Skip to main content
Log in

A scalable network-based mobility management framework in heterogeneous IP-based networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a mobility management scheme to provide a mobile node with high-quality handovers among heterogeneous wireless access networks. The proposed scheme employs a signaling architecture to support fast and reliable delivery of control messages by separating a control plane from a data transport plane in the core network. The proposed scheme is based on the network-based mobility management framework which requires the minimum modifications on terminal devices. With interaction between Layers 2 and 3, the proposed scheme accelerates the handover control procedures. It also enables a mobile subscriber to select a target network for a vertical handover with consideration of not only wireless signal strength but also user preference and quality-of-service status. The proposed scheme addresses the well-known problems of the Mobile IP-based approaches, triangular routing and bottleneck at the home agent, since it establishes a data tunnel for a mobile node along the shortest path between two different access networks. The simulation and experimental results indicate that our scheme provisions more efficient performance than the existing approaches in terms of handover latency, data packet loss, data delivery latency and load balancing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perkins, C. (2002). IP mobility support for IPv4. In RFC3344 on IETF, Aug. 2002.

  2. Johnson, D., Perkins, C., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6. In RFC3775 on IETF, June 2004.

  3. Gundavelli, S. et al. (2008). Proxy mobile IPv6. In RFC5213 on IETF, Aug. 2008.

  4. Kong, K. et al. (2008). Mobility management for All-lP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(2), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakikawa, R., & Gundavelli, S. (2009). IPv4 support for proxy mobile IPv6. In Internet Draft on IETF, April 2009.

  6. Gupta, V. et al. (2009). Local and metropolitan area networks: media independent handover services. In IEEE Standard 802.21-2008, Jan. 2009.

  7. Taniuchi, K. et al. (2009). IEEE 802.21: media independent handover: features, applicability, and realization. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(1), 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliva et al. (2008). An overview of IEEE 802.21: media-independent handover services. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(4), 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogelstroem, E., Jonsson, A., & Perkins, C. (2007). Mobile IPv4 regional registration. In RFC4857 on IETF, June 2007.

  10. Hong, C. et al. (2002). An efficient fault tolerance protocol with backup foreign agents in a hierarchical local registration mobile IP. ETRI Journal, 24(1), 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soliman, H. et al. (2005). Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6). In RFC4140 on IETF, Aug. 2005.

  12. Han, Y., & Min, S. (2009). Performance analysis of hierarchical mobile IPv6: does it improve mobile Ipv6 in terms of handover speed? Wireless Personal Communications (WPC), 48(4), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El Malki, K. (2007). Low-latency handoffs in mobile IPv4. In RFC4881 on IETF, June 2007.

  14. Koodli, R. (2005). Fast handovers for mobile IPv6. In RFC4068 on IETF, July 2005.

  15. Ivov, E., Montavont, J., & Noel, T. (2008). Thorough empirical analysis of the IETF FMIPv6 protocol over IEEE 802.11 networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(2), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Y. et al. (2007). Service-oriented FMIPv6 framework for efficient handovers in 4G networks. In Proc. of IEEE Globecom07 (pp. 4478–4482).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A., & Callon, R. (2001). Multiprotocol label switching architecture. In RFC3031 on IETF, Jan. 2001.

  18. Kim, J. et al. (2008). Heterogeneous networks and terminal-aware QoS/QoE-guaranteed mobile IPTV service. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46(5), 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Um, T., Choi, S., & Choi, J. (2009). MPLS-based mobility and QoS capabilities for NGN services. In ITU-T Rec. Y.2807, Jan. 2009.

  20. ITU-T SG13/19 (2008). Framework of location management for NGN. In ITU-T Rec. Q.1708/Y.2805, Sept. 2008.

  21. ITU-T SG13/19 (2008). Framework of handover control for NGN. In ITU-T Rec. Q.1709/Y.2806, Sept. 2008.

  22. Droms, R. (1997). Dynamic host configuration protocol. In RFC2131 on IETF, Mar. 1997.

  23. NS-2 Network Simulator, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youn-Hee Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, KH., Lee, HW., Ryu, W. et al. A scalable network-based mobility management framework in heterogeneous IP-based networks. Telecommun Syst 52, 1989–2002 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9479-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9479-3

Keywords

Navigation