Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed probabilistic medium access with multipacket reception and Markovian traffic

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enabling multipacket reception (MPR) at the physical layer is a promising way to achieve higher bandwidth efficiency while reducing the complexity of the medium access control layer in distributed wireless networks. We study distributed probabilistic access where transmitting nodes access the shared wireless medium with a probability based on the node’s information about the aggregate traffic carried by the network. We model bursty traffic by rate-controlled two-state Markov sources and introduce a parameter that describes the “burstiness” level of the offered traffic. A throughput-optimal medium access strategy utilizing limited feedback is then described and its performance is examined for traffic with different levels of burstiness. It is shown that the bursty nature of the traffic in data networks allows for improvement of the bandwidth efficiency. Bounds on the system throughput are proposed and the queuing delay is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper, throughput is measured in packets per slot duration.

  2. The normalized throughput can be thought of as a measure of bandwidth efficiency if the maximum load that the multiuser detection handles is fixed, i.e., if the required bandwidth per packet increases proportionally to K.

  3. Generalization of the algorithm to cases of less frequent feedback is straight-forward.

  4. Poisson traffic with average rate λ is equivalent to the case of M→∞ and α=1−δ=λ/M.

  5. The reason why these values do not act as exact bounds is the slight difference between short-term-optimal and long-term-optimal selections of p explained earlier.

References

  1. Abramson, N. (1970). The aloha system—another alternative for computer communications. In Proc. fall joint comput. conf, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abramson, N. (1977). The throughput of packet broadcasting channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-25(1), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adas, A. (1997). Traffic models in broadband networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(7), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baum, L. E., Petrie, T., Soules, G., & Weiss, N. (1970). A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41(1), 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghanbarinejad, M., & Schlegel, C. (2010). Controlled random access with multipacket reception and traffic uncertainty. In Proc. IEEE Globecom’10 workshops, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghanbarinejad, M., & Schlegel, C. (2011). Analysis of controlled probabilistic access with multipacket reception. In Proc. IEEE Globecom’11, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghanbarinejad, M., & Schlegel, C. (2011). Throughput-optimal distributed probabilistic medium-access in mpr-capable networks. In C. Sacchi et al. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 6886. Multiple access comm (pp. 75–86). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghanbarinejad, M., Schlegel, C., & Gburzynski, P. (2009). Adaptive probabilistic medium access in mpr-capable ad-hoc wireless networks. In Proc. IEEE Globecom’09, Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinrock, L., & Tobagi, F. A. (1975). Packet switching in radio channels: part I—carrier sense multiple-access modes and their throughput-delay characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-23(12), 1400–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, A., & Patil, D. (1997). Stability and throughput analysis of unslotted cdma-aloha with finite number of users and code sharing. Telecommunications Systems, 8(2–4), 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lagkas, T. D., Stratogiannis, D. G., & Chatzimisios, P. (2011). Modeling and performance analysis of an alternative to IEEE 802.11e hybrid control function. Telecommunications Systems doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9477-5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Molle, M. L., & Christensen, K. J. (1998). The effects of controlling capture on multimedia traffic for shared ethernet systems. Telecommunications Systems, 9(3–4), 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Monahan, G. E. (1982). A survey of partially observable Markov decision processes: theory, models, and algorithms. Management Science, 28(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagaraj, S., Truhachev, D., & Schlegel, C. (2008). Analysis of a random channel access scheme with multi-packet reception. In Proc. IEEE Globecom’08, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Puterman, M. L. (1994). Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Tobagi, F. A. (1980). Analysis of a two-hop centralized packet radio network—part I: slotted aloha. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-28(2), 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ware, C., Judge, J., Chicharo, J., & Dutkiewicz, E. (2000). Unfairness and capture behaviour in 802.11 adhoc networks. In Proc. IEEE intl. conf. comm. (ICC), New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Ghanbarinejad.

Appendix

Appendix

Proof of Proposition 1

First, we show that the following sequence

$$ \xi_N:=Np_K^*(N),\quad N\in\mathbb{N} $$

converges to

$$ \lambda_K^* \triangleq \operatorname*{\arg\max}_\lambda R_K^\mathrm{AL}( \lambda). $$

Define

$$ l_K \triangleq\lim_{n\to\infty} \sup _{N>n} \bigl( \xi_N-\lambda_K^* \bigr). $$

It follows that any subsequence of ξ N arbitrarily close to \(\lambda _{K}^{*}+l_{K}\) is an infinite sequence, i.e., the subsequence indexed by

$$ I_K^{(\varepsilon)} \triangleq \bigl\{N:\big|\xi_N- \bigl(\lambda _K^*+l_K\bigr)\big|<\varepsilon \bigr\} $$

is infinite for any ε>0. Therefore, the subsequence converges to \(\lambda_{K}^{*}+l_{K}\) as ε→0+. It follows that the distribution of N Bernoulli trials with probability \(p_{K}^{*}(N)\) can arbitrarily approach a Poisson distribution with mean \(\lambda _{K}^{*}+l_{K}\) with sufficiently small ε>0. This distribution is asymptotically suboptimal unless l K =0 (following the definition of \(\lambda_{K}^{*}\)). Since the optimality of \(p_{K}^{*}\) must result in the asymptotic optimality of ξ N and all its subsequences, we have l K =0.

As a result, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &{\lim_{\lambda\to\infty} \Pr \bigl \{N^\mathrm {tx}=n\bigr \}} \\ &{\quad= \lim_{\lambda\to\infty} \sum_{N=n}^\infty \biggl(\exp(-\lambda )\frac{\lambda^N}{N!} \biggr) f_{\mathrm {bin}}\bigl (n;N,p_K^*(N)\bigr )} \\ &{\quad= \lim_{\lambda\to\infty} \sum_{N=n}^\infty \biggl(\exp(-\lambda )\frac{\lambda^N}{N!} \biggr) \biggl(\exp\bigl(- \lambda_K^*\bigr)\frac{{\lambda _K^*}^n}{n!} \biggr)} \\ &{\quad= \biggl(\exp\bigl(-\lambda_K^*\bigr)\frac{{\lambda_K^*}^n}{n!} \biggr) \lim_{\lambda\to\infty} \sum_{N=n}^\infty \biggl(\exp(-\lambda)\frac{\lambda ^N}{N!} \biggr)} \\ &{\quad= \biggl(\exp\bigl(-\lambda_K^*\bigr)\frac{{\lambda_K^*}^n}{n!} \biggr),} \end{aligned}$$

where the second and the last equality hold because the CDF of the Poisson distribution at any finite value tends to zero as its mean goes to infinity. This means that the asymptotic distribution of the number of transmitted packets with GAPA follows a Poisson distribution with mean \(\lambda_{K}^{*}\) as λ→∞. Therefore, the system performs as if the aggregate offered traffic was Poisson with mean \(\lambda_{K}^{*}\) and Aloha was used. □

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghanbarinejad, M., Schlegel, C. Distributed probabilistic medium access with multipacket reception and Markovian traffic. Telecommun Syst 56, 311–321 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9838-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9838-3

Keywords

Navigation