Skip to main content
Log in

3D Video Based Segmentation and Motion Estimation with Active Surface Evolution

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a novel method for three-dimensional (3D) segmentation and motion estimation based on 3D videos provided by TOF cameras is presented. The problem is formulated by a variational statement derived from the maximum a posterior probability (MAP) using 3D Optical Flow Constraint, containing both evolution surface and motion parameters. Therefore, the proposed method allows them to benefit from each other and perform motion segmentation and estimation simultaneously. All the formulation is under the assumption that environmental objects are rigid, and an iterative, PDE-driven level set method is adopted for energy minimization. Various experimental results show the validity of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouthemy, P., & François, E. (1993). Motion segmentation and qualitative dynamic scene analysis from an image sequence. International Journal of Computer Vision, 10(2), 157–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Potter, J. L. (1975). Velocity as a cue to segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 390–394.

  3. Dufaux, F., Moccagatta, I., Moscheni, F., & Nicolas, H. (1994). Vector quantization-based motion field segmentation under the entropy criterion. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 5, 356–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paragios, N., & Deriche, R. (2005). Geodesic active regions and level set methods for motion estimation and tracking. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 97(3), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schnörr, C. (1991). Determining optical flow for irregular domains by minimizing quadratic functionals of a certain class. International Journal of Computer Vision, 6(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mémin, E., & Pérez, P. (2002). Hierarchical estimation and segmentation of dense motion fields. International Journal of Computer Vision, 46(2), 129–155.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Yi, X., & Yu, H. Contour-based motion segmentation using few priors. ICSP2006, pp 1376-1379.

  8. Feghali, R., & Mitiche, A. (2004). Spatiotemporal motion boundary detection and motion boundary velocity estimation for tracking moving objects with a moving camera: a level sets PDEs approach with concurrent camera motion compensation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(11), 1473–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvarez, L., Castaño, C. A., Garcfa, M., Krissian, K., Mazorra, L., Salgado, A., & Sánchez, J. (2009). A new energy-based method for 3d motion estimation of incompressible PIV flows. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 113(7), 802–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Furukawa, Y., & Ponce, J. (2010). Dense 3D motion capture from synchronized video streams. Image and geometry processing for 3-D cinematography. Geometry and Computing, 5(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arun, K., Huang, T., & Blostein, S. (1987). Least-squares fitting of two 3D point sets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9, 698–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matei, B., & Meer, P. (1999). Optimal rigid motion estimation and performance evaluation with bootstrap. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Fort Collins, CO, volume 1, pp. 339–345.

  13. Heeger, D. J., & Jepson, A. D. (1992). Subspace methods for recovering rigid MotionI: algorithm and implementation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7, 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adiv, G. (1989). Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3D motion and structure from a noisy flow field. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Droeschel, D., et al. (2009). Robust ego-motion estimation with tof cameras. Proceeding of 4th European Conference on Mobile Robots, pp. 187–192, September.

  16. Villaverde, I., & Grana, M. (2009). An improved evolutionary approach for egomotion estimation with a 3D TOF camera. Proceedings of the 3rd International Work-Conference on The Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation: Part II: Bioinspired Applications in Artificial and Natural Computation, pp. 390–398.

  17. Ohno, K., Nomura, T., & Tadokoro, S. (2006). Real-Time Robot Trajectory Estimation and 3D Map Construction using 3D Camera. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Beijing, China, October.

  18. Miticha, A., Feghali, R., & Mansouri, A. (2003). Motion tracking as spatio-temporal motion bounfary detection. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 43(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Longuet-Higgins, H., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 385–397.

  20. Adiv, G. (1985). Determining three-dimensional motion and structure from optical flow general by several moving objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-7, No.4, July.

  21. Waxman, A. M. (1984). An image flow paradigm. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, Annapolis, pp. 49–57.

  22. Waxman, A. M., & Ullman, S. (1985). Surface structure and 3-D motion from image flow: a kinematic analysis. International Journal of Robotics Research.

  23. Horn, B., & Schunck, B. (1981). Determining optical flow (pp. 185–203). MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

  24. Chan, T. F., & Vese, L. A. (2001). Active contours without edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10, 266–277.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Caselles, V. (1995). Geometric models for Active Contours. In Proceeding of the 1995 International Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 3, pp. 3009.

  26. Leventon, M. E., et al. (2000). Statistical Shape Influence in Geodesic Active Contours. In 2000 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’00), Vol. 1, pp. 1316.

  27. Brox, T., et al. (2003). Unsupervised segmentation incorporating colour, texture, and motion. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2756, 353–360.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Mansouri, A. R., & Konrad, I. (2003). Multiple motion segmentation with level sets. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 12(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitiche, A., Sekkati, H. (2006). Optical flow 3D Segmentation and interpretation: a variational method with active curve evolution and level sets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(11), November.

  30. Osher, S., & Sethian, J. A. (1988). Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79, 12–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Whitaker, T. R. (1998). A level set approach to 3D reconstruction from range data. The International Journal of Computer Vision, 29(3), 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huimin Yu.

Additional information

This work was supported by NSFC under Grant No.60872069 and a National Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program No.2012CB316400).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Yu, H. & Hu, R. 3D Video Based Segmentation and Motion Estimation with Active Surface Evolution. J Sign Process Syst 71, 21–34 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-012-0675-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-012-0675-5

Keywords

Navigation