Abstract
In this paper, we try to shed light on the ontological puzzle pertaining to models and to contribute to a better understanding of what models are. Our suggestion is that models should be regarded as a specific kind of signs according to the sign theory put forward by Charles S. Peirce, and, more precisely, as icons, i.e. as signs which are characterized by a similarity relation between sign (model) and object (original). We argue for this (1) by analyzing from a semiotic point of view the representational relation which is characteristic of models. We then corroborate our hypothesis (2) by discussing the conceptual differences between icons, i.e. models, and indexical and symbolic signs and (3) by putting forward a general classification of all icons into three functional subclasses (images, diagrams, and metaphors). Subsequently, we (4) integratively refine our results by resorting to two influential and, as can be shown, complementary philosophy of science approaches to models. This yields the following result: models are determined by a semiotic structure in which a subject intentionally uses an object, i.e. the model, as a sign for another object, i.e. the original, in the context of a chosen theory or language in order to attain a specific end by instituting a representational relation in which the syntactic structure of the model, i.e. its attributes and relations, represents by way of a mapping the properties of the original, which hence are regarded as similar in a relevant manner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkin, A. (2010). Peirce’s theory of signs. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/.
Bailer-Jones D. (2009) Scientific models in philosophy of science. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA
Balzer W. (1997) Die Wissenschaft und ihre Methoden: Grundsätze der Wissenschaftstheorie. Verlag Karl Alber, München
Black M. (1962) Models and metaphors. Studies in language and philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Carnap R. (1926) Physikalische Begriffsbildung. Braun, Karlsruhe
Chang, C. C. (1979). Model theory 1945–1971. In L. Henkin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium held at the University of California (2nd ed., pp. 173–186), Berkeley, 23–30 June 1971. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Contessa G. (2010) Scientific models and fictional objects. Synthese 172: 215–229
CP = Hartshorne, Ch. et al. (Eds.). (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Eco U. (2002) Einführung in die Semiotik. Fink, München
Frigg, R. (2002). Models and representation: Why structures are not enough. Measurement in Physics and Economics Project Discussion Paper Series, DP MEAS 25/02, London School of Economics. Retrieved from http://www.romanfrigg.org/writings/Models_and_Representation.pdf.
Frigg R. (2006) Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria 55: 49–65
Frigg R. (2010) Models and fiction. Synthese 172: 251–268
Frigg R., Hartmann S. (2006) Models in science. In: Sarkar S., Pfeifer J. (Eds.) The philosophy of science: An Encyclopedia. Routledge, New York, pp 740–749
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2009). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/.
Giere R. N. (1988) Explaining science: A cognitive approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Giere R. N. (1999) Using models to represent reality. In: Magnani L., Nersessian N. J., Thagard P. (Eds.) Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Kluwer, New York, pp 41–57
Giere R. N. (2004) How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71: 742–752
Giere R. N. (2010) An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese 172: 269–281
Hartmann, S. (2010). Modelle. In H.-J. Sandkühler (Ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie (Vol. 2, pp. 1627–1632). Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.
Jakobson, R. (1988). Semiotik. Ausgewählte Texte. 1919–1982. Herausgegeben von Elmar Holenstein. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kant, I. (1781/1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: J. F. Hartknoch.
Kralemann B. (2002) Zur Analyse des Modellbegriffs. In: Deppert W., Köther K., Kralemann B., Lattmann C., Martens N., Schaefer J. (Eds.) Selbstorganisierte Systemzeiten. Ein interdisziplinärer Diskurs zur Modellierung lebender Systeme auf der Grundlage interner Rhythmen. Leipzig, Leipziger Universitätsverlag, pp 145–164
Kralemann B. (2006) Umwelt, Kultur, Semantik - Realität. Leipzig, Leipziger Universitätsverlag
Kuhn T. S. (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lattmann, C. (2012). Icons of novel thought. A new perspective on Peirce’s definition of metaphor (CP 2.277). Semiotica, 192 (in print).
Mahr B. (2009) Information science and the logic of models. Software and System Modeling 8: 365–383
Mahr B. (2010) Intentionality and modeling of conception. In: Bab S., Robering K. (Eds.) Judgements and propositions—Logical, linguistic, and cognitive issues. Logos Verlag, Berlin, pp 61–87
Mittelstraß, J., Gabriel, G., & Carrier, M. (2005). Art. “ähnlich/Ähnlichkeit”. In J. Mittelstraß (Ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie (Vol. 1, p. 52). Stuttgart: Metzler.
MS = manuscript by Charles S. Peirce, numbered according to Robins, R. S. (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce (Worcester: Univ. of Massachusetts Press); Robins, R. S. (1971). The Peirce Papers. A Supplementary Catalogue. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7, 37–57.
Queiroz J., Stjernfelt F. (2011) Introduction: Diagrammatical reasoning and Peircean logic representations. Semiotica 186: 1–4
Quine W. V. O. (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review 60: 20–43
Rolf E. (2005) Metaphertheorien. Typologie, Darstellung, Bibliographie. de Gruyter, Berlin
Saussure, F. de (1983). Course in general linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds., Trans. R. Harris). La Salle: Open Court.
Short T. L. (2007) Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stachowiak H. (1973) Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer, Wien
Stjernfelt F. (2007) Diagrammatology An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht
Stjernfelt F. (2011) On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce’s diagrammatology. Semiotica 186: 395–419
Suárez M. (2003) Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 225–243
Suárez M. (2004) An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science 71: 767–779
Suppes P. (1960) A comparison of the meaning and the uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences. Synthese 12: 287–301
Vaught, R. L. (1979). Model theory before 1945. In L. Henkin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tarski symposium held at the University of California (2nd ed., pp. 173–186), Berkeley 23–30 June 1971. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Wittgenstein L. (1953) Philosophische Untersuchungen. Blackwell, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kralemann, B., Lattmann, C. Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese 190, 3397–3420 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0176-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0176-x