Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Characterisation of Signal Modality: Exploiting Signal Nonlinearity in Machine Learning and Signal Processing

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel method for online tracking of the changes in the nonlinearity within both real-domain and complex–valued signals is introduced. This is achieved by a collaborative adaptive signal processing approach based on a hybrid filter. By tracking the dynamics of the adaptive mixing parameter within the employed hybrid filtering architecture, we show that it is possible to quantify the degree of nonlinearity within both real- and complex-valued data. Implementations for tracking nonlinearity in general and then more specifically sparsity are illustrated on both benchmark and real world data. It is also shown that by combining the information obtained from hybrid filters of different natures it is possible to use this method to gain a more complete understanding of the nature of the nonlinearity within a signal. This also paves the way for building multidimensional feature spaces and their application in data/information fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The DVV method is a test for signal nonlinearity. For more detail, see [5, 10].

  2. The wind data with speed v and direction φ were made complex as v = ve iφ [11].

References

  1. Arenas-Garcia, J., Figueiras-Vidal, A., & Sayed, A. (2005). Steady state performance of convex combinations of adaptive filters. In Proceedings IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP ’05) (Vol. 4, pp. 33–36).

  2. Arenas-Garcia, J., Figueiras-Vidal, A., & Sayed, A. (2006). Mean-square performance of a convex combination of two adaptive filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(3), 1078–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, M., Rutkowski, T., Jelfs, B., Souretis, G., Cao, J., & Mandic, D. (2007). Assessment of nonlinearity in brain electrical activity: A DVV approach. In Proceedings RISP international workshop on nonlinear circuits and signal processing.

  4. Cichocki, A., & Unbehauen, R. (1993). Neural networks for optimisation and signal processing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gautama, T., Mandic, D., & Van Hulle, M. (2004). The delay vector variance method for detecting determinism and nonlinearity in time series. Physica D, 190(3–4), 167–176.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jelfs, B., & Mandic, D. (2008). Signal modality characterisation using collaborative adaptive filters. In Proceedings IAPR workshop on cognitive information processing.

  7. Jelfs, B., Vayanos, P., Chen, M., Goh, S., Boukis, C., Gautama, T., et al. (2006). An online method for detecting nonlinearity within a signal. In Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems (pp. 1216–1223).

  8. Kozat, S., & Singer, A. (2000). Multi-stage adaptive signal processing algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE sensor array and multichannel signal processing workshop (pp. 380–384).

  9. Mandic, D. (2000). NNGD algorithm for neural adaptive filters. Electronics Letters, 36(9), 845–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandic, D., Chen, M., Gautama, T., Van Hulle, M., & Constantinides, A. (2008). On the characterisation of the deterministic/stochastic and linear/nonlinear nature of time series. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 464(2093), 1141–1160.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandic, D., & Goh, S. (2008). Complex valued nonlinear adaptive filters: A neural network approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mandic, D., Golz, M., Kuh, A., Obradovic, D., & Tanaka, T. (Eds.) (2007). Signal processing techniques for knowledge extraction and information fusion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mandic, D., Vayanos, P., Boukis, C., Jelfs, B., Goh, S., Gautama, T., et al. (2007). Collaborative adaptive learning using hybrid filters. In ICASSP 2007 (Vol. 3, pp. 921–924).

  14. Mandic, D., Vayanos, P., Javidi, S., Jelfs, B., & Aihara, K. (2008). Online tracking of the degree of nonlinearity within complex signals. In ICASSP 2008 (pp. 2061–2064).

  15. Martin, R., Sethares, W., Williamson, R., & Johnson, C., Jr. (2002). Exploiting sparsity in adaptive filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(8), 1883–1894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mizuta, H., Jibu, M., & Yana, K. (2000). Adaptive estimation of the degree of system nonlinearity. In Proceedings IEEE adaptive systems for signal processing and control symposium (AS-SPCC) (pp. 352–356).

  17. Narendra, K., & Parthasarathy, K. (1990). Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1(1), 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreiber, T. (1999). Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods. Physics Reports, 308(1), 1–64.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A. (1997). Discrimination power of measures for nonlinearity in a time series. Physical Review E, 55(5), 5443–5447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vayanos, P., Chen, M., Jelfs, B., & Mandic, D. (2007). Exploiting nonlinearity in adaptive signal processing. In Proceedings ISCA workshop on non linear speech processing. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vayanos, P., Goh, S., & Mandic, D. (2006). Online detection of the nature of complex-valued signals. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE signal processing society workshop on machine learning for signal processing (pp. 173–178).

  22. Widrow, B., McCool, J., & Ball, M. (1975). The complex LMS algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(4), 719–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Widrow, B., & Stearns, S. (1985). Adaptive signal processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Kazuyuki Aihara, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Japan for providing the wind data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Beth Jelfs, Soroush Javidi, Phebe Vayanos & Danilo Mandic

Authors
  1. Beth Jelfs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soroush Javidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Phebe Vayanos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Danilo Mandic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Jelfs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jelfs, B., Javidi, S., Vayanos, P. et al. Characterisation of Signal Modality: Exploiting Signal Nonlinearity in Machine Learning and Signal Processing. J Sign Process Syst 61, 105–115 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0358-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0358-z

Keywords