Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed neuro-fuzzy routing for energy-efficient IoT smart city applications in WSN

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) enable seamless data gathering and communication, facilitating efficient and real-time decision-making in IoT monitoring applications. However, the energy required to maintain communication in WSN-based IoT networks poses significant challenges, such as packet loss, packet drop, and rapid energy depletion. These issues reduce network life and performance, increasing the risk of delayed packet delivery. To address these challenges, this work presents a novel energy-efficient distributed neuro-fuzzy routing model executed in two stages to enhance communication efficiency and energy management in WSN-based IoT applications. In the first stage, nodes with high energy levels are predicted using a fusion of distributed learning with neural networks and fuzzy logic. In the second stage, clustering and routing are performed based on the predicted eligible nodes, incorporating thresholds for energy and distance with two combined metrics. The cluster head (CH) combined metric optimizes cluster head selection, while the next-hop combined metric facilitates efficient multi-hop communication. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly enhances network lifetime compared to EANFR, RBFNN T2F, and TTDFP by 9.48%, 25%, and 31.5%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Algorithm 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availibility statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ACK:

Acknowledgment

ADV:

Advertisement

ANFIS:

Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system

BS:

Base station

CH:

Cluster head

CCHs:

Candidate cluster heads

DNN:

Deep neural network

EANFR:

Energy-aware neuro fuzzy routing

EEDC:

Energy efficient dynamic clustering

FedAVG:

Federated average

FND, HND, LND:

First node died, half node died, last node died

LEACH:

Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchical

SEP:

Stable election protocol

I-SEP:

Improved stable election protocol

GA:

Genetics algorithm

MF:

Membership function

NN:

Neural network

NFL:

Neuro-fuzzy learning

PDR:

Packet delivery ratio

RBFNN:

Radial basis function neural network

RFCM-GA:

Rough fuzzy c means and genetic algorithm

ReLU:

Rectified linear unit

T2F:

Type 2 fuzzy

TTDFP:

Two tier distributed fuzzy protocol

References

  1. Lazarescu, M. T. (2013). Design of a WSN platform for long-term environmental monitoring for IoT applications. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 3(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2243032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shafique, T., Gantassi, R., Soliman, A.-H., Amjad, A., Hui, Z.-Q., & Choi, Y. (2023). A review of energy hole mitigating techniques in multi-hop many to one communication and its significance in IoT oriented smart city infrastructure. IEEE Access, 11, 121340–121367. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3327311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Naeem, M. K., Patwary, M., & Abdel-Maguid, M. (2017). Universal and dynamic clustering scheme for energy constrained cooperative wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 5, 12318–12337. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2655345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cengiz, K., & Dag, T. (2018). Energy aware multi-hop routing protocol for WSNs. IEEE Access, 6, 2622–2633. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2784542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khalil, R. A., Saeed, N., Masood, M., Fard, Y. M., Alouini, M.-S., & Al-Naffouri, T. Y. (2021). Deep learning in the industrial internet of things: Potentials, challenges, and emerging applications. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(14), 11016–11040. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3051414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El Mokadem, R., Ben Maissa, Y., & El Akkaoui, Z. (2023). Federated learning for energy constrained devices: A systematic mapping study. Cluster Comput, 26, 1685–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03763-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018). Securing fog computing for Internet of Things applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 20(1), 601–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2762345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mertens, J. S., Galluccio, L., & Morabito, G. (2022). MGM-4-FL: Combining federated learning and model gossiping in WSNs. Computer Networks, 214, 109144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gamal, M., Mekky, N. E., Soliman, H. H., & Hikal, N. A. (2022). Enhancing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks using fuzzy logic LEACH technique-based particle swarm optimization. IEEE Access, 10, 36935–36948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3163254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2002.804190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, M.-Y., Ding, J., Chen, W.-P., & Guan, W.-Q. (2015). SEARCH: A stochastic election approach for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(3), 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2391100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Behera, T. M., Mohapatra, S. K., Samal, U. C., Khan, M. S., Daneshmand, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020). I-SEP: An improved routing protocol for heterogeneous WSN for IoT-based environmental monitoring. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(1), 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2940988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sert, S. A., Alchihabi, A., & Yazici, A. (2018). A two-tier distributed fuzzy logic based protocol for efficient data aggregation in multihop wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3615–3629. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2841369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rasi, D., & Deepa, S. N. (2021). Energy optimization of internet of things in wireless sensor network models using type-2 fuzzy neural systems. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34, e4967. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qu, Z., Xu, H., Zhao, X., Tang, H., Wang, J., & Li, B. (2021). An energy-efficient dynamic clustering protocol for event monitoring in large-scale WSN. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(20), 23614–23625. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3103384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeevanantham, S., & Rebekka, B. (2022). Energy-aware neuro-fuzzy routing model for WSN based-IoT. Telecommunication Systems, 81, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-022-00955-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ali, H., Tariq, U. U., Hussain, M., Lu, L., Panneerselvam, J., & Zhai, X. (2021). ARSH-FATI: A novel metaheuristic for cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Systems Journal, 15(2), 2386–2397. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.2986811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong, Y., Guo, X., & Lai, G. (2023). A centralized energy-efficient clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(2), 1623–1634. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3224180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hemavathi, N., Meenalochani, M., & Sudha, S. (2020). Influence of received signal strength on prediction of cluster head and number of rounds. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 69(6), 3739–3749. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2932652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., & He, B. (2023). A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4), 3347–3366. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3124599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkatesan, C., Jeevanantham, S., & Rebekka, B. (2024). Energy-aware federated learning for AQI pollutants forecasting in edge networks. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2024.3398795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsang, Y. P., Wu, C. H., & Dong, N. (2023). A federated-ANFIS for collaborative intrusion detection in securing decentralized autonomous organizations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3304409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang, J.-S.R. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, L., Shi, Y., Chang, Y.-C., & Lin, C.-T. (2023). Robust fuzzy neural network with an adaptive inference engine. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2023.3241170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, H.-X., & Liu, Z. (2008). A probabilistic neural-fuzzy learning system for stochastic modeling. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16(4), 898–908. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.917302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guzel, M., Kok, I., Akay, D., & Ozdemir, S. (2020). ANFIS and deep learning based missing sensor data prediction in IoT. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(2), e5400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Suresh, S. S., Prabhu, V., Parthasarathy, V., Senthilkumar, G., & Gundu, V. (2024). Intelligent data routing strategy based on federated deep reinforcement learning for IOT-enabled wireless sensor networks. Measurement: Sensors, 31, 101012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Behera, T. M., Mohapatra, S. K., Samal, U. C., & Khan, M. S. (2019). Hybrid heterogeneous routing scheme for improved network performance in WSNs for animal tracking. Internet of Things, 6, 100047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pundir, S., Wazid, M., Singh, D. P., Das, A. K., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Park, Y. (2020). Intrusion detection protocols in wireless sensor networks integrated to Internet of Things deployment: Survey AND FUTURE CHALLENGES. IEEE Access, 8, 3343–3363. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaur, G., Chanak, P., & Bhattacharya, M. (2021). Energy-efficient intelligent routing scheme for IoT-enabled WSNs. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(14), 11440–11449. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3051768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Olatinwo, D. D., Abu-Mahfouz, A. M., Hancke, G. P., & Myburgh, H. C. (2023). Energy efficient priority-based hybrid MAC protocol for IoT-enabled WBAN systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(12), 13524–13538. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3273427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bi, H., Sun, Y., Liu, J., & Cao, L. (2022). SmartEar: Rhythm-based tap authentication using earphone in information-centric wireless sensor network. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(2), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3063479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, J., Guo, S., Guo, J., Zeng, D., Zhou, J., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2023). Towards data-independent knowledge transfer in model-heterogeneous federated learning. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 72(10), 2888–2901. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2023.3272801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sheikh, A. M., & Joshi, S. (2024). Improved smart energy-based routing approach for IoT networks in wireless sensor nodes. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 71, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00435-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh, A., & Nagaraju, A. (2020). Low latency and energy efficient routing-aware network coding-based data transmission in multi-hop and multi-sink WSN. Ad Hoc Networks, 107, 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Methodology, Software, analysis and original draft preparation were performed by SJ. The final draft of the manuscript was supervised, reviewed and edited by BR. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Jeevanantham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no Conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeevanantham, S., Venkatesan, C. & Rebekka, B. Distributed neuro-fuzzy routing for energy-efficient IoT smart city applications in WSN. Telecommun Syst 87, 497–516 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-024-01195-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-024-01195-6

Keywords