Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed control for semi-grant-free non-orthogonal multiple access

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the huge number of devices with the differentiated requirement for latency and reliability, the uplink transmission of the Internet of Things (IoT) has the problem of excessive control signaling. In this regard, this paper proposes a distributed control strategy for Semi-Grant-Free (SGF) Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA). By exploiting the distributed control strategy, the SGF protocol can provide services for multiple grant-free (GF) devices while ensuring reliable communications for grant-based (GB) devices with a few control signaling. Compared with the existing SGF protocol, this protocol can flexibly control the access number of GF devices and improve the communication quality of GF devices. To analyze the performance of the proposed SGF protocol, we propose the concept of service outage probability (SOP). Further, an exact expression of the SOP is obtained and an approximate solution is derived for more tractable results. Simulation results validate the theoretical results and demonstrate the advantage of the proposed SGF protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availibility

All data generated or used during the study appear in the submitted paper.

Notes

  1. The main focus in this article is on how to solve the conflicts when GF devices choose resources and ensure the communication quality of GB devices simultaneously. Whether GF devices have the same target rate mainly affects the optimal SIC demodulation order and resource block partitioning in the power domain. Therefore, studying scenarios where GF devices have different target rates does not contribute further insight into this article and is beyond the scope of this article, but will be an important direction of our future research.

References

  1. Kar, S., Mishra, P., & Wang, K. C. (2021). “5G-IoT Architecture for Next Generation Smart Systems,” 2021 IEEE 4th 5G World Forum (5GWF), pp. 241–246

  2. Yarali, A. (2022) “AI, 5G, and IoT,” Intelligent Connectivity: AI, IoT, and 5G, IEEE, pp. 117–131, 2022.

  3. Chettri, L., & Bera, R. (2020). A comprehensive survey on internet of things (IoT) toward 5G wireless systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(1), 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saha, S., Sukumaran, V. B., & Murthy, C. R. (2021). On the minimum average age of information in IRSA for grant-free mMTC. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 39(5), 1441–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, L., Larsson, E. G., Yu, W., et al. (2018). Sparse signal processing for grant-free massive connectivity: A future paradigm for random access protocols in the internet of things. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(5), 88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shahab, M. B., Abbas, R., Shirvanimoghaddam, M., et al. (2020). Grant-free non-orthogonal multiple access for IoT: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 22(3), 1805–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Jiang, Q. Cui, Y. Gu, X. Qin, X. Zhang, and X. Tao, (2018) Distributed Layered Grant-Free Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for Massive MTC,” 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1–7.

  8. Wu, L., Tang, X., Zhang, Z., & Dang, J. (2021). Enhanced power choice barring scheme for massive MTCs with grant-free NOMA. China Communications, 18(10), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, Z., Fan, P., & Poor, H. V. (2016). Impact of user pairing on 5G nonorthogonal multiple-access downlink transmissions. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(8), 6010–6023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lv, L., Chen, J., & Ni, Q. (2016). Cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access in cognitive radio. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(10), 2059–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pliatsios, D., Boulogeorgos, A. -A. A., Lagkas, T., Argyriou, V., Moscholios, I. D., & Sarigiannidis, P. (2021). “Semi-Grant-Free Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for Tactile Internet of Things,” 2021 IEEE 32nd Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp.1389–1394.

  12. Ding, Z., Schober, R., Fan, P., & Poor, H. V. (2019). Simple semi-grant-free transmission strategies assisted by non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 67(6), 4464–4478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, C., Liu, Y., & Ding, Z. (2022). Semi-Grant-Free NOMA: A stochastic geometry model. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 21(2), 1197–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding, Z., Schober, R., & Poor, H. V. (2021). A new QoS-guarantee strategy for NOMA assisted semi-grant-free transmission. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 69(11), 7489–7503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabassum, H., Hossain, E., & Hossain, M. J. (2017). Modeling and analysis of uplink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in large-scale cellular networks using Poisson cluster processes. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 65(8), 3555–3570.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, Q., & Tong, L. (2005). Opportunistic carrier sensing for energy-efficient information retrieval in sensor networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2, 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bletsas, A., Khisti, A., Reed, D. P., & Lippman, A. (2006). A simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(3), 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Talak, R., & Mehta, N. B. (2012). Feedback overhead-aware, distributed, fast, and reliable selection. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(11), 3417–3428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. David, H. A., & Nagaraja, H. N. (2003). Order Statistic (3rd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61971320, 62201421, 61901312), in part by the Key Industrial Innovation Chain Project in Industrial Domain under Grant 2023-ZDLGY-50, in part by the; Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (No. 2021JQ-206, 2023-JC-QN-0717), in part by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation under Grant 2020A1515110084, and in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. under Grant ZYTS23176.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baoyi Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, M., Xu, B., Chen, J. et al. Distributed control for semi-grant-free non-orthogonal multiple access. Wireless Netw 30, 309–320 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03462-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03462-x

Keywords

Navigation