Abstract
Distributed mobility management (DMM), which is a promising mobility management protocol, is designed for flattening the network architecture to resolve the problems of scalability and reliability existed in mobile Internet. Although software defined network (SDN) has been applied to network-based mobility protocols to enhance the performance, the current network-based mobility management schemes still suffer the high signaling cost, handover delay and packet loss during the handover processing. In this paper, an software defined network (SDN)-based fast handover with the optimal routing control method for distributed mobility management (DMM) was proposed. SDN-FHOR-DMM can (i) let MNs have the higher chance of being in the predictive mode, in which the handover preparation processing can be finished before MN disconnecting from the current Mobility Anchor and Access Router’s (MAAR’s) domain and connecting with the new MAAR’s domain, (ii) support the optimal routing between MN and corresponding node (CN) through the help of the SDN Controller to have the optimal transmission path for the on-going packets from CN to MN to improve the handover performance. The performance analysis has shown that the proposed SDN-FHOR-DMM method has the better performance than the traditional DMM method and other method in terms of signaling overhead, handover latency, throughput and packets loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shafi, M., et al. (2017). 5G: A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and practice. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(6), 1201–1221.
Jeon, S., Figueiredo, S., Aguiar, R. L., & Choo, H. (2017). Distributed mobility management for the future mobile networks: A comprehensive analysis of key design options. IEEE Access, 5, 11423–11436.
Cominardi, L., Giust, F., Bernardos, C. J., & De La Oliva, A. (2017). Distributed mobility management solutions for next mobile network architectures. Computer Networks, 121, 124–136.
Koodli R. (2009). Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers (No. RFC 5568).
Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury, K., & Patil, B. (2008). Proxy mobile ipv6 (No. RFC 5213).
Liu, D., Zuniga, J. C., Seite, P., Chan, H., & Bernardos, C. J. (2015). Distributed mobility management: Current practices and gap analysis (No. RFC 7429).
Peña Llerena, Y., Gondim, P. R., & Lloret, J. (2018). Improving throughput in DMM with mobile assisted flow mobility. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 29(3), e3257.
Bernardos, C. J., De la Oliva, A., & Giust, F. (2017). A PMIPv6-based solution for distributed mobility management. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress), draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip, 2017.
D’Angelo, G., Ferretti, S., & Ghini, V. (2018). Distributed hybrid simulation of the Internet of things and smart territories. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30(9), e4370, pp. 1–20.
Ernest, P. P., Falowo, O. E., & Chan, H. A. (2016). Design and performance evaluation of distributed mobility management schemes for network mobility. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 61, 46–58.
Huang, C. M., Dao, D. T., & Chiang, M. S. (2018). A bursty multi-node handover scheme for mobile internet using the partially distributed mobility management (BMH–DMM) architecture. Telecommunication Systems, 1–18.
Balfaqih, M., Ismail, M., Nordin, R., Rahem, A. A., & Balfaqih, Z. (2017). Fast handover solution for network-based distributed mobility management in intelligent transportation systems. Telecommunication Systems, 64(2), 325–346.
Jeon, S., Kang, N., Corujo, D., & Aguiar, R. L. (2015). Comprehensive performance evaluation of distributed and dynamic mobility routing strategy. Computer Networks, 79, 53–67.
Guck, J. W., Van Bemten, A., Reisslein, M., & Kellerer, W. (2018). Unicast QoS routing algorithms for SDN: A comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), 388–415.
Farris, I., Taleb, T., Khettab, Y., & Song, J. S. (2018). A survey on emerging SDN and NFV security mechanisms for IoT systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2018.2862350.
Yin, X., Wang, L., & Jiang, S. (2018). A hierarchical mobility management scheme based on software defined networking. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-017-0615-z.
Sun, S., Han, L., Jin, X., & Han, S. (2017). NAPT-based mobility service for software defined networks. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 100(5), 932–938.
Bradai, A., Benslimane, A., & Singh, K. D. (2015). Dynamic anchor points selection for mobility management in Software Defined Networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 57, 1–11.
Yokota, H., Chowdhury, K., Koodli, R., Patil, B., & Xia, F. (2010). Fast handovers for proxy mobile IPv6 (No. RFC 5949).
Chiang, M. S., & Huang, C. M. (2018). A backward fast handover control scheme for mobile internet (BFH-MIPv6). Journal of Internet Technology, 19(2), 359–367.
Chiang, M. S., Huang, C. M., Dao, D. T., & Pham, B. C. (2018). The backward fast media independent handover for proxy mobile IPv6 control scheme (BFMIH-PMIPV6) over heterogeneous wireless mobile networks. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 34(3), 765–780.
Balfaqih, M., Ismail, M., Nordin, R., & Balfaqih, Z. A. (2017). 802.21-assisted distributed mobility management solution in vehicular networks. IEEE Access, 5, 9518–9532.
Wang, Y., & Bi, J. (2014, August). A solution for IP mobility support in software defined networks. In Proceeding of 2014 IEEE 23rd computer communication and networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1–8).
Wang, Y., Bi, J., & Zhang, K. (2015). Design and implementation of a software-defined mobility architecture for IP networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 20(1), 40–52.
Raza, S. M., Kim, D. S., & Choo, H. (2014, January). Leveraging PMIPv6 with SDN. In Proceedings of the ACM 8th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication (ICUIMC), (pp. 1–8).
Raza, S. M., Thorat, P., Challa, R., & Choo, H. (2017, January). On demand inter domain mobility in SDN based Proxy Mobile IPv6. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE information networking (ICOIN) (pp. 194–199).
Kim, Y. H., Lim, H. K., Kim, K. H., & Han, Y. H. (2017). A SDN-based distributed mobility management in LTE/EPC network. The Journal of Supercomputing, 73(7), 2919–2933.
Jabir, A. J., Shamala, S., Zuriati, Z., & Hamid, N. (2018). A comprehensive survey of the current trends and extensions for the proxy mobile IPv6 protocol. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(1), 1065–1081.
Wang, X., Lei, X., Fan, P., Hu, R. Q., & Horng, S. J. (2014). Cost analysis of movement-based location management in PCS networks: An embedded Markov chain approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(4), 1886–1902.
Lee, J. H., Bonnin, J. M., You, I., & Chung, T. M. (2013). Comparative handover performance analysis of IPv6 mobility management protocols. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(3), 1077–1088.
Pack, S., Shen, X. S., Mark, J. W., & Pan, J. (2007). Adaptive route optimization in hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8, 903–914.
Lee, J. H., Ernst, T., & Chilamkurti, N. (2012). Performance analysis of PMIPv6-based network mobility for intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(1), 74–85.
Network Simulator NS3, https://www.nsnam.org.
Ammar, D., Begin, T., & Guerin-Lassous, I. (2011). A new tool for generating realistic internet traffic in ns-3. In Proceedings of the 4th ICST international conference on simulation tools and techniques, (pp. 81–83).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Ministry Of Science and Technology (MOST) of the Republic of China, Taiwan, under the contract number MOST 107-2221-E-006-139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, CM., Dao, DT. & Chiang, MS. SDN-FHOR-DMM: a software defined network (SDN)-based fast handover with the optimal routing control method for distributed mobility management (DMM). Telecommun Syst 72, 157–177 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00567-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00567-7