Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Efficient Sensor Deployment Control Schemes and Performance Evaluation for Obstacle and Unknown Environments

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deployment is a fundamental issue for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). A well-designed deployment control method not only directly influences the number of deployed sensors, but also influences on data accuracy and network topology. Three widely discussed deployment methods are random deployment, deterministic deployment and deployment by graphic theory. Most related works have focused on the maximal deployment area problem, but few studies have considered efficient methods to solve the k-coverage problem. Moreover, such methods have high time complexity, making them unsuitable for k-covered sensor deployment. To achieve scalable and efficient deployment, this study presents two new topology deployment methods, namely the slow-start method (SSM) and square-encircled method (SEM). The proposed deployment methods can yield k-covered scenarios with minimal overlapping areas, by three different coverage sensors. SSM and SEM are without needing to pre-analyze unknown or unsafe environments when deploying a k-coverage area. Deploying and satisfying each layer until k layers are obtained requires guaranteeing k coverage. The proposed methods have time complexities of O(n 2), making them suitable for WSNs. Moreover, this study first presents nine Construct Performance Evaluation (CPE) factors to evaluate the total costs of a WSN. Finally, this study evaluates the total deployment costs through CPE factors, and analyzes their performance. The simulation results clearly indicate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed deployment methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. AboElFotoh H.M.F., Iyengar S.S., Chakrabarty K. (2005). Computing reliability and message delay for cooperative wireless distributed sensor networks subject to random failures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 54(1): 145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams, Z., Goel, A., & Plotkin, S. (2004). Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of Third Int. Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2004), pp. 424–432.

  3. Bejerano Y. (2004). Efficient integration of multihop wireless and wired networks with QoS constraints. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 12(6): 1064–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beutel, J., Dyer, M., Meier, L., & Thiele, L. (2005). Scalable topology control for deployment-support networks. In Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2005), pp. 359–363.

  5. Bulusu N., Heidemann J., Estrin D., Tran T. (2004). Self-configuring localization systems: design and experimental evaluation. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) 3(1): 24–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cărbunar B., Grama A., Vitek J., Cărbunar O. (2006). Redundancy and coverage detection in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 2(1): 94–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerpa A., Estrin D. (2004). ASCENT: Adaptive self-configuring sensor networks topologies. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 3(3): 272–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Felemban E., Lee C.G., Ekici E. (2006). MMSPEED: Multipath Multi-SPEED protocol for QoS guarantee of reliability and timeliness in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 5(6): 738–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta H., Zhou Z.H., Das S.R., Gu Q. (2006). Connected sensor cover: Self-organization of sensor networks for efficient query execution. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 14(1): 55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou Y.T., Shi Y., Sherali H.D., Midkiff S.F. (2005). On energy provisioning and relay node placement for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 4(5): 2579–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, C. F., & Tseng, Y. C. (2003). Routing, coverage, and topology control: The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of 2nd ACM International Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 115–121.

  12. Huang C.F., Tseng Y.C. (2005). A survey of solutions to the coverage problems in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Internet Technology 6(1): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kawahara, Y., Kawanishi, N., Morikawa, H., & Aoyama, T. (2004). Top-down approach toward building ubiquitous sensor network applications. In Proceedings of 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 695–702.

  14. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., & Balogh, J. (2004). On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network. In Proceedings of 10th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom 2004), pp. 144–158.

  15. Lee, J. J., Krishnamachari, B., & Kuo, C. C. J. (2004). Impact of heterogeneous deployment on lifetime sensing coverage in sensor networks. In Proceedings of First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (IEEE SECON 2004), pp. 367–376.

  16. Li W., Cassandras C.G. (2005). A minimum-power wireless sensor network self-deployment scheme. In Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 3, 1897–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin C.Y., Peng W.C., Tseng Y.C. (2006). Efficient in-network moving object tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 5(8): 1044–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma Y., Aylor J. H. (2004). System lifetime optimization for heterogeneous sensor networks with a hub-spoke technology. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 3(3): 286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Megerian S., Koushanfar F., Potkonjak M., Srivastava M.B. (2005). Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 4(1): 84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mhatre V.P., Rosenberg C., Kofman D., Mazumdar R., Shroff N. (2005). A minimum cost heterogeneous sensor network with a lifetime constraint. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 4(1): 4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Passos, R. M., Coelho, C. J. N., Loureiro, A. A. F., & Mini, R. A. F. (2005). Dynamic power management in wireless sensor networks: An application-driven approach. In Proceedings of Second Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (2005 WONS), pp. 109–118.

  22. Rachlin, Y., Negi, R., & Khosla, P. (2005). Sensing capacity for discrete sensor network applications. In Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2005), pp. 126–132.

  23. Subramanian, R., & Fekri, F. (2006). Sleep scheduling and lifetime maximization in sensor networks: Fundamental limits and optimal solutions. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2006), pp. 218–225.

  24. Wang, G., Cao, G., & Porta, T. L. (2004). Proxy-based sensor deployment for mobile sensor networks. In Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems, pp. 493–502.

  25. Wang, Y. C., Hu, C. C., & Tseng, Y. C. (2005). Efficient deployment algorithms for ensuring coverage and connectivity of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Wireless Internet, pp. 114–121.

  26. Werner-Allen G., Lorincz K., Ruiz M., Marcillo O., Johnson J., Lees J., Welsh M. (2006). Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano. IEEE Internet Computing 10(2): 18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, J., & Yang, S. (2005). SMART: A scan-based movement-assisted sensor deployment method in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2005), 4, 2313–2324.

  28. Xing, L., & Shrestha, A. (2006). QoS reliability of hierarchical clustered wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of 25th IEEE International on Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC 2006), pp. 641–646.

  29. Zhou, Z., Das, S., & Gupta, H. (2004). Variable radii connected sensor cover in sensor networks. In Proceedings of 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (IEEE SECON 2004), pp. 387–396.

  30. Zou Y., Chakrabarty K. (2004). Sensor deployment and target localization in distributed sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems 3(1): 61–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Information Systems, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan, ROC

    Hsu-Yang Kung

  2. Department of Computer Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan, ROC

    Chung-Ming Huang & Hao-Hsaing Ku

Authors
  1. Hsu-Yang Kung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chung-Ming Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hao-Hsaing Ku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsu-Yang Kung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kung, HY., Huang, CM. & Ku, HH. Efficient Sensor Deployment Control Schemes and Performance Evaluation for Obstacle and Unknown Environments. Wireless Pers Commun 45, 231–263 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-007-9411-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-007-9411-z

Keywords