Abstract
We present architecture of a large dynamic optical packet/burst switch comprising a number of smaller switching fabrics that are interconnected by internal fiber links. The switching fabrics are based on the broadcast-and-select architecture, while the internal interconnection network is a full mesh. An extensive performance study has been performed and results regarding scalability, packet/burst loss rate and achievable throughput for four scheduling algorithms are shown.










Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aleksic, S. (2006). Design considerations for a high-speed metro network using all-optical packet processing. In International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON 2006) (Vol. 3, pp. 82–86).
Aleksic, S. (2007). A novel packet/burst switch architecture comprising internal fiber rings. In International conference on telecommunications (ConTEL 2007), Zagreb, Croatia (Vol. 1, pp. 31–35).
Aleksic, S. (2009). Analysis of power consumption in future high-capacity network nodes. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 1(3), 245–258.
Aleksic, S. (2011). Optically transparent integrated metro-access network. Telecommunications Systems, 52, 1505–1515. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9515-3.
Aleksic, S. (2013). Energy-efficient communication networks for improved global energy productivity. Telecommunication Systems. doi:10.1007/s11235-013-9726-x.
Aleksic, S., Krajinovic, V., & Bengi, K. (2001). An overview on technologies for access nodes in ultra-fast otdm photonic networks. Photonic Network Communications, 3(1/2), 75–90.
Aziz, K., Sarwar, S., & Aleksic, S. (2008). Dimensioning an optical packet/burst switch—more interconnections or more delay lines? In International conference on optical network design and modeling (ONDM 2008) (pp. 1–6).
Fiorani, M., Casoni, M., & Aleksic, S. (2011). Performance and power consumption analysis of a hybrid optical core node. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 3(6), 502–513. doi:10.1364/JOCN.3.000502.
Guillemot, C., Renaud, M., Gambini, P., Janz, C., Andonovic, I., Bauknecht, R., Bostica, B., Burzio, M., Callegati, F., Casoni, M., Chiaroni, D., Clerot, F., Danielsen, S., Dorgeuille, F., Dupas, A., Franzen, A., Hansen, P., Hunter, D., Kloch, A., Krahenbuhl, R., Lavigne, B., Le Corre, A., Raffaelli, C., Schilling, M., Simon, J. C., & Zucchelli, L. (1998). Transparent optical packet switching: the European acts keops project approach. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 16(12), 2117–2134.
Hansen, P. B., Joergensen, C., Danielsen, S. L., Mikkelsen, B., & Stubkjaer, K. E. (1997). Cascadability of broadcast and select switch blocks with interferometric wavelength converters at 10 gbit/s. In Conference on optical fiber communication (OFC 1997), Dallas, TX, USA (pp. 148–149).
Inghelbrecht, V., Steyaert, B., Wittevrongel, S., & Bruneel, H. (2006). Burst loss and delay in optical buffers with offset-time management. Telecommunications Systems, 31, 247–258. doi:10.1007/s11235-006-6523-9.
Lowery, A. J. (1987). New dynamic semiconductor laser model based on the transmission-line modelling method. IEEE Photonics Journal, 134(5), 281–289.
Maach, A., Bochman, G. V., & Mouftah, H. (2004). Congestion control and contention elimination in optical burst switching. Telecommunications Systems, 27, 115–131. doi:10.1023/B:TELS.0000041005.87009.e5.
Nandi, M., Turuk, A. K., Puthal, D. K., & Dutta, S. (2009). Best fit void filling algorithm in optical burst switching networks. In Second international conference on emerging trends in engineering & technology (pp. 609–614).
Papadimitriou, G. I., Papazoglou, C., & Pomportsis, A. S. (2003). Optical switching: switch fabrics, techniques, and architectures. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 21(2), 384–405.
Raffaelli, C., Aleksic, S., Callegati, F., Cerroni, W., Pattavina, A., & Savi, M. (2009). Optical packet switching. In J. Aracil & F. Callegati (Eds.), Enabling optical Internet with advanced network technologies (Vol. 5, pp. 31–85).
Ricciardi, S., Careglio, D., Santos-Boada, G., Solé-Pareta, J., Fiore, U., & Palmieri, F. (2011). Towards an energy-aware Internet: modeling a cross-layer optimization approach. Telecommunications Systems, 52(2), 1247–1268. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9645-7.
Vlachos, K., Raffaelli, C., Aleksic, S., Andriolli, N., Apostolopoulos, D., Avramopoulos, H., Erasme, D., Klonidis, D., Scaffardi, M., Schulze, K., Spiropoulou, M., Sygletos, S., Tomkos, I., Vazquez, C., Zouraraki, O., & Neri, F. (2009). Photonics in switching: enabling technologies and subsystem design. The Journal of Optical Networking, 8(5), 404–428.
Vokkarane, V. A., Jue, J. P., & Sitaraman, S. (2002). Burst segmentation: an approach for reducing packet loss in optical burst switched networks. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 2673–2677).
Xu, L., & Perros, H.G., & Rouskas, G.N. (2001). A survey of optical packet switching and optical burst switching. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(1), 136–142.
Xiong, Y., Vandenhoute, M., & Cankaya, H. C. (2000). Control architecture in optical burst-switched wdm networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18, 1838–1851.
Yoo, S. J. B. (2006). Optical packet and burst switching technologies for the future photonic Internet. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 24(12), 4468–4492.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Model of the gain-clamped SOA
Appendix: Model of the gain-clamped SOA
Semiconductor optical amplifiers can be modelled using either single-section or multiple-section models. The gain and the phase-shift depend on the carrier density. For our purpose, we used a two-directional distributed time-domain model of SOA based of a modification of the transmission line laser modelling method [12]. The model divides device into n longitudinal sections. In each section of length ΔL, the carrier dynamics are described by the following rate equations for carrier density:
where J is the injection current density, e is the electron charge, d is the thickness of the active layer, v g is the group velocity, N e is the carrier density, S is the photon density, and A, B, and C are the monomolecular, bimolecular, and Auger recombination coefficients, respectively. Photon densities are obtained from field strengths in both longitudinal directions:
where E R and E L are fields travelling in the right and left direction, respectively. Thus, the model represents interactions of the local optical fields and the carrier density within a section, while the carrier density is assumed to be homogeneous within a section rather than along the whole device. This allows a consideration of inhomogenities along the length of the active region as well as an inclusion of spectral hole burning (SHB) effect in the model. The material gain of a section is governed by the carrier density within this section. It is calculated using the following expression:
where N et is the carrier density at the transparency point (the point where g=0), and a is the gain cross section also known as the differential gain coefficient. Because the carrier density is assumed to be constant across a section, the unsaturated gain factor is also constant. The material gain nonlinearity induced phenomenologically by the gain compression parameter, ε and caused by the finite intraband relaxation times of the carriers implies a reduction of gain by 1/(1+εS). Thus, the gain saturates for high photon densities. The intraband processes include effects such as SHB and carrier heating, which do not affect the total carrier density, but lead to a change in the carrier distribution within the conduction and valence band. To describe the non-instantaneous nature of the gain nonlinearity, a time constant, t nl , is used to filter the instantaneous photon density in the calculation of the nonlinear gain. The amplification of the field within a section is then given by:
where G represents the field gain coefficient across the section, i.e., G=exp[(g nl −a s )/ΔL], a s is the waveguide attenuation factor, and α is the linewidth enhancement factor. \(E^{o}_{R,L}\) and \(E^{i}_{R,L}\) are fields at the right and left inputs and the outputs of a model section, respectively. The phase shift between fields at the input and output of the amplifier in dependence of the carrier concentration induced refractive index change can be then calculated according to: Δφ=−Γαg nl ΔL/2. A gain-clamped SOA is realized by placing two distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) at both sides of the active region, thereby achieving lasing in the SOA cavity at a wavelength different from the signal wavelength. These passive DBR sections were modelled using the same model as for the active region, but without the gain model. The index-coupling is represented by alternate low and high impedance subsections. In this manner, the modulation of the refractive index along the waveguide structure can be effectively modelled.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aleksic, S., Aziz, K. Scalable optical switch with internal fiber network. Telecommun Syst 55, 471–479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9802-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9802-2