Skip to main content
Log in

Wireless fingerprinting indoor positioning using affinity propagation clustering methods

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to rapid extension of wireless sensor network localization, indoor localization using fingerprint has turned out to be more considerable lately. It contains of a database called Receive Strength Signal Indicator vectors, which is a primitive amount in wireless sensor network fingerprinting positioning. The equivalence of a few strategies is brought up from the literary works, and some new variants are presented in this study. A combination of a clustering strategy named affinity propagation and statistical and probabilistic positioning procedures is considered in this review and at the same time, the impact of some components in our methodology onto positioning precision will be investigated. Affinity propagation clustering method set up a common baseline for assessing the relative accuracy of various indoor location methods effectively. Eventually two coarse localization methods as Mahalanobis norm method and similarity to exemplar receive strength signal vector are compared based on positioning accuracy and performance. Experimental outcomes prove that the intended algorithm will advance the accuracy and localization error compared with the method without clustering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dawes, B., & Chin, K. W. (2011). A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic methods for indoor localization. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(3), 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lymberopoulos, D., Liu, J., Yang, X., Choudhury, R. R., Handziski, V., & Sen, S. (2015). A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies: Experiences and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information processing in sensor networks (pp. 178–189). ACM.

  3. Zekavat, R., & Buehrer, R. M. (2011). Handbook of position location: Theory, practice and advances (Vol. 27, pp. 359–522). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Moghtadaiee, V., & Dempster, A. G. (2012). WiFi fingerprinting signal strength error modeling for short distances. In 2012 International conference on indoor positioning and indoor navigation (IPIN) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  5. Feng, C., Au, W. S. A., Valaee, S., & Tan, Z. (2012). Received-signal-strength-based indoor positioning using compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(12), 1983–1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, V. K., Tapaswi, S., & Shukla, A. (2013). Performance analysis of received signal strength fingerprinting based distributed location estimation system for indoor wlan. Wireless Personal Communications, 70(1), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bahl, P., Padmanabhan, V. N., & Balachandran, A. (2000). Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking system. Technical report, Microsoft Research.

  8. Khodayari, S., Maleki, M., & Hamedi, E. (2010). A RSS-based fingerprinting method for positioning based on historical data. In 2010 International symposium on performance evaluation of computer and telecommunication systems (SPECTS) (pp. 306–310). IEEE.

  9. Kushki, A., Plataniotis, K. N., & Venetsanopoulos, A. N. (2007). Kernel-based positioning in wireless local area networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(6), 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nazir, U., Arshad, M. A., Shahid, N., et al. (2012). Classification of localization algorithms for wireless sensor network: A survey. In 2012 international conference on open source systems and technologies (ICOSST) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  11. Tian, Z., Tang, X., Zhou, M., & Tan, Z. (2014). Probability distribution-aided indoor positioning algorithm based on affinity propagation clustering. In The Proceedings of the second international conference on communications, signal processing, and systems (pp. 911–919). Springer International Publishing.

  12. Boukerche, A., Oliveira, H. A., Nakamura, E. F., & Loureiro, A. A. (2007). Localization systems for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(6), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bachrach, J., & Taylor, C. (2005). Localization in sensor networks. Handbook of sensor networks: Algorithms and architectures, 1, 277–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Honkavirta, V., Perala, T., Ali-Loytty, S., & Piche, R. (2009). A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods. In 6th Workshop on positioning, navigation and communication, 2009 (WPNC 2009) (pp. 243–251). IEEE.

  15. Zhou, M., Wong, A. K. S., Tian, Z., Zhang, V. Y., et al. (2013). Adaptive mobility mapping for people tracking using unlabelled Wi-Fi shotgun reads. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(1), 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, C. W., Lin, T. N., Fang, S. H., & Chou, Y. C. (2013, September). A novel clustering-based approach of indoor location fingerprinting. In 2013 IEEE 24th international symposium on personal indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 3191–3196). IEEE.

  17. Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007). Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315(5814), 972–976.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. De Maesschalck, R., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., & Massart, D. L. (2000). The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 50, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karegar, P. A. (2015). A new approach in wireless sensor network fingerprinting localization by affinity propagation and K-nearest neighbor method. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, 4(5), 335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilbe, J. M., Robinson, A. P. (2013). Methods of statistical model estimation. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pejman Abdollahzadeh Karegar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karegar, P.A. Wireless fingerprinting indoor positioning using affinity propagation clustering methods. Wireless Netw 24, 2825–2833 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1507-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1507-0

Keywords

Navigation