Skip to main content
Log in

On the optimization of the contention resolution mechanism for IEEE 802.16 networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The IEEE 802.16 standard defines a contention bandwidth request mechanism offering QoS-aware broadband access through a wireless medium. According to the standard, the Base Station (BS) is responsible for granting the requests issued by the Subscriber Stations (SSs). The SSs communicate their requests to the BS by placing their requests into the uplink subframe, using the contention period defined within the subframe for this purpose. The size of contention period, defined in minislots, is fixed by the BS on a frame by frame basis. The remaining part of the uplink subframe is used to carry the data frames. A tradeoff between these two periods of the uplink subframe is required for an effective operation of the system. On the contrary, if the size of the contention is shorten below a certain threshold, the SSs may be unable to place their requests within the time required by the end-user applications.

In this paper, we introduce an adaptive mechanism of the contention period size. The proposed mechanism takes into account the varying operation conditions of the system by estimating the number of stations that may be placing a request. Simulation results confirm that our proposal outperforms other mechanisms having recently been reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. IEEE (2004). IEEE 802.16 standard—local and metropolitan area networks. Part 16. Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems (IEEE Std 802.16-2004), IEEE Std., 1 October 2004, revision of IEEE Std 802.16-2001.

  2. IEEE (2002). IEEE 802.16 standard—local and metropolitan area networks. Part 16. Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems (IEEE Std 802.16-2001), IEEE Std., 8 April 2002.

  3. IEEE (2002). IEEE 802.16 Standard—local and metropolitan area networks. Part 16. Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems. Amendment 1. Detailed system profiles for 10–66 GHz (IEEE Std 802.16c-2002), IEEE Std., 15 January 2003, amendment to IEEE Std 802.16-2001.

  4. IEEE (2003). IEEE 802.16 Standard—local and metropolitan area networks. Part 16. Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems. Amendment 2. Medium access control modifications and additional physical layer specifications for 2–11 GHz (IEEE Std 802.16a-2003), IEEE Std., 1 April 2003, amendment to IEEE Std 802.16-2001.

  5. IEEE (2006). IEEE 802.16 Standard—local and metropolitan area networks. Part 16. Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems—Amendment 2: physical and medium access control layers for combined fixed and mobile operation in licensed bands and corrigendum 1 (IEEE Std 802.16e-2005), IEEE Std., 28 February 2006, amendment and Corrigendum to IEEE Std 802.16-2004.

  6. IEEE (2009). IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks. Part 16. Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems (IEEE Std 802.16-2009), IEEE Std., 13 May 2009, revision of IEEE Std 802.16-2004.

  7. Eklund, C., Marks, R. B., Stanwood, K. L., & Wang, S. (2002). IEEE standard 802.16: a technical overview of the WirelessMANTM air interface for broadband wireless access. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(6), 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sayenko, A., Alanen, O., & Hämäläinen, T. (2007). On contention resolution parameters for the IEEE 802.16 base station. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM’2007) (pp. 4957–4962), Washington, DC, USA, 26–30 November 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sayenko, A., Alanen, O., & Hämäläinen, T. (2007). Adaptive contention resolution parameters for the IEEE 802.16 networks. In Proceedings of the 4th international ICST conference on heterogeneous networking for quality, reliability, security and robustness (QShine’2007) Vancouver, Canada, 14–17 August 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hawa, M., & Petr, D. W. (2002). Quality of service scheduling in cable and broadband wireless access systems. In 10th IEEE international workshop on quality of service (pp. 247–255), May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobliakov, V. A., Turlikov, A. M., & Vinel, A. V. (2006). Distributed queue random multiple access algorithm for centralized data networks. In Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on consumer electronics (ISCE’2006) (pp. 1–6), St. Petersburg, Russia, 28 June–1 July 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Delicado, J., Delicado, F. M., & Orozco-Barbosa, L. (2008). Request mechanisms to reduce the contention period in 802.16: a comparison. In Proceedings of the 10th IFIP international conference on mobile and wireless communications networks (MWCN’2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oh, S.-M., & Kim, J.-H. (2005). The analysis of the optimal contention period for broadband wireless access network. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom 2005 Workshops) (pp. 215–219), Kauai Island, Hawaii, 8–12 March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, D.-H., Song, J.-H., Kim, M.-S., & Han, K.-J. (2005). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.16 wireless metropolitan area network. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on distributed frameworks for multimedia applications (DFMA’2005) (pp. 130–137). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yan, J., & Kuo, G.-S. (2006). Cross-layer design of optimal contention period for IEEE 802.16 BWA systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2006) (Vol. 4, pp. 1807–1812), Istanbul, Turkey, 11–15 June 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinel, A., Zhang, Y., Lott, M., & Tiurlikov, A. (2005). Performance analysis of the random access in IEEE 802.16. In Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC’2005) (Vol. 3 pp. 1596–1600), Berlin, Germany, 11–14 September 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinel, A., Zhang, Y., Ni, Q., & Lyakhov, A. (2006). Efficient request mechanism usage in IEEE 802.16. In Proceedings of the 49th IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2006), San Francisco, California, USA, 27 November–1 December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doha, A., Hassanein, H., & Takahara, G. (2006). Performance evaluation of reservation medium access control in IEEE 802.16 networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACS/IEEE international conference on computer systems and applications (AICCSA 2006) (pp. 369–374).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. I. OPNET Technologies (2005). “OPNET Modeler 11.5”.

  20. Klemm, A., Lindemann, C., & Lohmann, M. (2001). Traffic modeling and characterization for UMTS networks. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM’2001) (Vol. 3, pp. 1741–1746), San Antonio, TX, USA, 25–29 November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Delicado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delicado, J., Delicado, F.M. & Orozco-Barbosa, L. On the optimization of the contention resolution mechanism for IEEE 802.16 networks. Telecommun Syst 52, 2599–2609 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9600-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9600-7

Keywords