Skip to main content
Log in

The recognition of multi-components signals based on semantic segmentation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The separation and recognition of radar signals are crucial in a complex electromagnetic environment, especially multi-component radar signals. However, most existing algorithms can only recognize dual-component signals. An algorithm based on semantic segmentation is proposed to separate the signal in the time-frequency domain and classify multi-component radar signals. An improved Cohen class time-frequency distribution (CTFD) is used to represent the one-dimensional signals as time-frequency images (TFIs). A convolutional denoising autoencoder (CDAE) is established to filter the TFIs. Three semantic segmentation networks are used, a fully convolutional neural network (FCN-8s), U-Net, and DeepLab V3+. The method can separate and recognize signals simultaneously and is applied to aliased signals composed of 1-4 components. The simulation results show that the proposed method provides excellent performance for separating and recognizing multi-component signals. At a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 0 dB, the accuracies of the aliased radar signals with 1-4 components are 100%, 100%, 96.67%, and 93.75%, respectively. The separation and recognition algorithm can be adapted to other signal modulation types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang, C., Feng, L., Zhang, H., He, S., & Shi, Z. (2018). A novel data fusion algorithm to combat false data injection attacks in networked radar systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 4(1), 125–136.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding, G., Wu, Q., Zhang, L., Lin, Y., Tsiftsis, T. A., & Yao, Y.-D. (2018). An amateur drone surveillance system based on the cognitive internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, G., & Kuang, G. (2015). Classification on the monogenic scale space: application to target recognition in SAR image. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 24(8), 2527–2539.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, J., & Lv, Y. (2018). Likelihood-based automatic modulation classification in OFDM with index modulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(9), 8192–8204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, Y., Tu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2020). An improved neural network pruning technology for automatic modulation classification in edge devices. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(5), 5703–5706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., Yang, J., Liu, M., & Gui, G. (2020). Lightamc: Lightweight automatic modulation classification via deep learning and compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(3), 3491–3495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng, S., Jiang, H., Wang, H., Alwageed, H., Zhou, Y., Sebdani, M. M., & Yao, Y.-D. (2018). Modulation classification based on signal constellation diagrams and deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 30(3), 718–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, Y., Tu, Y., Dou, Z., Chen, L., & Mao, S. (2020). Contour stella image and deep learning for signal recognition in the physical layer. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 7(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tu, Y., Lin, Y., Hou, C., & Mao, S. (2020). Complex-valued networks for automatic modulation classification. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(9), 10085–10089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, Y., Zhu, X., Zheng, Z., Dou, Z., & Zhou, R. (2019). The individual identification method of wireless device based on dimensionality reduction and machine learning. The Journal of Supercomputing, 75(6), 3010–3027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu, Y., Lin, Y., Wang, J., & Kim, J.-U. (2018). Semi-supervised learning with generative adversarial networks on digital signal modulation classification. Computers Materials Continua, 55(2), 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C., & Morency, L.-P. (2018). Multimodal machine learning: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41(2), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Gan, C., Sun, S., & Wang, M. (2019). Automatic modulation classification using convolutional neural network with features fusion of SPWVD and BJD. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 5(3), 469–478.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ni, X., Wang, H., Meng, F., Hu, J., & Tong, C. (2021). LPI radar waveform recognition based on multi-resolution deep feature fusion. IEEE Access, 9, 26138–26146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, J., Shen, L., & Gao, L. (2019). Modulation recognition for radar emitter signals based on convolutional neural network and fusion features. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 30(12), e3612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hou, C., Liu, G., Tian, Q., Zhou, Z., Hua, L., & Lin, Y. (2022). Multi-signal modulation classification using sliding window detection and complex convolutional network in frequency domain. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3167107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Z., Li, L., Xu, H., & Li, H.: A method for recognition and classification for hybrid signals based on deep convolutional neural network. In: 2018 international conference on electronics technology (ICET), pp. 325–330 (2018). IEEE

  18. Qu, Z., Hou, C., Hou, C., & Wang, W. (2020). Radar signal intra-pulse modulation recognition based on convolutional neural network and deep q-learning network. IEEE Access, 8, 49125–49136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng, Y., Shao, J., Zhao, Y., Liu, S., & Malekian, R. (2019). An improved separation method of multi-components signal for sensing based on time-frequency representation. Review of Scientific Instruments, 90(6), 064901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, S., Dong, X., Xing, G., Peng, Z., Zhang, W., & Meng, G. (2017). Separation of overlapped non-stationary signals by ridge path regrouping and intrinsic chirp component decomposition. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(18), 5994–6005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng, Z., Liang, M., & Chu, F. (2013). Recent advances in time-frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: a review with application examples. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 38(1), 165–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, J., & Zhou, X. (2020). One-dimensional residual convolutional autoencoder based feature learning for gearbox fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(10), 6347–6358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundén, J., & Koivunen, V. (2007). Automatic radar waveform recognition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 1(1), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qu, Z., Mao, X., & Deng, Z. (2018). Radar signal intra-pulse modulation recognition based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Access, 6, 43874–43884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Y., Xiao, J., Peng, J., Ding, Y., Liu, J., Guo, Z., & Zong, X. (2018). Kernel wiener filtering model with low-rank approximation for image denoising. Information Sciences, 462, 402–416.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, Q., Li, Y., & Lin, Y. (2017). The application of nonlocal total variation in image denoising for mobile transmission. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(16), 17179–17191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, W., Liu, X., Wang, S., Fan, X., & Zhao, D. (2019). Graph-based feature-preserving mesh normal filtering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2944357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3431–3440 (2015)

  29. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, & P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 234–241 (2015). Springer

  30. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H.: Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp. 801–818 (2018)

  31. Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

  32. Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H.: Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587 (2017)

  33. Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollár, P.: Focal loss for dense object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 2980–2988 (2017)

  34. Pan, Z., Wang, S., Zhu, M., & Li, Y. (2020). Automatic waveform recognition of overlapping LPI radar signals based on multi-instance multi-label learning. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 27, 1275–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Si, W., Wan, C., & Zhang, C. (2021). Towards an accurate radar waveform recognition algorithm based on dense CNN. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(2), 1779–1792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin, Y., Zhao, H., Ma, X., Tu, Y., & Wang, M. (2020). Adversarial attacks in modulation recognition with convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 70(1), 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun, J., Wang, W., Kou, L., Lin, Y., Zhang, L., Da, Q., & Chen, L. (2020). A data authentication scheme for UAV ad hoc network communication. The Journal of Supercomputing, 76(6), 4041–4056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, M., Lin, Y., Tian, Q., & Si, G. (2021). Transfer learning promotes 6g wireless communications: recent advances and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2021.3062045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Lin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, C., Fu, D., Hua, L. et al. The recognition of multi-components signals based on semantic segmentation. Wireless Netw 29, 147–160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03086-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03086-7

Keywords

Navigation