Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity of data collection in randomly-deployed wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data collection is one of the most important functions provided by wireless sensor networks. In this paper, we study theoretical limitations of data collection and data aggregation in terms of delay and capacity for a wireless sensor network where n sensors are randomly deployed. We consider different communication scenarios such as with single sink or multiple sinks, regularly-deployed or randomly-deployed sinks, with or without aggregation. For each scenario, we not only propose a data collection/aggregation method and analyze its performance in terms of delay and capacity, but also theoretically prove whether our method can achieve the optimal order (i.e., its performance is within a constant factor of the optimal). Particularly, with a single sink, the capacity of data collection is in order of \(\Uptheta(W)\) where W is the fixed data-rate on individual links. With k regularly deployed sinks, the capacity of data collection is increased to \(\Uptheta(kW)\) when \(k=O\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}\right)\) or \(\Uptheta\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}W\right)\) when \(k=\Upomega\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}\right)\). With k randomly deployed sinks, the capacity of data collection is between \(\Uptheta\left({\frac{k}{\log k}}W\right)\) and \(\Uptheta(kW)\) when \(k=O\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}\right)\) or \(\Uptheta\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}W\right)\) when \(k=\omega\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}\right)\). If each sensor can aggregate its receiving packets into a single packet to send, the capacity of data collection with a single sink is also increased to \(\Uptheta\left({\frac{n}{\log n}}W\right)\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We can also think of this as the case where each cell has a single sensor. Then the rate of receiving data at the sink is a constant dependent on R.

References

  1. Duarte-Melo E. J., & Liu, M. (2003). Data-gathering wireless sensor networks: Organization and capacity. Computer Networks, 43, 519–537.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, M., Neuhoff, D. L., Marco, D., & Duarte-Melo, E. J. (2003). On the many-to-one transport capacity of a dense wireless sensor network and the compressibility of its data. In Proceedings of international workshop on information processing in sensor networks.

  3. El Gamal, H. (2005). On the scaling laws of dense wireless sensor networks: The data gathering channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(3), 1229–1234.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, R., & Barton, R. J. (2007). Toward optimal data aggregation in random wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer communications (Infocom).

  5. Barton, R. J., & Zheng, R. (2006). Order-optimal data aggregation in wireless sensor networks using cooperative time-reversal communication. In Proceedings of 40th annual conference on information sciences and systems.

  6. Liu, B., Towsley, D., & Swami, A. (2008). Data gathering capacity of large scale multihop wireless networks. In Proceedings of 5th IEEE international conference on mobile ad-hoc and sensor systems (MASS).

  7. Giridhar, A., & Kumar, P. R. (2005). Computing and communicating functions over sensor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(4), 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moscibroda, T. (2007). The worst-case capacity of wireless sensor networks. In IPSN ’07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks.

  9. Kulkarni S. R., & Viswanath, P. (2004). A deterministic approach to throughput scaling in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(6), 1041–1049.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao, S. (2003). The m balls and n bins problem. Lecture Note for Lecture 11, CS270 Combinatiorial Algorithms and Data Structures, University of Berkeley.

  11. Raab, M., & Steger, A. (1998). Balls into bins—a simple and tight analysis. In RANDOM ’98: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on randomization and approximation techniques in computer science (pp. 159–170).

  12. Gupta, P., & Kumar, P. R. (2000). The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(2), 388–404.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossglauser, M., & Tse, D. (2001). Mobility increases the capacity of ad-hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer communications (Infocom).

  14. Liu, B., Thiran, P., & Towsley, D. (2007). Capacity of a wireless ad hoc network with infrastructure. In Proceedings of ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc).

  15. Agarwal, A., Kumar, P. R. (2004). Capacity bounds for ad hoc and hybrid wireless networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 34(3), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, X.-Y., Tang, S.-J., & Frieder, O. (2007). Multicast capacity for large scale wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom).

  17. Mao, X., Li, X.-Y., & Tang, S. (2008). Multicast capacity for hybrid wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc).

  18. Shakkottai, S., Liu, X., & Srikant, R. (2007). The multicast capacity of large multihop wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc).

  19. Keshavarz-Haddad, A., Ribeiro, V., & Riedi, R. (2006). Broadcast capacity in multihop wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom).

  20. Tavli, B. (2006). Broadcast capacity of wireless networks. Communications Letters, IEEE, 10, 68–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gandhi, R., Parthasarathy, S., & Mishra, A. (2003). Minimizing broadcast latency and redundancy in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc).

  22. Wu, Y.-W., Zhao, J., Li, X.-Y., Tang, S.-J., Xu, X.-H., & Mao, X.-F. (2008). Broadcast capacity for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of 5th IEEE international conference on mobile ad-hoc and sensor systems (MASS).

  23. Hu, C., Wang, X., & Wu, F. (2009). MotionCast: On the capacity and delay tradeoffs. In Proceedings of ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc).

  24. Zhu, X., Tang, B., & Gupta, H. (2005). Delay efficient data grathering in sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE 1st international conference on mobile ad-hoc and sensor networks (MSN).

  25. Chen, X., Hu, X., & Zhu, J. (2005). Minimum data aggregation time problem in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE 1st international conference on mobile ad-hoc and sensor networks (MSN).

  26. Huang, S. C.-H., Wan, P.-J., Vu, C. T., Li, Y., & Yao, F. (2007). Nearly constant approximation for data aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer communications (Infocom).

  27. Zhu, J., & Hu, X. (2008). Improved algorithm for minimum data aggregation time problem in wireless sensor networks. Journal of System Science and Complexity, 21, 626–636.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, S., Wang, Y., Li, X.-Y., & Shi, X. (2009). Data collection capacity of random-deployed wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE global telecommunications conference (Globecom).

  29. Li, X.-Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2010). Complexity of data collection, aggregation, and selection for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transctions on Computer (to appear).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work of S. Chen and Y. Wang is supported in part by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CNS-0721666, CNS-0915331, and CNS-1050398. The work of X.-Y. Li is partially supported by the US NSF under Grant No. CNS-0832120, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 60828003, No.60773042 and No.60803126, the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grant No. Z1080979, the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant No. 2006CB30300, the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) under Grant No. 2007AA01Z180, the Hong Kong RGC under Grant HKUST 6169/07, HKBU 2104/06E, and CERG under Grant PolyU- 5232/07E. X.-Y. Li is also with Institute of Computer Application Technology, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, S., Wang, Y., Li, XY. et al. Capacity of data collection in randomly-deployed wireless sensor networks. Wireless Netw 17, 305–318 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-010-0281-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-010-0281-z

Keywords

Navigation