Skip to main content
Log in

A Study on Project Selection Framework for Future ICT Technologies

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the broadcasting communication R&D subject supported by the government is diversifying gradually, it becomes more difficult to prioritize investment of limited resources. In this respect, the importance of a strict and objective evaluation index for the national R&D project is growing much bigger in using available resources to achieve the corresponding goal by the R&D project. In addition, recently, the importance of a method to effectively express and evaluate achievement of targets, selection of projects and allocation of resources etc. in the whole process of the national R&D project is being emphasized for the scientific national R&D project. To improve efficiency and effectiveness of the process to select the broadcasting communication R&D project, therefore, this study would like to investigate methodologies and models to select projects including more systematic and scientific verification systems and indexes etc. for the R&D planning suitable for the broadcasting communication field focused on major precedent studies and advanced cases and to derive a method to improve them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Padhy, R. K., & Sahu, S. (2011). A real option based six Sigma project evaluation and selection model. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1091–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, J., & Askin, R. G. (2009). Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1), 23–34.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 58, 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Riaz, M. T., Nielsen, R. H., Pedersen, J. M., Prasad, N. R., & Madsen, O. B. (2010). A framework for planning a unified wired and wireless ICT infrastructure. Wireless Personal Communications, 54(1), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuroda, M., Yoshida, M., Ono, R., Kiyomoto, S., & Tanaka, T. (2004). Secure service and network framework for mobile ethernet. Wireless Personal Communications, 29(3–4), 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carazo, A. F., Gómez, T., Molina, J., Hernández-Díaz, A. G., Guerrero, F. M., & Caballero, R. (2010). Solving a comprehensive model for multiobjective project portfolio selection. Computers & Operations Research, 37(4), 630–639.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Liang, C., & Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 810–820.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Halouani, N., Chabchoub, H., & Martel, J.-M. (2009). PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(3), 841–849.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shakhsi-Niaei, M., Torabi, S. A., & Iranmanesh, S. H. (2011). A comprehensive framework for project selection problem under uncertainty and real-world constraint. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(1), 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santamaría, L., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2010). Public selection and financing of R &D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding. Research Policy, 39(4), 549–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2001). An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooij, T. (2004). Optimising ICT effectiveness in instruction and learning: Multilevel transformation theory and a pilot project in secondary education. Computers & Education, 42(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, N. R. (1975). R &D project selection models: An assessment. R &D Management, 5(S1), 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J., Xu, Y., & Li, Z. (2009). Research on project selection system of pre-evaluation of engineering design project bidding. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 584–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a 2013 Research Grant from Sangmyung University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hangbae Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Chang, H. A Study on Project Selection Framework for Future ICT Technologies. Wireless Pers Commun 73, 1591–1600 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1268-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1268-8

Keywords