Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Compressive sensing-based energy consumption model for data gathering techniques in wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have found many applications in a variety of topics. The main objective in WSNs is to measure environmental phenomena and send reading data to the sink in multi-hop paths. The most important challenge in WSNs is to minimize energy consumption in the sensor nodes and increase the network lifetime. One of the most effective techniques for reducing energy consumption in WSNs is the compressive sensing (CS) which has recently been considered by the researchers. CS reduces the network energy consumption by reducing the number and size of transmitted data packets over the network. On the other hand, in order to overcome the challenge of energy consumption in the network, it is necessary to identify and analyze the energy consumption resources of the network. Although many models have been proposed for energy consumption analysis in the WSN, but these models were not based on the CS technique. Therefore, we have proposed a complete model in this work for energy consumption analysis in various CS-based data gathering techniques in WSNs. This model can be very effective in energy consumption optimization when designing a CS-based data gathering technique for WSN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(14), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiong, Z., Liveris, A., & Cheng, S. (2004). Distributed source coding for sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 21(5), 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, J., & Cheng, W. (2012). Fuzzy-logic-based clustering approach for wireless sensor networks using energy predication. IEEE Sensors Journal, 12(9), 2891–2897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zahhad, M. A., Amin, O., Farrag, M., & Ali, A. (2015). An energy consumption model for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE 5th international conference on energy aware computing systems & applications, Egypt, March 2015.

  5. Haupt, J., Bajwa, W., Rabbat, M., & Nowak, R. (2008). Compressed sensing for networked data. Signal Processing Magazine, 25(2), 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahmudimanesh, M., Khelil, A., & Suri, N. (2012). Balanced spatio-temporal compressive sensing for multi-hop wireless sensornetworks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th international conference on mobile ad hoc and sensor systems, USA, Oct. 2012.

  7. Qin, Z., Fan, J., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., & Li, G. Y. (2018). Sparse representation for wireless communications: A compressive sensing approach. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(3), 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quan, L., Xiao, S., Xue, X., & Lu, C. (2016). Neighbor-aided spatial-temporal compressive data gathering in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communication Letters, 14(3), 578–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Candes, E., & Wakin, M. (2008). An introduction to compressive sampling. Signal Processing Magazine, 25(2), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakin, M. B., Duarte, M. F., Sarvotham, S., Baron, D., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2009). Recovery of jointly sparse signals from few random. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM MobiCom, Beijing, China (pp. 145–156).

  11. Tropp, J., & Gilbert, A. (2007). Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(12), 4655–4666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kulkarni, A., & Mohsenin, T. (2017). Low overhead architectures for OMP compressive sensing reconstruction algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 64(6), 1468–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Donoho, D. L., Elad, M., & Temlyakov, V. N. (2006). Stable recovery of sparse over complete representations in the presence of noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yadav, S., & Kumar, V. (2019). Hybrid compressive sensing enabled energy efficient transmission of multi-hop clustered UWSNs. International Journal of Electronics and Communications (AEÜ), 110, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Candes, E., & Romberg, J. (2007). Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling. Inverse Problems, 23(3), 969–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehrjoo, S., & Khunjush, F. (2018). Accurate compressive data gathering in wireless sensor networks using weighted spatio-temporal compressive sensing. Telecommunication Systems, 68(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ali, B., Pissinou, N., & Makki, K. (2009). Identification and validation of spatio-temporal associations in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the SENSORCOMM, Athens, Greece, Jun. 2009 (pp. 496–501).

  18. Tayeh, G. B., Makhoul, A., Perera, C., & Demerjian, J. (2019). A spatial-temporal correlation approach for data reduction in cluster-based sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7, 50669–50680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cai, W., & Zhang, M. (2018). Spatio-temporal correlation–based adaptive sampling algorithm for clustered wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 14(8), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, D., Nie, L., Lv, Z., & Song, H. (2016). Spatio-temporal Kronecker compressive sensing for traffic matrix recovery. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 4, 3046–3053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gong, B., Cheng, P., Chen, Z., Liu, N., Gui, L., & de Hoog, F. (2015). Spatio-temporal compressive network coding for energy-efficient distributed data storage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communication Letters, 19(5), 803–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leinonen, M., & Member, S. (2015). Sequential compressed sensing with progressive signal reconstruction in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, 14(3), 1622–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duarte, M., & Baraniuk, R. (2010). Kronecker product matrices for compressive sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and  signal processing, Dallas, TX, USA (pp. 3650–3653).

  24. Haque, M., Ahmad, A.,&Imran, M. (2017). Review of hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the intelligent communication and computational technologies (pp. 237–246).

  25. Shafiq, M., Ashraf, H., Ullah, A., & Tahira, S. (2020). Systematic literature review on energy efficient routing schemes in WSN: A survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 25(1), 882–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan, L., Chavez, K. G., Rudolph, H., & Hourani, A. (2020). Hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor network: A compressive survey. Wireless Networks, 26(1), 3291–3314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Purkait, R., & Tripathi, S. (2016). Energy aware fuzzy based multi-hop routing protocol using unequal clustering. Wireless Personal Communications, 94, 809–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lan, K. C., & Wei, M. Z. (2017). A compressibility-based clustering algorithm for hierarchical compressive data gathering. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(8), 2550–2562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo, C., et al. (2009). Compressive data gathering for large-scale wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking (Mobicom) (pp. 145–156).

  30. Xie, R., & Jia, X. (2014). Transmission-efficient clustering method for wireless sensor networks using compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(3), 806–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, X., Ansari, R., Khokhar, A., & Vacilacos, A. V. (2015). Hierarchical data aggregation using compressive sensing (HDACS) in WSNs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 11(3), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Majma, M. R., Pedram, H., & Dehghan, M. (2014). IGBDD: Intelligent grid based data dissemination protocol for mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 78(1), 687–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Soni, V., & Mallick, D. K. (2017). FTGAF-HEX: Fuzzy logic based two level geographic routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Microsystem Technology, 23(8), 3443–3455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghaderi, M. R., Tabataba Vakili, V., & Sheikhan, M. (2020). FGAF-CDG: Fuzzy geographic routing protocol based on compressive data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(3), 2567–2589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pacharaney, U. S., & Gupta, R. K. (2019). Clustering and compressive data gathering in wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 109, 1311–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abo-Zahhad, M., Amin, O., Farrag, M., & Ali, A. (2014). Survey on energy consumption models in wireless sensor networks. Open Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(1), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karakus, C., Gurbuz, A. C., & Tavli, B. (2013). Analysis of energy efficiency of compressive sensing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(5), 1999–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Luo, J., Xiang, L., & Rosenberg, C. (2010). Does compressed sensing improve the throughput of wireless sensor networks? In Proceeding of the IEEE international conference on communications, Cape Town, South Africa.

  39. Ali, A., Abo-Zahhad, M., & Farrag, M. (2017). Modeling of wireless sensor networks with minimum energy consumption. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42(7), 2631–2639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou, C., Wang, M., Qu, W., & Lu, Z. (2018). A wireless sensor network model considering energy consumption balance. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8592821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cui, S., Cao, Y., Sun, G., & Bin, S. (2018). A new energy-aware wireless sensor network evolution model based on complex network. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2018, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1240-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu, L., Ci, B., Liu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2015). Data gathering in wireless sensor networks based on reshuffling cluster compressed sensing. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 11, 11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/260913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application- specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu, X., & Wu, J. (2020). A method for energy balance and data transmission optimal routing in wireless sensor networks. Sensors (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Valle-Soto, C. D., Mex-Perera, C., Nolazco-Flores, J. A., Velázquez, R., & Rossa-Sierra, A. (2020). Wireless sensor network energy model and its use in the optimization of routing protocols. Sensors, 13(3), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vales-Alonso, J., Egea-Lopez, E., Martínez-Sala, A., Pavon-Marino, P., Bueno-Delgado, M. V., & García-Haro, J. (2007). Performance evaluation of MAC transmission power control in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 51(6), 1483–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Djiroun, F. Z., & Djenouri, D. (2017). MAC protocols with wake-up radio for wireless sensor networks: A review. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(1), 587–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rasul, A., & Erlebach, T. (2014). Reducing idle listening during data collection in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on mobile ad-hoc and sensor networks, Maui, HI, USA.

  49. Minh, N. N., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Reducing idle listening time in pipeline-forwarding MAC protocols of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC), Hanoi, Vietnam.

  50. Lee, S. H., & Choi, L. (2017). Zero MAC: Toward a zero sleep delay and zero idle listening media access control protocol with ultralow power radio frequency wakeup sensor. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(8), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Ghaderi, Vahid Tabataba Vakili & Mansour Sheikhan

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Vahid Tabataba Vakili

Authors
  1. Mohammad Reza Ghaderi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vahid Tabataba Vakili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mansour Sheikhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Tabataba Vakili.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghaderi, M.R., Tabataba Vakili, V. & Sheikhan, M. Compressive sensing-based energy consumption model for data gathering techniques in wireless sensor networks. Telecommun Syst 77, 83–108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-020-00748-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-020-00748-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation