Skip to main content
Log in

An Affinity-Based Algorithm in Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform Domain: Application to Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Denoising

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An algorithm in which affinity is merged into nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) to denoise synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image is proposed. The important information (boundaries or details) or non-important information (homogeneous area) in a SAR image is estimated based on affinity matrix, by which the affinity-based denoising assigns a high affinity element to the coefficients of NSCT that belong to same region. The foreground and background in NSCT domain are automatically initialized which avoids the need for user initialization. Foreground probability obtained by optimizing objective function can be used to achieve the posterior ratio. Combining the posterior ratio and prior ratio, we can obtain the shrunk coefficients. The proposed algorithm was applied to real SAR images denoising and compared through the SAR image vision effect, the equivalent number of looks (ENL) and the edge sustain index (ESI). Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the compared algorithms and achieves the better denoising result and edge preservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rajwade, A., Rangarajan, A., & Banerjee, A. (2013). Image denoising using the higher order singular value decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(4), 849–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J. M. (2005). A non local algorithm for image denoising. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2, 60–65.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang, X. (2012). Iterative truncated arithmetic mean filter and its properties. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(4), 1537–1547.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Miao, Z., & Jiang, X. (2012). Further properties and a fast realization of the iterative truncated arithmetic mean filter. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II, 59(11), 810–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miao, Z., & Jiang, X. (2013). Weighted iterative truncated mean filter. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61(16), 4149–4160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Miao, Z., & Jiang, X. (2014). Additive and exclusive noise suppression by iterative trimmed and truncated mean algorithm. Signal Processing, 99, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J. S. (1980). Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-2, 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frost, V. S., Stiles, J. A., Shanmugan, K. S., et al. (1982). A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-4, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foucher, S., Bénié, G. B., & Boucher, J. M. (2001). Multiscale MAP filtering of SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(1), 49–60.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Achim, P. T., & Bezerianos, A. (2003). SAR image denoising via Bayesian wavelet shrinkage based on heavy-tailed modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(8), 1773–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molina, D. E., Gleich, D., & Datcu, M. (2010). Gibbs random field models for model-based despeckling of SAR images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7(1), 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Touzi, R. (2002). A review of speckle filtering in the context of estimation theory. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(11), 2392–2404.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Argenti, F., & Alparone, L. (2002). Speckle removal from SAR images in the undecimated wavelet domain. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(11), 2363–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dai, M., Peng, C., Chan, A. K., & Loguinov, D. (2004). Bayesian wavelet shrinkage with edge detection for SAR image especkling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(8), 1642–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sveinsson, J. R., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2003). Almost translation invariant wavelet transformations for speckle reduction of SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(10), 2404–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunha, L., Zhou, J., & Do, M. N. (2006). The nonsubsampled contourlet theory, design and application. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(10), 3089–3101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foucher, S., Farage G., and Benie, G. (2006). “SAR image filtering based on the stationary contourlet transform,” In: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4021–4024.

  18. Cunha, L., Zhou, J., and Do, M.N. (2005). “Nonsubsampled contourlet transform filter design and applications in denoising,”. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 749–752.

  19. Sveinsson, J.R., and Benediktsson, J.A. (2008). “Combined wavelet and contourlet denoising of SAR images,”. In: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1150–1153.

  20. Zhong, H., Feng, Y.T., and Jiao, L.C. (2009). “Road extraction in remote sensing images based on Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform,”. In: Asian-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, 880–883.

  21. Zhou, J., Cunha, A.L., and Do, M.N. (2005). “Nonsubsampled contourlet transform: construction and application in enhancement,”. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 469–472.

  22. He, K., Rhemann, C., Rother, C., Tang, X.O., and Sun, J. (2011). “A global sampling method for alpha matting,”. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2049–2056.

  23. Do, M. N., & Vetterli, M. (2003). “Contourlets”, in beyond wavelets. New York: Academic.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983). The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on Communication, 31(4), 532–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bamberger, R. H., & Smith, M. J. T. (1992). A filter bank for the directional decomposition of images: theory and design. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 40(4), 882–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun, Q., Jiao, L. C., & Hou, B. (2008). Synthetic aperture radar image denoising via spatially adaptive shrinkage in the nonsubsampled contourlet transform domain. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 17(1), 2392–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Donoho, D. L. (1995). Denoising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Informantion, 41(3), 613–627.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chuang, Y., Curless, B., Salesin, D.H., and Szeliski, R. (2001). “A Bayesian approach to digital matting,”. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 264–271.

  29. Eisemann, M., Wolf, J., and Magnor, M. (2009). “Spectral video matting,”. In: Proceeding of Vision, Modeling and Visualization, 121–126.

  30. Grady, L., Schiwietz, T., Aharon, S., and Westermann, R. (2005). “Random walks for interactive alpha-matting,”. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing, 423–429.

  31. Wang, G., Zhang, Y., and Li, F.F. (2006). “Using dependent regions for object categorization in a generative framework,”. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1597–1604.

  32. Lee, P., and Wu, Y. (2011). “Nonlocal Matting,”. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2193–2200.

  33. Rhemann, C., Rother, C., Rav-Acha, A., and Sharp, T. (2008). “High resolution matting via interactive trimap segmentation,”. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–8.

  34. Wang, J., and Cohen, M.F. (2007). “Optimized color sampling for robust matting,”.d In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–8.

  35. Zhang, W., & Liu, F. (2010). SAR image despeckling using edge detection and feature clustering in Bandelet domain. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letter, 7(1), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parrilli, S., Poderico, M., Angelino, C. V., & Verdoliva, L. (2012). A nonlocal SAR image denoising algorithm based on LLMMSE wavelet shrinkage. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(2), 606–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Project Supported by Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No.2014JM8301); The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB329402).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolin Tian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, X., Jiao, L. & Guo, K. An Affinity-Based Algorithm in Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform Domain: Application to Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Denoising. J Sign Process Syst 83, 373–388 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-015-1024-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-015-1024-2

Keywords

Navigation