Abstract
Simultaneous wireless information and power transmission (SWIPT) allows the use of RF signals for both information detection and energy harvesting. Integration of cooperation, NOMA and SWIPT can provide energy-efficient, reliable, and spectral-efficient networks. Therefore, this study aims to design energy harvesting-enabled cooperative NOMA (C-NOMA) networks. This work investigates relay selection for multiple relay downlink C-NOMA networks with SWIPT in the presence of interference. The analytical closed-form outage probability expressions for the proposed relay selection are derived. Subsequently, the impact of various parameters, including the number of available relay nodes, energy harvesting parameters, and energy conversion efficiency, is analyzed on the performance of proposed networks. The finding showed that system performance improves with the number of intermediate relaying nodes, transmit power, and energy conversion efficiency. Comparative analysis of NOMA and time division multiple access TDMA proved the superiority of NOMA over traditional OMA schemes.






Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The data sources used in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
Ding, Z., et al. (2017). Application of non-orthogonal multiple access in LTE and 5G networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(2), 185–191.
Liaqat, M., et al. (2020). Power-domain non orthogonal multiple access (PD-NOMA) in cooperative networks: An overview. Wireless Networks, 26(1), 181–203.
Men, J., & Ge, J. (2015). Non-orthogonal multiple access for multiple-antenna relaying networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(10), 1686–1689.
Lin, F., Huang, H., Luo, T & Yue, G. (2007). Impact of relay location to SER performance with different power allocation methods in cooperative system. In International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems, 2007. ICCCAS 2007. 2007. IEEE.
Liu, Y., Pan, G., Zhang, H., & Song, M. (2016). Hybrid decode-forward & amplify-forward relaying with non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Access, 4, 4912–4921.
Zhang, D., Liu, Y., Ding, Z., Zhou, Z., Nallanathan, A., & Sato, T. (2017). Performance analysis of non-regenerative massive-MIMO-NOMA relay systems for 5G. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 65, 4777–4790.
Men, J., Ge, J., & Zhang, C. (2017). Performance analysis of nonorthogonal multiple access for relaying networks over Nakagami-mFading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(2), 1200–1208.
Yue, X., Liu, Y., Kang, S., & Nallanathan, A. (2017). Performance analysis of NOMA with fixed gain relaying over Nakagami-m fading channels. IEEE Access, 5, 1–1.
Kim, J.-B., & Lee, I.-H. (2015). Non-orthogonal multiple access in coordinated direct and relay transmission. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(11), 2037–2040.
Liang, X., Wu, Y., Ng, D. W. K., Zuo, Y., Jin, S., & Zhu, H. (2017). Outage performance for cooperative NOMA transmission with an AF relay. IEEE Communications Letters, 21, 1–1.
Alkhawatrah, M. (2022). The performance of supervised machine learning based relay selection in cooperative NOMA. IEEE Access, 11, 1570–1577.
Diamanti, M., Tsiropoulou, E.E., & Papavassiliou, S. (2021). The joint power of NOMA and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in SWIPT networks. In 2021 IEEE 22nd international workshop on signal processing advances in wireless communications (SPAWC). IEEE.
Ren, Y., Ren, B., Zhang, X., Lv, T., Ni, W., & Lu, G. (2023). Impartial cooperation in SWIPT-assisted NOMA systems with random user distribution. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 72, 10488–10504.
Goktas, M.B., Dursun, Y. & Ding, Z. (2023). IRS and SWIPT-assisted full-duplex NOMA for 6G umMTC. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking.
Zhao, N., Zhang, S., Richard Yu, F., Chen, Y., Nallanathan, A. & Leung, V.C.M. (2017). Exploiting interference for energy harvesting: A survey, research issues, and challenges. IEEE Access, 5, 10403–10421.
Gu, Y., & Aissa, S. (2015). RF-based energy harvesting in decode-and-forward relaying systems: Ergodic and outage capacities. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(11), 6425–6434.
Elmorshedy, L., Leung, C. & Mousavifar. S.A. (2016). RF energy harvesting in DF relay networks in the presence of an interfering signal. In 2016 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (2016, pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Do, D.-T., & Nguyen, H.-S. (2016). A tractable approach to analyzing the energy-aware two-way relaying networks in the presence of co-channel interference. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2016(1), 271.
Shaik, R. H., & Naidu, R. (2019). Performance evaluation of energy harvesting based DF system over Nakagami-m fading channels in the presence of co-channel interferences. Physical Communication, 36, 100758.
Nguyen, T.-L. & Do, D.-T. (2018). Exploiting impacts of intercell interference on SWIPT-assisted non-orthogonal multiple access. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, 1–12.
Rauniyar, A., Engelstad, P. E., & Østerbø, O. N. (2019). Performance analysis of RF energy harvesting and information transmission based on NOMA with interfering signal for IoT relay systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(17), 7668–7682.
Yang, Z., et al. (2017). The impact of power allocation on cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access networks with SWIPT. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(7), 4332–4343.
Krikidis, I. (2015). Relay selection in wireless powered cooperative networks with energy storage. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(12), 2596–2610.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Where \(X={\left|{g}_{n}\right|}^{2},{X}_{1}={\left|{h}_{n1}\right|}^{2}, {X}_{I}=\sum_{i=1}^{L}{\left|{g}_{i}\right|}^{2}, C=\left(1-\xi \right){\rho }_{I} and {\rho }_{I}=\frac{{P}_{I}}{{N}_{0}}.\)
As \({X}_{1},{X}_{2} and {X}_{I}\) are independent of each other, first and last term cancels out.
Using binomial expansion to further solve the P1
\({\int }_{0}^{\infty }{e}^{-\frac{\beta }{4x}-\lambda x}=\sqrt{\beta /\lambda } {K}_{1}\sqrt{\beta \lambda }\) is used to solve above equation further,
From (3.381.4) of (Gradshteyn & Ryzhik, 2014), \(\underset{0}{\overset{\infty }{\int }}{x}^{v-1}{e}^{-\mu x}dx=\frac{1}{{\mu }^{v}}\Gamma (v)\)
Which completes the proof.
Appendix B
Let,
where \(X = \left| {g_{n} } \right|^{2} ,X_{2} = \left| {h_{n2} } \right|^{2} ,C_{3} = \left( {1 - \xi } \right)\rho_{I} and\, X_{I} = \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{L} \left| {g_{i} } \right|^{2}.\)
Following \(\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } x^{v - 1} e^{ - \mu x} dx = \frac{1}{{\mu^{v} }}\Gamma \left( v \right)\)
Let \(P_{2}^{2} = Q_{1} - Q_{2}\)
\(\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } e^{{ - \frac{\beta }{4x} - \lambda x}} = \sqrt {\beta /\lambda } K_{1} \sqrt {\beta \lambda }\) is used to solve above equation further,
From (3.381.4) of (Gradshteyn & Ryzhik, 2014), \(\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } x^{v - 1} e^{ - \mu x} dx = \frac{1}{{\mu^{v} }}\Gamma \left( v \right)\)
Following same steps as to evaluate \(P_{2}^{1}\) we can also solve
Putting \(Q_{1 }\) and \(Q_{2}\) to find \(P_{2}^{2} ,\) thus it completes the solution.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liaqat, M., Noordin, K.A., Latef, T.A. et al. Performance evaluation of multiple relay SWIPT enabled cooperative NOMA network in the presence of interference. Wireless Netw 30, 2381–2394 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-024-03669-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-024-03669-6