp. 206–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Shoemaker, S. (1998[2003]). Causal and metaphysical necessity. In S. Shoemaker (Ed.), Identity, cause, and mind (expanded edition, pp. 407–426). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Hiddleston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiddleston, E. Reductionism and the Micro–Macro Mirroring Thesis. Synthese 181, 209–226 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9798-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9798-z

Keywords

Navigation