Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An energy efficient clustering with enhanced chicken swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive position routing protocol in mobile adhoc network

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), when nodes sporadically visit every path, limiting battery life and leading to frequent topology changes, mobility awareness and energy efficiency are seen as two crucial advantages. The Enhanced Flock Optimization method, which was suggested by the Adaptive Location Routing Protocol method, is used to address these MANET issues. The powerful Chicken Swarm Optimization (CSO) algorithm is one of the most effective intelligent optimization approaches for handling global optimization issues. Applying an individual sigmoid function to flock optimization discretizes the problem. However, in complex GOPs with numerous defects, the CSO algorithm might not perform as predicted, invariably resulting in local minima. With the help of the biologically inspired algorithm Enhanced Chicken Swarm Optimization (ECSO), chicks are divided into smaller groups to mimic the foraging behaviour of a flock of chickens. Each subgroup iterates simultaneously toward the ideal group, with each member contributing something new. Thus, the concept of ECSO’s use in the cluster head selection process was inspired by it. The Adaptive Position Routing Protocol (APRP) strategy recommended for cluster leaders also makes advantage of network coding to minimize the number of broadcasts. Utilizing the parameters of energy efficiency, packet transmission rate, network throughput, and sensor node lifetime, the suggested strategy outperforms the alternatives. The simulation is performed as 20 times with same simulation parameter. As a consequence, the examination revealed that the average energy efficiency was 91.65% and the average packet transfer rate was 99.56%, lower average end-to-end latency to 270.68 ms. The ECSO-APRP protocol has a 576 average packet loss and average throughput of 691.87 Kbps for 500 nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated or analyzed during the current study is not publicly available due to restrictions in the ethical permit, but may be available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Agarkhed, J., Dattatraya, P. Y., & Patil, S. (2021). Multi-QoS constraint multipath routing in cluster-based wireless sensor network. International Journal of Information Technology, 13(3), 865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karpagalakshmi, R. C., Vijayalakshmi, P., Gowsic, K., & Rathi, R. (2021). An effective traffic management system using connected dominating set forwarding (CDSF) framework for reducing traffic congestion in high density VANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 119, 2725–2754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahajan, H. B., & Badarla, A. (2021). Cross-layer protocol for WSNassisted IoT smart farming applications using nature inspired algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08866-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nandan, A. S., Singh, S., & Awasthi, L. K. (2021). An efficient cluster head election based on optimized genetic algorithm for movable sinks in IoT enabled HWSNs. Applied Soft Computing, 107, 107318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nilabar Nisha, U., Manikandan, A., Venkataramanan, C., & Dhanapal, R. (2023). A score based link delay aware routing protocol to improve energy optimization in wireless sensor network. Journal of Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100115

  6. Moussa, N., & El Alaoui, A. E. B. (2021). An energy-efficient cluster-based routing protocol using unequal clustering and improved ACO techniques for WSNs. Peer-to Peer Networking and Applications, 14(3), 1334–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Natarajan, V. P., & Thandapani, K. (2021). Adaptive time difference of time of arrival in wireless sensor network routing for enhancing quality of service. Instrumentation Mesure Métrologie, 20(6), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.18280/i2m.200602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulla, P. (2022). Traffic sign detection and recognition based on convolutional neural network. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 10(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v10i4.5533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biswas, K., Vasant, P. M., Vintaned, J. A. G., & Watada, J. (2021). Cellular automata-based multiobjective hybrid Grey Wolf Optimization and particle swarm optimization algorithm for wellbore trajectory optimization. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 85, 103695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal, D. A. (2022). Advancing privacy and security of internet of things to find integrated solutions. International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science and Communication Engineering, 8(2), 05–08. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijfrcsce.v8i2.2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ntakolia, C., & Iakovidis, D. K. (2021). A swarm intelligence graph-based pathfinding algorithm (SIGPA) for multi-objective route planning. Computers & Operations Research, 133, 105358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rishiwal, V., Yadav, P., Singh, O., & Prasad, B. G. (2021). Optimizing energy consumption in IoT-based scalable wireless sensor networks. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), 10(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shafiq, M., Ashraf, H., Ullah, A., Masud, M., Azeem, M., Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Humayun, M. (2021). Robust cluster-based routing protocol for IoT-assisted smart devices in WSN. CMC-Computers Materials & Continua, 67(3), 3505–3521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Srilakshmi, U., Veeraiah, N., Alotaibi, Y., Alghamdi, S. A., Khalaf, O. I., & Subbayamma, B. V. (2021). An improved hybrid secure multipath routing protocol for MANET. IEEE Access, 9, 163043–163053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Joy, P., Thanka, R., & Edwin, B. (2022). Smart self-pollination for future agricultural-a computational structure for micro air vehicles with man-made and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(2), 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wala, T., Chand, N., & Sharma, A. K. (2021). Identification of optimal location points for efficient data gathering in IoT environment. International Journal of Communication Systems., 34(11), e4843. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, N. A., Kavitha, A., Venkatramana, P., & Nandan, D. (2022). Architecture design: Network-on-chip. In B. K. Mohanty, R. K. Arya, D. Nandan, & S. Kumar (Eds.), VLSI Architecture for signal, speech, and image processing (pp. 147–165). Apple Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Gopalan, S. H. (2021). ZHRP-DCSEI, a novel hybrid routing protocol for mobile Ad-hoc networks to optimize energy using dynamic cuckoo search algorithm. Wireless PersCommun, 118, 3289–3301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08180-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khatoon, N., Pranav, P., Roy, S., & Amritanjali. (2021). FQ-MEC: Fuzzy-Based Q-learning approach for mobility-aware energy-efficient clustering in MANET. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8874632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Subburayalu, G., Duraivelu, H., Raveendran, A. P., Arunachalam, R., Kongara, D., & Thangavel, C. (2021). (2021) Cluster based malicious node detection system for mobile Ad-Hoc network using ANFIS classifier. Journal of Applied Security Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.2002118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkataramanan, C., Ramalingam, S., & Manikandan, A. (2021). LWBA: Lévy-walk bat algorithm based data prediction for precision agriculture in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems., 41, 2891–2904. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Neelakandan, S., Arun, A., Bhukya, R. R., Hardas, B. M., Anil Kumar, T. C., & Ashok, M. (2022). An automated word embedding with parameter tuned model for web crawling. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 32(3), 1617–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jain, D. K., Tyagi, S. K. S., Neelakandan, S., Prakash, M., & Natrayan, L. (2022). Metaheuristic optimization-based resource allocation technique for Cybertwin-driven 6G on IoE environment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(7), 4884–4892. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3138915

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding received by any government or private concern.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mahendra College of Engineering, Salem, 636106, India

    R. Reka

  2. SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, India

    A. Manikandan

  3. Department of ECE, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore, India

    C. Venkataramanan

  4. Kongunadu College of Engineering and Technology, Trichy, India

    R. Madanachitran

Authors
  1. R. Reka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Manikandan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Venkataramanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Madanachitran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Reka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reka, R., Manikandan, A., Venkataramanan, C. et al. An energy efficient clustering with enhanced chicken swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive position routing protocol in mobile adhoc network. Telecommun Syst 84, 183–202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation