Skip to main content
Log in

Pricing strategies and categories for LTE networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems will provide a large number of users with various high quality wireless Internet services including but not limited to voice over IP, real-time gaming, multimedia streaming and several others. A suitable pricing policy is an important component in order to bring benefits to both the operators and the customers. In fact, through this, the operator can efficiently manage the radio resources of cellular networks. For different types of services, the operator can maintain user Quality of Service and through which, the revenue can be optimized. This article analyzes various possible LTE pricing schemes, including the one proposed, based on different criteria: network load and congestion, operator revenue, traffic differentiation and user categorization. We provide comparative graphs to highlight the pros and cons of the studied pricing strategies. We highlight the importance for the operator to move from the often used flat-rate style policies towards more dynamic pricing strategies taking into account the user and service classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holma, H., & Toskala, A. (2011). LTE for UMTS: Evolution to LTE-advanced (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ku, G., & Walsh, J. M. (2015). Resource allocation and link adaptation in LTE and LTE advanced: A tutorial. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 17(3), 1605–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. OPENET White Paper. (2011). Guide to smarter data service tiers: Evolving tiered pricing for LTE & 3G+.

  4. Yankee Group. (2009). Thinking beyond flat-rate and stove-piped business models.

  5. Dasilva, L. A. (2000). Pricing for QoS-enabled networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 3, 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soldani, D., Jun, H. X., & Lück, B. (2011). Strategies for mobile broadband growth: Traffic segmentation for better customer experience. In IEEE VTC-Spring, Budapest (pp. 1–5) .

  7. Wallenius, E., & Hamalainen, T. (2002). Pricing model for 3G/4G networks. In IEEE PIMRC, Lisbon (pp. 187–191).

  8. Balbas, J.-J. P., Rommer, S., & Stenfelt, J. (2009). Policy and charging control in the evolved packet system. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ouellette, S., Martinez, B., & Pierre, S. (2011). A potential evolution of the policy and charging control/QoS architecture for the 3GPP IETF-based evolved packet core. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mir, U., & Nuaymi, L. (2012). Comparison of policy realization strategies for LTE networks. In 75th IEEE VTC-Fall, Quebec.

  11. Ibrahim, W., Chinneck, J. W., Periyalwar, S., & El-Sayed, H. (2005). QoS satisfaction based charging and resource management policy for next generation wireless networks. In International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, WCNM’05, Wuhan (pp. 868–873).

  12. Belghith, A., Nuaymi, L., & Maille, P. (2008). Pricing of real-time applications in WiMAX systems. In IEEE VTC-Fall, Calgary (pp. 21–24).

  13. Motorola White Paper. (2011). LTE flat rate pricing for competitive advantage.

  14. Mir, U., & Nuaymi, L. (2013). LTE pricing strategies. In IEEE VTC-Spring.

  15. Jaber, M., Dawy, Z., Akl, N., & Yaacoub, E. (2016). Tutorial on LTE/LTE–A cellular network dimensioning using iterative statistical analysis. In IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18, 1355–1383. (in print).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, M., Zhang, J., Ren, B., Yang, W., Zou, J., Hua, M., et al. (2016). The evolution of LTE physical layer control channels: A tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18, 1336–1354. (in print).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng, M. Y., Lin, G. Y., Wei, H. Y., & Hsu, A. C. C. (2012). Overload control for machine-type-communications in LTE-advanced system. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(6), 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soltanmohammadi, E., Ghavami, K., & Naraghi-Pour, M. (2016). A survey of traffic issues in machine-to-machine communications over LTE. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3, 865–884. (in print).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng, K., Hu, F., Wang, W., Xiang, W., & Dohler, M. (2012). Radio resource allocation in LTE-advanced cellular networks with M2M communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(7), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laya, A., Alonso, L., & Alonso-Zarate, J. (2014). Is the random access channel of LTE and LTE—A suitable for M2M communications? A survey of alternatives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gotsis, A. G., Lioumpas, A. S., & Alexiou, A. (2012). M2M scheduling over LTE: Challenges and new perspectives. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 7(3), 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morvari, F., & Ghasemi, A. (2016). Two-stage resource allocation for random access M2M communications in LTE network. IEEE Communications Letters, 20, 982–985. (in print).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usama Mir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mir, U., Nuaymi, L., Rehmani, M.H. et al. Pricing strategies and categories for LTE networks. Telecommun Syst 68, 183–192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0384-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0384-2

Keywords

Navigation