Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Analysis of Prefix Delegation-Based Route Optimization Schemes: Effects of Increasing the Number of Nodes

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prefix delegation-based schemes have been proposed to solve the route optimization problem in NEtwork MObility where multiple IP-enabled hosts move together as a mobile network. Differences in the route optimization for hosts at the cost of increased signaling will result in performance difference of the schemes depending on parameters, such as speed of the mobile network, its distance from the home network (the network to which mobile network usually belongs), and the number of hosts in the mobile network. Although the effects of the first two parameters on the performance of the schemes have been studied, effects of increasing the number of hosts have not been studied. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate performance when the number of hosts is increased. We perform the evaluation through ns-2 simulation. Results show that the performance superiority achieved by the hosts’ route optimization is only affected by the distance significantly only when the number of hosts is small. The results will help to decide when to use the route optimization for hosts depending on the values of the parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A., & Thubert, P. (2005). NEtwork MObility (NEMO) basic support protocol, RFC 3963, January 2005.

  2. Watari M., Ernst T., Murai J. (2006) Routing optimization for nested mobile networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications E 89-B(10): 2786–2793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng, C., Zhao, F., Watari, M., & Thubert, P. (2007). Network mobility route optimization solution space analysis, RFC 4889, July 2007.

  4. Lim H.-J., Lee D., Kim T., Chung T. (2005) A model and evaluation of route optimization in nested NEMO environment. IEICE Transactions on Communications E 88-B(7): 2765–2776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shahriar, A. Z. M., Atiquzzaman, M., & Ivancic, W. (2010). Route optimization in network mobility: Solutions, classification, comparison, and future research directions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(1), 24–38. First Quarter.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shahriar, A. Z. M., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2009). Evaluation of prefix delegation-based route optimization schemes for NEMO. In IEEE International Conference on Communications. Germany: Dresden, June 14–18 2009.

  7. Lee, K., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2003). Route optimization for mobile nodes in mobile network based on prefix delegation. In IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. Orlando, Florida, USA, October 6–9 2003.

  8. Calderon M., Bernardos C. J., Bagnulo M., Soto I., de la Oliva A. (2006) Design and experimental evaluation of a route optimization solution for NEMO. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24(9): 1702–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park, H., Lee, T., & Choo, H. (2005). Optimized path registration with prefix delegation in nested mobile networks. In International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks. Wuhan, China, December 13–15 2005.

  10. Perera E., Sivaraman V., Seneviratne A. (2004) Survey on network mobility support. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 8(2): 7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qureshi, R., Shahriar, A. Z. M., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2008). Performance of prefix delegation based route optimization schemes for NEMO. In IEEE Military Communication. San Diego, California, November 2008 17–19.

  12. Shahriar A. Z. M., Qureshi R., Atiquzzaman M. (2011) Perfromance of prefix delegation-based route optimization schemes for NEMO. Wireless Personal Communications 56(3): 469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahriar, A. Z. M., Atiquzzaman, M., & Ivancic, W. (2010). Performance of prefix delegation-based route optimization schemes: Intra mobile network case. University of Oklahoma, http://cs.ou.edu/~atiq/publication/technical.php, Tech. Rep. TR-OU-TNRL-10-102. (Accepted in ICC 2010), January 2010.

  14. Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., & Yegin, A. (2008). Protocol for carrying authentication for network access (PANA), RFC 5191, May 2008.

  15. Bernardos C. J., Gramaglia M., Contreras L. M., Calderon M., Soto I. (2010) Network-based localized IP mobility management: Proxy mobile IPv6 and current trends in standardization. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications 1(2/3): 16–35

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yan Z., Zhou H., You I. (2010) N-NEMO, a comprehensive network mobility solution in proxy Mobile IPv6 network. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications 1(2/3): 52–70

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fall, K., & Varadhan, K. (eds.) The network simulator ns-2: Documentation. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ns-documentation.html.

  18. Johnson, D. B., Parkins, C. E., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6, RFC 3775, June 2004.

  19. Morris R. (1997). TCP behavior with many flows. In IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols. Atlanta, Georgia, October 29–31 1997.

  20. Miyakawa, S., & Droms, R. (2004). Requirements for IPv6 prefix delegation, RFC 3769, June 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abu Zafar M. Shahriar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shahriar, A.Z.M., Atiquzzaman, M. Performance Analysis of Prefix Delegation-Based Route Optimization Schemes: Effects of Increasing the Number of Nodes. Wireless Pers Commun 61, 679–695 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0426-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0426-0

Keywords

Navigation