Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization and Implementation of A Dynamic Neutron Imaging System at the PULSTAR Reactor

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A real time neutron imaging system is characterized and implemented to demonstrate the non-destructive examination of dynamic events such as bubble dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to estimate the bubble diameter and a phantom was manufactured accordingly to generate such bubbles. 1300 µm diameter bubbles are generated by injecting air through 50 µm diameter orifices. Spatial resolution, signal to noise ratio (SNR), and exposure time are measured with a 50 µm and 250 µm thick 6LiF:ZnS scintillator. The characterization was performed with multiple lens aperture opening (f/2.6, f/4.0, and f/5.6), charge-coupled device (CCD) binning (1 × 1, 2 × 2, and 4 × 4) and two different positions at the neutron beamline. The spatial resolution and exposure time were determined as 245 ± 5 µm and 50 ms respectively for the demonstration. Additionally, the individual bubbles were identified and segmented to characterize the size distribution of the bubbles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, I. S., McGreevy, R. L., & Bilheux, H. Z. (2009). Neutron imaging and applications. Springer Science Business Media, 200(2209), 987–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78693-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balasko, M., & Svab, E. (1996). Dynamic neutron radiography instrumentation and applications in Central Europe. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 377(1), 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(96)00130-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boillat, P., et al. (2017). Neutron imaging of fuel cells–Recent trends and future prospects. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 5(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2017.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bingham, P., et al. (2015). Neutron radiography of fluid flow for geothermal energy research. Physics Procedia, 69, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.07.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Terreni, J., et al. (2018). Observing Chemical Reactions by Time-Resolved High-Resolution Neutron Imaging. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 122(41), 23574–23581. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chad, L., & Zboray, R. (2020). Development of a high frame rate neutron imaging method for two-phase flows. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 954, 161707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peyghambarzadeh, S. M., et al. (2014). "Photographic study of bubble departure diameter in saturated pool boiling to electrolyte solutions," Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 20(1):143–153. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ120707120P

  8. Matkovic, M., Koncar, B. (2012). "Bubble departure diameter prediction uncertainty." Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/863190

  9. Hamzekhani, S., Falahieh, M. M., & Akbari, A. (2014). Bubble departure diameter in nucleate pool boiling at saturation: Pure liquids and binary mixtures. International Journal of Refrigeration, 46, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Datta, A. (2019). High Resolution Real-Time Neutron Imaging with Dynamic Capability at the PULSTAR Reactor. North Carolina State University. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.20/36599

  11. COMSOL Multiphysics v. 5.4. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden

  12. Hawari, A. I. (2021). “North Carolina State University PULSTAR Reactor”, Encyclopedia of Nuclear Energy, Elsevier. Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819725-7.00048-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Datta, A., & Hawari, A. I. (2020). Investigation of A Model Based Reconstruction Technique for Neutron Tomography at the PULSTAR Reactor. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 954, 161200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.09.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saxena, S., Liu, M., Hawari, A. I. (2015). Implementation of an FPGA-Based Digital Coincidence Doppler Broadening Spectrometer for PAS Measurements. Transactions of American Nuclear Society, 113(19):486 488 https://www.ans.org/pubs/transactions/article-37863/

  15. Datta, A., & Hawari, A. I. (2017). Geant4 Analysis of a Thermal Neutron Real-Time Imaging System. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 64(7), 1652–1658. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2017.2708031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Philip, R., Robinson, D. K. (2003). Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences, 3rd 1 edition, McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4823194

  17. Rebecca, V. O. Folorunso, O. (2009). "A descriptive algorithm for sobel image edge detection." In Proceedings of informing science & IT education conference (InSITE), 40, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.28945/3351

  18. Datta, A., Kurtz, A., Fallin, B. A., Hawari, A. I. (2019). “Investigation of FPGA Based Real Time Processing in Neutron Imaging.” IEEE Transactions on Nucluclear Science, 12(1), 554–556. https://www.ans.org/pubs/transactions/article-47621/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) infrastructure grant. Arka Datta was with the Department of Nuclear Engineering at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, North Carolina, when this work was performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arka Datta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Datta, A., Hawari, A.I. Characterization and Implementation of A Dynamic Neutron Imaging System at the PULSTAR Reactor. J Sign Process Syst 94, 411–424 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-021-01694-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-021-01694-8

Keywords

Navigation