Abstract
Seamless service delivery for mobile users complemented with Quality of Service provisioning for their real-time applications have a hot topic in the field of mobile communication in recent years. Seamless mobility goes hand in hand with Mobile IPv6 protocol. Since many different handover schemes trying to solve the Quality of Service issues have been developed a need for means for comparison has arisen. This paper presents an enhanced universal analytical method for comparison of handover schemes. The method focuses on two important aspects influencing the handover performance—binding update cost and packet delivery cost. The use of the proposed method is presented for comparison of four most common handover schemes—MIPv6, HMIPv6, FMIPv6 and F-HMIPv6.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
An, Y. Y. et al. (2006). Reduction of handover latency using MIH services in MIPv6. In AINA 2006 (Vol. 02), March [cit. 2010-04-23].
Guan, J. et al. (2009). Implementation and analysis of proxy MIPv6. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 9999(9999) [cit. 2009-11-24].
Gwon, Y., Kempf, J., & Yegin, A. (2008). Scalability and robustness analysis of IPv6 mobility protocols [cit. 2010-04-23].
Johnson, D. B., Perkins, C. E., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6. The Internet Engineering Force Task RFC 3775, June.
Jung, H., Soliman, H., Koh, S., & Takamiya, N. (2006). Fast handover for hierarchical MIPv6. Internet Draft, draft-jung-mipshop-fhmipv6-00.txt, April.
Koodli, G. (2005). Fast handovers for mobile IPv6. The Internet Engineering Force Task RFC 4068, July.
Koodli, R., & Perkins, Ch. E. (2001). Fast handovers and context transfers in mobile networks. ACM Computer Communication Review [online], 31(5) [cit. 2010-04-23].
Lee, K., & Mun, Y. (2005). An efficient macro mobility scheme supporting fast handover in hierarchical mobile IPv6. Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 3480. Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2005 (pp. 408–417). Berlin: Springer.
Makaya, Ch., & Pierre, S. (2008). An analytical framework for performance evaluation of IPv6-based mobility management protocols. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(3), 972–983 [cit. 2009-11-24].
Pack, S., & Choi, Y. (2003). Performance analysis of fast handover in mobile IPv6 networks. In Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 2775. Personal wireless communications (pp. 679–691). Berlin: Springer.
Pack, S., & Choi, Y. (2004). A study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E87-B(3), 462–469.
Pack, S., Kwon, T., & Choi, Y. (2007) Adaptive local route optimization in hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(8) [cit. 2010-04-23].
Soliman, H., Castellucia, C., El-Malki, K., & Bellier, L. (2005). Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management. The Internet Engineering Force Task RFC 4140, August.
Zhang, L. J., & Pierre, S. (2008). Evaluating the performance of fast handover for hierarchical MIPv6 in cellular networks. Journal of Networks, 3(6), 36–43 [cit. 2009-11-24].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skorepa, M., Klugl, R. Enhanced analytical method for IP mobility handover schemes cost evaluation. Telecommun Syst 52, 1573–1582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9524-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9524-2