Skip to main content
Log in

An adaptive handoff strategy for cognitive radio networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spectrum handoff plays an important role in spectrum management as it is the process of seamlessly shifting the on-going transmission of a secondary user (SU) to a free channel without degrading the quality of service. In this paper, we develop an adaptive handoff algorithm that allows an SU to detect the arrival of a primary user (via sensing) and adapt to a reactive or a proactive handoff strategy accordingly. The adaptive handoff scheme first allows an SU to decide whether to stay and wait on current channel or to perform handoff. Then, in case of handoff, an SU intelligently shifts between proactive or reactive handoff modes based on primary use (PU) arrival rate. Further, a PU prioritized Markov approach is presented in order to model the interactions between PUs and SUs for smooth channel access. Numerical results show that the proposed handoff scheme minimizes the blocking probability, number of handoffs, handoff delay and data delivery time while maintaining channel utilization and system throughput at maximal level compared to simple reactive and proactive schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The difference between a hybrid and an adaptive handoff solution is clarified in the Related Work Section.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., et al. (2009). Spectrum management in cognitive radio Ad hoc networks. IEEE Network, 23, 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2010). Widely linear cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 1–5).

  3. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2010). CAODV: Routing in mobile Ad hoc cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IFIP wireless days (pp. 1–5).

  4. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2012). Correlation-aware user selection for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio Ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2012). Reactive routing for mobile cognitive radio Ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10, 803–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2013). Decision Maker approaches for cooperative spectrum sensing: Participate or not participate in sensing? IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12, 2445–2457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2015). Channel availability for mobile cognitive radio networks. Elsevier Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 47, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cacciapuoti, A. S., et al. (2016). On the impact of primary traffic correlation in TV white space. Ad Hoc Networks, 37, 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatterjee, S., et al. (2015). On optimal threshold selection in cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks: An energy detection approach using fuzzy entropy maximization. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 84, 1605–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christian, I., et al. (2012). Spectrum mobility in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Communication Magazine, Topics in Radio Communication, 50, 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chunyan, A. N., et al. (2010). Dynamic spectrum access with QoS provisioning in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 1–5).

  12. Clancy, T. C., et al. (2007). Achievable capacity under the interference temperature model. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM (pp. 794–802).

  13. Fahimi, M., et al. (2016). Joint spectrum load balancing and handoff management in cognitive radio networks: A non-cooperative game approach. Springer Wireless Networks, 22, 1161–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. FCC, ET Docket No 03-322 Notice of proposed rule making and order, Dec 2003.

  15. Hu, W., et al. (2007). Cognitive radios for dynamic spectrum access—dynamic frequency hopping communities for efficient IEEE 802.22 operation. IEEE Communications Magazine, 45, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, X., et al. (2015). On green-energy-powered cognitive radio networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17, 827–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahraman, B., et al. (2015). An efficient and adaptive channel handover procedure for cognitive radio networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 15, 442–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, K., et al. (2016). Spectrum handoff in cognitive radio networks: A classification and comprehensive survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 61, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lala, N. A., et al. (2013). Novel hybrid spectrum handoff for cognitive radio networks. International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies (IJWMT), 3, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lertsinsrubtavee, A., et al. (2016). Hybrid spectrum sharing through adaptive spectrum handoff and selection. In IEEE transactions on mobile computing (Vol. PP, pp. 1–13).

  21. Min, A. W., et al. (2011). Opportunistic spectrum access for mobile cognitive radios. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM (pp. 2993–3001).

  22. Mir, U., et al. (2014). A multiagent based scheme for unlicensed spectrum access in CR networks. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 79(3), 1765–1768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandya, S., et al. (2015). Energy detection based spectrum sensing for cognitive radio network. In Proceedings of the IEEE 15th international conference on communication systems and network technologies (CSNT) (pp. 201–206).

  24. Pham, C., et al. (2014). Spectrum handoff model based on hidden Markov model in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on information networking 2014 (ICOIN2014) (pp. 406–411).

  25. Shokri, H., et al. (2013). Energy efficient spectrum sensing and handoff strategies in cognitive radio networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.0045.

  26. Shokri, S., et al. (2015). Green sensing and access: Energy-throughput trade-offs in cognitive networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53, 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song, Y., et al. (2010). Common hopping based proactive spectrum handoff in cognitive radio Ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 1–5).

  28. Tayel, A. F., et al. (2016). An optimized hybrid approach for spectrum handoff in cognitive radio networks with non-identical channels. In IEEE transactions on communications (Vol. PP, pp. 1–10).

  29. Tian, et al. (2014). Second users operation strategies based on primary users activities. Scientific Journal of Information Engineering, 4, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tran, M. P., et al. (2015). Effective spectrum handoff for cognitive UWB industrial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 20th conference on emerging technologies & factory automation (ETFA) (pp. 1–4).

  31. Usman, M., et al. (2015). Energy-efficient channel handoff for sensor network-assisted cognitive radio network. Sensors, 15, 18012–18039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, C. W., et al. (2010). Modelling and analysis for proactive decision spectrum handoff in cognitive radio networks. In IEEE global telecommunications conference (pp. 13–18).

  33. Wang, B., et al. (2009). Primary-prioritized Markov approach for dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8, 1854–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, C. W., et al. (2012). Analysis of reactive spectrum handoff in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 30, 2016–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Willkomm, D., et al. (2005). Reliable link maintenance in cognitive radio systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 371–378).

  36. Wu, Y., et al. (2016). Optimal spectrum handoff control for CRN based on hybrid priority queuing and multi-teacher apprentice learning. In IEEE transactions on vehicular technology (Vol. PP, pp. 1–12).

  37. Wu, Y., et al. (2016). Delay-constrained optimal transmission with proactive spectrum handoff in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64, 2767–2779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xing, X., et al. (2013). Spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20, 90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yin, C., et al. (2013). A hybrid handoff strategy based on dynamic spectrum aggregation in cognitive radio system. In IEEE TENCON spring conference (pp. 213–217).

  40. Yucek, T., et al. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials, 11, 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu, X., et al. (2007). Analysis of cognitive radio spectrum access with optimal channel reservation. IEEE Communications Letters, 11, 304–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usama Mir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mir, U., Munir, A. An adaptive handoff strategy for cognitive radio networks. Wireless Netw 24, 2077–2092 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1455-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1455-8

Keywords

Navigation