Abstract
Quantifier domain restriction (QDR) and two versions of nominal restriction (NR) are implemented as restrictions that depend on a previously introduced interpreter and interpretation time in a two-dimensional semantic framework on the basis of simple type theory and categorial grammar. Against Stanley (2002) it is argued that a suitable version of QDR can deal with superlatives like tallest. However, it is shown that NR is needed to account for utterances when the speaker intends to convey different restrictions for multiple uses of the same quantifying determiner. We argue that NR generally fares better with such examples but also observe that examples like Every sailor waves at every sailor might be pragmatically anomalous. An account of contextual domain restriction is proposed that (i) excludes these anomalous readings (but it is shown how they could be included), (ii) makes it possible to express different contextual domain restrictions as long-range dependencies on an interpreter and an interpretation time, and (iii) additionally models restrictions based on locative constructions as general mereological constraints introduced by shifting the index.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bach K. (2004) Minding the gap. In: Bianchi C. (Ed.) The semantics/pragmatics distinction. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 27–43
Bach K. (2005) Context ex machina. In: Szabó Z. G. (Ed.) Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 16–44
Bach, K. (2007a). From the strange to the bizarre: Another reply to Cappelen and Lepore. Department of Philosophy, University of San Francisco. Retrieved May 2008, from http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~kbach/.
Bach, K. (2007b). Minimalism for dummies: Reply to Cappelen and Lepore. Department of Philosophy, University of San Francisco. Retrieved May 2008, from http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~kbach/.
Borg E. (2004) Minimal semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cappelen H., Lepore E. (2005) Insensitive semantics. Blackwell, Oxford
Carpenter B. (1997) Type-logical semantic. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Castañeda H.-N. (1967) Indicators and quasi-indicators. American Philosophical Quarterly 4: 85–100
Castañeda H.-N. (1989) Thinking, language, experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN
Dietz R. (2008) Epistemic modals and correct disagreement. In: Carcía-Carpintero M., Kölbel M. (eds) Relative truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 239–262
Etxeberria, U. (2006). Contextual restriction and quantification in basque. In S. Vogeleer (Ed.), Bare plurals, indefinites, and weak-strong distinction (pp. 211–245), Vol. 19 of Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, A. (2004). Domain restriction and the arguments of quantificational determiners. In Proceedings of SALT 14 (pp. 110–128). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Heim I., Kratzer A. (2005) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Hobbs J. R., Stickel D. A., Martin P. (1993) Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63(1–2): 69–142
Iacona A. (2008) Faultless or disagreement (Chapter 13). In: Carcía-Carpintero M. (Ed.) Relative truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 287–295
Jäger G. (2005) Anaphora and type logical grammar. Springer, Dordrecht
Kaplan D. (1989) Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 481–564
Kratzer, A. (2004). Covert quantifier restrictions in natural language. Handout of talk given at the University of British Columbia in 2004, Version of June 2008, SemanticsArchive.net: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mIzMGUyZ/.
Lambek J. (1958) The mathematics of sentence structure. American Mathematical Monthly 65(65): 154–170
Lasersohn P. (2005) Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(6): 643–686
Lasersohn P. (2008) Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics. Philosophical Perspectives 22(1): 305–337
Lewis D. K. (1980) Index, context and content. In: Kanger S., Öhman S. (eds) Philosophy and grammar. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 79–100
MacFarlane, J. (2005). The assessment sensitivity of knowledge attributions. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 197–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacFarlane J. (2007a) Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese 166(2): 231–250
MacFarlane J. (2007b) Relativism and disagreement. Philosophical Studies 132(1): 17–31
MacFarlane J. (2008) Truth in the garden of forking paths. In: Carcía-Carpintero M., Kölbel M. (eds) Relative truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–102
Martí Martínez M. L. (2003). Contextual variables. PhD thesis, University of Connecticut.
Montague R. (1974) The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In: Thomason R. H. (Ed.) Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, London, pp 247–270
Moortgat M. (1997) Categorial type logics. In: Benthem J. v., Meulen A. (eds) Handbook of logic and language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 93–178
Morrill G. (1994) Type logical grammar: Categorial logic of signs. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Moruzzi S. (2008) Assertion, belief and disagreement: A problem for truth-relativism. In: Carcía-Carpintero M., Kölbel M. (eds) Relative truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 207–224
Mount A. (2008) The impurity of “pure” indexicals. Philosophical Studies 138: 193–209
Partee B. H. (2002) Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Portner P., Partee B. H. (eds) Formal semantics: The essential readings. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 357–381
Penco C. (1999) Objective and cognitive context. In: Benerecetti M., Castellani F. (eds) Modeling and using context: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 1688. Springer, New York, pp 270–283
Penco C. (2008) Context and contract. In: Bouquet P., Serafini L., Thomason R. (eds) Perspectives on context. CSLI, Stanford, CA, pp 187–212
Perry J. (1977) Frege on demonstratives. Philosophical Review 86: 474–497
Perry J. (1979) The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 13: 3–21
Perry, J. (1997). Indexicals and demonstratives. In R. Hale & C. Wright, Companion to the philosophy of language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Perry, J. (1998). Indexicals, contexts and unarticulated constituents. In Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI Amsterdam logic, language and computation conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
Perry J. (2001) Reference and reflexivity. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
Perry J. (2003) Predelli’s threatening note: Contexts, utterances, and tokens in the philosophy of language. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 373–387
Perry J. (2005) Using indexicals. In: Devitt M. (Ed.) Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 314–334
Predelli S. (2006) The problem with token-reflexivity. Synthese 148(1): 5–29
Rast E. H. (2007) Reference and indexicality. Logos Verlag, Berlin
Rast E.H. (2009) Context and interpretation. In: Larrazabal J.M., Zubeldia L. (eds) Meaning, content, and argument, Proceedings of the ILCLI international workshop on semantics, pragmatics, and rhetoric. University of the Basque Country Press, San Sebastian, pp 515–534
Recanati, F. (2004a). Deixis and anaphora. In Z. G. Szabó, Semantics vs. pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recanati F. (2004b) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Recanati F. (2010) Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press (=Syntax and semantics vol 9)
Stanley J. (2000) Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(4): 391–434
Stanley J. (2002) Nominal restriction (Chapter 12). In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Logical form and language. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 365–388
Stanley J., Szabó Z. G. (2000) On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15(2–3): 219–261
Steedman M. (1996) Surface structure and interpretation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Steedman M. (2000) The syntactic process. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Stojanovic I. (2007) Talking about taste: Disagreement, implicit arguments, and relative truth. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(6): 691–706
Stokke A. (2010) Intention-sensitive semantics. Synthese 175(3): 383–404
van Benthem J. (1995) Language in action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
von Fintel, K. (1994). Restrictions on quantifier domains. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts.
von Stechow A., Zimmermann T. E. (2005) A problem for a compositional treatment of de re attitudes. In: Carlson G. N., Pelletier F. J. (eds) Reference and quantification: The Partee effect. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 207–228
Westerståhl D. (1984) Determiners and context sets. In: Benthem J., Meuren A. (eds) Quantifiers in natural language. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 45–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rast, E.H. On contextual domain restriction in categorial grammar. Synthese 190, 2085–2115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9960-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9960-2