Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal routing and one hop routing for D2D communications in the presence of mutual interference

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of device to device (D2D) communications allows to increase the capacity of cellular systems. In such systems, a D2D pair directly communicate without passing through the base station and use the same frequency band. Therefore, this communication generates interference to the base station. In some contexts, the D2D pair are not close to each other and relaying should be performed. In this paper, we investigate the performance of different routing protocols for D2D communications. The network is composed of D2D pair, multiple relays organized in clusters, a cellular user communicating with a base station. In such network, there is interference from the relays to the base station and interference from the cellular user to the relays. We call it mutual interference. We investigate optimal and suboptimal routing for D2D communications in the presence of interference. Optimal routing consists to select the path among available ones with the largest end-to-end signal to interference plus noise ratio. A sub-optimal one-hop routing is also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Min, H., Seo, W., Lee, J., Park, S., & Hong, D. (2011). Reliability improvement using receive mode selection in the device-to-device uplink period underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(2), 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, W., Liang, L., Zhang, H., Jin, S., Li, J.C. F., & Lei, M. (2012). Performance enhanced transmission in device-to-device communications: beamforming or interference cancellation?. In GLOBECOM.

  3. Janis, P. (2009). Interference avoiding MIMO shemes for device-to-device radio underlaying cellular networks. In PIMRC.

  4. Min, H., Lee, J., Park, S., & Hong, D. (2011). Capcity enhancement using an interference limited area for device-to-device uplink underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(12), 3995–4000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, S., et al. (2010). Effective interference cancellation scheme for device to device communication underlaying cellular networks. In VTC.

  6. Chen, X., Song, L., Han, Z., Zhao, Q., Wang, X., Cheng, X., et al. (2013). Efficiency resource allocation for device-to-device underlay communication systems: A reverse iterative combinatorial auction based approach. IEEE JSAC, 31(9), 348–358.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, D., Lu, L., Yuan-Wu, Y., Li, G. Y., Feng, G., & Li, S. (2013). Device to device communications underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(8), 3541–3551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phunchongharm, P. (2013). Resource allocation for device to device communications underlaying LTE advanced networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janis, P., Koivunen, V., Ribeiro, C., Korhonen, J., Doppler, K., & Hugl, K. (2009). Interference aware resource allocation for device to device radio underlaying cellular networks. In VTC Spring.

  10. Yu, C. H. (2011). Resource sharing optimization for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless communications, 10(8), 2752–2763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, C., Song, L., Han, Z., Zhao, Q., Wang, X., & Jiao, B. (2012). Interference aware resource allocation for device to device communications as an underlay using sequential second price auction. In ICC.

  12. Zulhasnine, M. (2010). Efficient resource allocation for device to device communication underlaying LTE network. In IWCMC.

  13. Fodor, G., Dahlman, E., Mildh, G., Parkvall, S., Reider, Nt., Miklos, G., et al. (2012). Design aspects of network assisted device to device communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(3), 170–177.

  14. Wang, B., Chen, L., Chen, X., Zhang, X., & Yang, D. (2011). Resource allocation optimization for device to device communications underlaying cellular networks. In VTC spring.

  15. Zhang, R., Cheng, X., Yang, L., & Jiao, B. (2013). Interference-aware graph based resource sharing for device-to-device communications underlaying cellular networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC (pp. 140–145).

  16. Xu, C., Song, L., Han, Z., Li, D., & Jiao, B. (2012). Resource allocation using a reverse iterative combinatorial auction for device-to-device underlay cellular networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 4542–4547).

  17. Asadi, A., Wang, Q., & Mancuso, V. (2014). A survey on device-to-device communication in cellular networks. ArXiv, Jan. 2014.

  18. Xing, H., & Hakola, S. (2010). The investigation of power control schemes for a device to device communication integrated into OFDMA Cellular system. In PIMRC.

  19. Yu, C.-H., Tirkkonen, O., Doppler, K., & Ribeiro, C. (2009). On the performance of device to device underlay communication with simple power control. In VTC.

  20. Yu, C. H., Tirkkonen, O., Doppler, K., & Ribeiro, C. (2009). Power optimization of device to device communication underlaying cellular communication. In ICC.

  21. Xiao, X., Tao, X., & LuX, J. (2011). A QOS aware power optimization scheme in OFDMA systems integrated device to device (D2D) communications. In VTC.

  22. Doppler, K., Yu, C.-H., Ribeiro, C. B., & Janis, P. (2010). Mode selection for device to device communication underlaying an LTE advanced network. In WCNC.

  23. Doppler, K., Rinne, M. P., Janis, P., Ribeiro, C., & Hugl, K. (2009). Device to device communication: Functional prospects for LTE-advanced networks. In ICC.

  24. Lei, L. (2012). Operator controlled device to device communications in LTE advanced networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 19(3), 96–104.

  25. Doppler, K., Rinne, M., Wijting, C., Ribeiro, C. B., & Hugl, K. (2009). Device to device communications as an underlay to LTE advanced networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 22, 42–48.

  26. Nader, M. (2014). Device to Device communication in 5G cellular networks: Challenges, solutions and future directions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 86–92.

  27. Ma, X., Yin, R., Yu, G., & Zhang, Z. (2012). A distributed relay selection method for relay assisted device-to-device communication system. In Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, Sydney, Australia.

  28. Xia, W., Shao, S., & Sun, J. (2013). Relay selection strategy for device-to-device communication. In Proceedings of the IET international conference on information and communications technologies, Beijing, China (pp. 318–323).

  29. Ni, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2018). Beamforming and interference cancellation for D2D communication assisted by two-way decode-and-forward relay node. China Communications, 15(3), 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pradhan, A., Basu, S., Sarkar, S., Mitra, S., & Roy, S. D. (2018). Implementation of relay hopper model for reliable communication of IoT devices in LTE environment through D2D link. In 2018 10th international conference on communication systems and networks (COMSNETS) (pp. 569–572).

  31. Ateya, A. A., Muthanna, A., & Koucheryavy, A. (2018). 5G framework based on multi-level edge computing with D2D enabled communication. In 2018 20th international conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT) (p. 1).

  32. Yang, L., Wu, D., & Cai, Y. (2018). Social aware joint link and power allocation for D2D communication underlaying cellular networks. IET Communications, 12(5), 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, R., & Miao, Z. (2018). Hierarchical power allocation algorithm for D2D-based cellular networks with heterogeneous statistical quality-of-service constraints. IET Communications, 12(5), 518–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, X., Shankaran, R., Orgun, M., Fang, G., & Xu, Y. (2018). Resource allocation for underlay D2D communication with proportional fairness. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 99, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xing, W., Liu, F., Wang, C., Xiao, M., & Wang, P. (2018). Multi-source network-coded D2D cooperative content distribution systems. Journal of Communications and Networks, 20(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmed, M., Shi, H., Chen, X., Li, Y., Waqas, M., & Jin, D. (2018). Socially-aware secrecy-ensured resource allocation in D2D underlay communication: An overlapping coalitional game scheme. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(6), 4118–4133.

  37. Kim, J., & Molisch, A. (2014). Quality-aware millimiter wave device-to-device multi-hop routing for 5G cellular networks. In ICC.

  38. Laha, A., Cao, X., Shen, W., Tian, X., & Cheng, Y. (2015). An energy efficient routing protocol for device to device based multihop smartphone networks. In ICC.

  39. Taha, C., & Kadoch, M. (2014). Multipath routing algorithm for device-to-device communications for public safety over LTE heterogeneous networks. In ICT-DM.

  40. Shaikh, F. S., & Wismller, R. (2018). Routing in multi-hop cellular device-to-device (D2D) networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials.

  41. Xing, Y., & Seferoglu, H. (2017). Device-aware routing and scheduling in multi-hop Device-to-Device networks. In 2017 information theory and applications workshop (ITA), San Diego, CA (pp. 1–7).

  42. Hasna, M. O., & Alouini, M. S. (2003). Outage probability of multihop transmission over Nakagami fading channels. IEEE Communications Letters, 7(5), 216–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Boujemaa, H. (2009). Delay analysis of cooperative truncated HARQ with opportunistic relaying. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(9), 4795–4804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Boujemaa, H. (2009). Exact and asymptotic bit error probability of cooperative DS-CDMA systems using decode-and-forward relaying in the presence of multipath propagation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(9), 4464–4469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadhir Ben Halima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A

In the presence of interference from U cellular users, the SINR between two nodes X and Y is written as

$$\begin{aligned} \gamma _{X,Y}=\frac{E_{X}|h_{X,Y}|^{2}}{\sum _{i=1}^UE_{ci}|h_{ciY}|^{2}+N_{0}} \end{aligned}$$
(18)

where \(E_{ci}\) is the transmitted energy per symbol of cellular user i, \(h_{cY}\) is the channel coefficient between cellular user transmitter and node Y. \(I=\sum _{i=1}^UE_{ci}|h_{ciY}|^{2}\) represents interference at node Y from U cellular user.

The CDF of the SINR is written as

$$\begin{aligned} P(\gamma _{X,Y}<\gamma )=P(E_{X}|h_{X,Y}|^{2}<\gamma (I+N_{0})) \end{aligned}$$
(19)

Since Rayleigh fading channels are assumed, \(Z=E_{X}|h_{X,Y}|^{2}\) is exponentially distributed with mean \(\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}=E_{X}E(|h_{X,Y}|^{2})\). We denote by \(\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}=E_{ci}E(|h_{ciY}|^{2})\) where E(.) is the expectation.

Therefore, the CDF can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} F_{\gamma _{X,Y}}(\gamma )= & {} P(Z<\gamma (N_{0}+I)) \nonumber \\= & {} \int _{N_{0}}^{+\infty }F_{Z}(\gamma u)f_{I}(u-N_{0})du \end{aligned}$$
(20)

where \(F_{Z}(u)=P(Z<u)\) is the CDF of Z and \(f_{I}(u)\) is the PDF of I.

I is the sum of exponential random variables. The PDF of I can be obtained using the Moment Generating Function (MGF) of sum of independent random variable that is the product of individual MGF. Using the results of [44], we have

$$\begin{aligned} f_{I}(u)=\sum _{i=1}^U \frac{res_i }{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}}e^{-\frac{u}{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}}} \end{aligned}$$
(21)

where \(res_i\) are the residues given by

$$\begin{aligned} res_i=\prod _{k\ne i, k=1}^U \frac{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}}{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}-\sigma _{ck,Y}^{2}} \end{aligned}$$
(22)

We deduce

$$\begin{aligned} F_{\gamma _{X,Y}}(\gamma )= & {} \int _{N_{0}}^{+\infty }\left[ 1-e^{-\frac{ \gamma u}{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}}}\right] \sum _{i=1}^U res_i e^{-\frac{(u-N_{0})}{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}}}\frac{1}{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}}du \nonumber \\= & {} 1-\sum _{i=1}^U res_i\frac{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}}{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}+\gamma \sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}} e^{-\frac{N_{0}\gamma }{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}}} \end{aligned}$$
(23)

By a simple derivative, we obtain the PDF of SINR \(\Gamma _{X,Y}\)

$$\begin{aligned} f_{\gamma _{X,Y}}(\gamma )= & {} \sum _{i=1}^U res_i \left[ \frac{N_{0}}{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}+\gamma \sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}}e^{-\frac{N_{0}\gamma }{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}}} \right. \nonumber \\&\quad \left. +\frac{\sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}}{\left( \sigma _{X,Y}^{2}+\gamma \sigma _{ci,Y}^{2}\right) ^{2}}e^{-\frac{N_{0}\gamma }{\sigma _{X,Y}^{2}}}\right] \end{aligned}$$
(24)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Halima, N., Boujemâa, H. Optimal routing and one hop routing for D2D communications in the presence of mutual interference. Telecommun Syst 71, 55–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0512-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0512-7

Keywords

Navigation