Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive Priority Sliding Admission Control and Scheduling Scheme for DCF and EDCA WLANs

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper an Adaptive Priority Sliding Admission Control and Scheduling (APSAS) scheme is proposed to provide QoS over the existing IEEE802.11 WLANs which operate on Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) mechanisms. The roles of this scheme are generally two folds: (1) To control the number of delay-sensitive real time flows that can be admitted into the WLAN Basic Service Set network and (2) To adjust the priority of selected real time flows in order to accommodate more real time flows without violating the QoS requirement. Extensive simulation studies show that APSAS improves the total throughput, flow throughput ratio, packets end-to-end delay, and jitter of the real time applications when compared with conventional best effort and scheduling-enhanced DCF/EDCA. APSAS also offers near to unity average throughput ratio, lower mean VoIP end-to-end packet delay (<130 ms) and lower mean video packet jitter (<130 ms) over DCF and EDCA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEEE 802.11a WG, Part 11 (1999). Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specification: High-speed physical layer in the 5 GHz Band.

  2. IEEE 802.11b WG, Part 11 (1999). Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specification: High-speed physical layer extension in the 2.4 GHz Band, IEEE.

  3. IEEE Std 802.11g/D1.1, Part11 (2001). Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: Further higher-speed physical layer extension in the 2.4 GHz Band.

  4. Wi-Fi technical details. http://www.btopenzone.com/help/technical-details/index.jsp

  5. BT lights up half a million wifi hotspots. Telecoms. com, August 20, 2009 http://www.telecoms.com/13962/bt-lights-up-half-a-million-wifi-hotspots

  6. 802.11n Device Unit Shipments Grow by 85 % Year over Year. In-Stat, July 21, 2010 http://www.instat.com/newmk.asp?ID=2816&SourceID=00000652000000000000

  7. IEEE Std 802.11eTM-2005, Part 11 (2005). Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: Medium access control (MAC) Quality of Service Enhancements.

  8. Liu T. H., Liao W. J., Lee J. F. (2009) Distributed contention-aware call admission control for IEEE 802.11 multi-radio multi-rate multi-channel wireless mesh networks. Mobile Networks and Applications 1572-8153 14(2): 134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yilmaz O., Chen I. R. (2009) Utilizing call admission control for pricing optimization of multiple service classes in wireless cellular networks. Computer Communications 32(2): 317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakajima, K., Mase, K., Okada H., (2009). A congestion control scheme for layer 3 wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the 15th Asia-Pacific conference on communications, APCC 2009, pp. 722–725.

  11. Gracia R. S., Yannuzzi M., Tordera E. M., Bruin X. M., Sanchez S. (2010) Quality of experience enforcement in wireless networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6074/2010: 180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alwakeel S.S., Alotaibi N.M. (2011) End-to-end measurement based admission control VoIP protocol with loss policy. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences 23(1): 37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qaimkhani I. A., Hossain E. (2008) A novel QoS-aware MAC protocol for voice services over IEEE802.11-based WLANs. Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing 9: 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu R., Zhang Y., Huang C. (2010) Joint admission and rate control for multimedia sharing in wireless home networks. Computer Communications 33: 1–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang C. J., Hu K. W., Chen Y. J., Luo Y. C. (2009) A QoS-aware VoD resource sharing scheme for heterogeneous networks. Computer Networks 53: 1087–1098

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Cano C., Bellalta B., Sfairopoulou A. (2010) Tuning the EDCA parameters in WLANs with heterogeneous traffic: A flow-level analysis. Computer Networks 54(13): 2199–2214

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rebai , A. R., Hanafi S. (2011) A dynamic multimedia user-weight classification scheme for IEEE802.11 WLANs. International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications (IJCNC) 3(2): 217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lagkas T., Chatzimisios P. (2011) AWPP: A new scheme for wireless access control proportional to traffic priority and rate. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2011: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zorba N., Verikoukis C. (2010) A QoS-based dynamic queue length scheduling algorithm in multiantenna heterogeneous systems. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2010: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. LiMing , Zhu H., Prabhakaran B. (2010) Dynamic priority re-allocation scheme for quality of service in IEEE 802.11e wireless networks. Wireless Networks 16: 759–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pang W. L., Chieng D., Nadia N. (2009) Enhanced layer 3 service differentiation for WLAN. WSEAS Transactions on Systems 8(5): 649–658

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed, M., Fadeel, G. A., Ibrahim, I. I. (2010). Differentiation between different traffic categories using multi-level of priority in DCF-WLAN. In Sixth advanced international conference on telecommunications, pp. 262–267, 9–15.

  23. Pang W.L., Chieng D., Nadia N. (2010) A practical layer 3 admission control and adaptive scheduling (L3-ACAS) for COTS WLANs. Wireless Personal Communication 16(13): 655–674

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yilmaz O., Chen I. R. (2009) Elastic threshold-based admission control for QoS satisfaction with reward optimization for servicing multiple priority classes in wireless networks. Information Processing Letters 109(15): 868–875

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Cetinkaya C. (2009) Service differentiation mechanisms for WLANs. Ad Hoc Networks 8(1): 46–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao Y., Li F. H., Choi S. (2009) Two-level protection and guarantee for multimedia traffic in IEEE 802.11e distributed WLANs. Wireless Networks 1022 0038 15(2): 141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim S., Cho Y.J., Kim Y.K. (2009) Admission control scheme based on priority access for wireless LANs. Computer Networks 54(1): 3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Floyd S., Jacobson V. (1995) Link-sharing and resource management models for packet networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 3: 365–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. The Network Simulator—ns2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai Leong Pang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, W.L., Chieng, D. & Ahmad, N.N. Adaptive Priority Sliding Admission Control and Scheduling Scheme for DCF and EDCA WLANs. Wireless Pers Commun 70, 295–321 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-012-0695-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-012-0695-2

Keywords

Navigation