Skip to main content
Log in

Network resource efficient routing in mobile ad hoc wireless networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Network resources in mobile ad hoc wireless networks (MANETs) are constrained due to their dynamic topology and lack of centralized control. Mobile nodes in MANETs tend to broadcast packets to exchange information and consume lots of network resources such as network bandwidth and battery power of each node during forwarding their packets. Hence, the conserving network resource is crucial to maintain the quality of network services without interruptions. In order to discover an ideal routing algorithm that should use minimum network resources and improve network performance, we propose an adaptive-gossiping routing algorithm that saves network bandwidth and energy consumption at each node by reducing the duplicated routing messages. Our new analytical model of adaptive-gossiping probability \(p_{n}\) provides a less routing overhead which results in conserving network resources and reducing the end-to-end delay. The both analytical and experimental results of our proposed method confirm its advantages over flooding and static-gossiping based routing protocols in large-scale networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bettstetter, C., & Eberspacher, J. (2003). Hop distances in homogeneous ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of (ICON’03) (pp. 603–609).

  2. Chandra, R., Ramasubramanian, V., & Birman, K. P. (2001). Anonymous gossip: Improving multicast reliability in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ( ICDCS’01) (pp. 275–283).

  3. Chen, S., & Nahrstedt, K. (1999). Distributed quality-of-service routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(8), 1488–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L., & Heinzelman, W. B. (2007). A survey of routing protocols that support QoS in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Network, 21(6), 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corson, S., & Macker, J. (1999). Mobile ad hoc networking (MANET): Routing protocol performance issues and evaluating considerations. RFC Editor.

  6. Corson, S., & Macker, J. (1999). Mobile ad hoc networking (MANET): Routing protocol performance issues and evaluating considerations. RFC Editor.

  7. Eugster, P. T., Guerraoui, R., Handurukande, S. B., Kouznetsov, P., & Kermarrec, A.-M. (2003). Lightweight probabilistic broadcast. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 21(4), 341–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guan, X., Guan, L., Wang, X. G., & Ohtsuki, T. (2010). A new load balancing and data collection algorithm for energy saving in wireless sensor networks. Telecommunication Systems, 45, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hass, Z., Halpern, J. Y., & Li, L. (2006). Gossip-based ad hoc routing. IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, 14(3), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinzelman, W., Kulik, J., & Balakrishnan, H. (1999). Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sesor networks. In Proceedings of (MobiCom’99) (pp. 174–185).

  11. IEEE standard for Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications, IEEE Std: 802.11b-1999/Cor 1–2001 (2001).

  12. Kermarrec, A.-M., & Steen, M. V. (2007). Gossiping in distributed systems. ACM Operating System Review, 41(5), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, A., & Ra, I. (2010). Adaptive-gossiping for an energy-aware routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of (IWCMC’10) (pp. 1131–1135).

  14. Lee, A., Ra, I., & Kim, H. (2009). Performance study of ad hoc routing protocols with gossip-based approach. In Proceedings of (CNS’09).

  15. Lee, A., Ra, I., & Kim, H. S. (2009). Performance study of ad hoc routing protocols with gossip-based approach. In Proceedings of (ACM SpringSim, CNS 2009) (p. 89).

  16. Marinoni, S., & Kari, H. H. (2006). Ad hoc routing protocol’s performance: A realistic simulation based study. Telecommunication Systems, 33, 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, M., Sengul, C., & Gupta, I. (2005). Exploring the energy-latency tradeoff for broadcasts in energy-saving sensor networks. In Proceedings of ( ICDCS’05) (pp. 17–26).

  18. Penrose, M. (2003). Random geometric graphs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Perkins, C. E., & Royer, E. M. (1999). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of ( WMCSA’99) (pp. 90–100).

  20. Royer, E. M., & Toh, C. K. (1999). A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 6(2), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. The Network Simulator, “NS-2.” Available: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

  22. Zhang, N., & Anpalagan, A. (2009). Sensitivity of SWAN QoS model in MANETs with proactive and reactive routing: A simulation study. Telecommunication Systems, 44, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anatolii A. Puhalskii, an associate professor in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences at the University of Colorado Denver, for explaining the relevant analysis of adaptive-gossiping routing algorithm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkyeun Ra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, A., Ra, I. Network resource efficient routing in mobile ad hoc wireless networks. Telecommun Syst 60, 215–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0024-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0024-7

Keywords

Navigation