Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Imperfect Channel Information on the Performance of Underlay Cognitive DF Multi-hop Systems

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis framework for performance evaluation of underlay cognitive decode-and-forward (DF) multi-hop systems over Rayleigh fading channel under imperfect channel information. Specifically, we derive the exact closed-form bit error rate (BER) and interference probability (i.e., the probability that the interference power constraint is invalid) expressions. The derived expressions are well supported by simulations and serve as useful tools for fast system performance evaluation under different aspects. To reduce the interference probability, we consider the back-off power control mechanism. Various results demonstrate the effect of channel information imperfection on the system performance and the trade-off between the interference probability and BER. Also, the performance of underlay cognitive DF multi-hop systems depends both network topology and the number of hops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Khuong and Bao [14] only derives the approximate closed-form BER expression.

  2. \(h \sim \mathcal CN (m,v)\) denotes a \(m\)-mean circular symmetric complex Gaussian random variable with variance \(v\).

  3. The CSI imperfection model in [15] and [16] is \({\hat{h}_{tr}} = {\rho _{tr}}{h_{tr}} + \sqrt{1 - \rho _{tr}^2} {\varepsilon _{tr}}\) where \(\rho _{tr}\) is the correlation coefficient between \(\hat{h}_{tr}\) and \(h_{tr}\).

  4. The average BER of other modulation schemes such as \(M\)-PSK can be derived in the same approach.

  5. The study of channel estimators is outside the scope of this paper. Therefore, the selection of \(B_{t,training}\) in this paper is just an example to demonstrate the effect of CSI imperfection on BER of underlay cognitive relay systems.

References

  1. FCC. (2002). Spectrum policy task force report. ET Docket 02-135.

  2. Mitola, J. III (2000). Cognitive radio an integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Teleinformatics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

  3. Lee, J., Wang, H., Andrews, J. G., & Hong, D. (2011). Outage probability of cognitive relay networks with interference constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10, 390–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldsmith, A., Jafar, S. A., Maric, I., & Srinivasa, S. (2009). Breaking spectrum gridlock with cognitive radios: An information theoretic perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97, 894–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50, 3062–3080.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jun-pyo, H., Bi, H., et al. (2012). On the cooperative diversity gain in underlay cognitive radio systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caijun, Z., Ratnarajah, T., & Kai-Kit, W. (2011). Outage analysis of decode-and-forward cognitive dual-hop systems with the interference constraint in Nakagami-m fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60, 2875–2879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, Z., Zhang, X., & Wang, W. (2011). Exact outage performance of cognitive relay networks with maximum transmit power limits. IEEE Communication Letters, 15, 1317–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho-Van, K. (2012). Exact outage probability of underlay cognitive cooperative networks over Rayleigh fading channels. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.1007/s11277-012-0742-z. Published online July 8, 2012.

  10. Liping, L., Ping, Z., et al. (2011). Outage performance for cognitive relay networks with underlay spectrum sharing. IEEE Communication Letters, 15, 710–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, P., Luo, L., et al. (2012). Outage performance of cognitive relay networks with interference from primary user. IEEE Communication Letters, 10, 1695–1698.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain, S. I., Abdallah, M. M., Alouini, M. S., Hasna, M., & Qaraqe, K. (2011). Performance analysis of selective cooperation in underlay cognitive networks over rayleigh channels. In IEEE SPAWC (pp. 116–120).

  13. Do, T., & Mark, B. (2010). Cooperative communication with regenerative relays for cognitive radio networks. In IEEE CISS (pp. 1–6).

  14. Khuong, H. V., & Bao, V. N. Q. (2012). Symbol error rate of underlay cognitive relay systems over Rayleigh fading channel. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E95–B(5), 1873–1877.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suraweera, H. A., Smith, P. J., et al. (2010). Capacity limits and performance analysis of cognitive radio with imperfect channel knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59, 1811–1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, J., Si, J., Li, Z., & Huang, H. (2012). On the performance of spectrum sharing cognitive relay networks with imperfect CSI. IEEE Communication Letters, 16, 1002–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed, N., Khojastepour, M., & Aazhang, B. (2004). Outage minimization and optimal power control for the fading relay channel. IEEE Information theory workshop (pp. 458–462). October 2004.

  18. Guo, Y., Kang, G., et al. (2010). Outage performance of relay-assisted cognitive-radio system under spectrum-sharing constraints. Electronics Letters, 46, 182–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amin, O., Ikki, S., et al. (2011). On the performance analysis of multirelay cooperative diversity systems with channel estimation errors. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60, 2050–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seungyoup, H., Seongwoo, A., et al. (2009). Effect of channel-estimation error on BER performance in cooperative transmission. IEEE Transactoins on Vehicular Technology, 58, 2083–2088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yi, W., & Patzold, M. (2009). Performance analysis of cooperative communication systems with imperfect channel estimation. In IEEE ICC pp. 1–6.

  22. Patel, C. S., & Stuber, G. L. (2007). Channel estimation for amplify and forward relay based cooperation diversity systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6, 2348–2356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho, K., & Yoon, D. (2002). On the general BER expression of one- and two-dimensional amplitude modulations. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 50, 1074–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Athanasios, P., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, random variables and stochastic process (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morgado, E., Mora-Jimenez, I., Vinagre, J. J., Ramos, J., & Caamano, A. J. (2010). End-to-end average ber in multihop wireless networks over fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9, 2478–2487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tellambura, C., & Jayalath, A. D. S. (2000). Generation of bivariate Rayleigh and Nakagami- m fading envelopes. IEEE Communications Letters, 4(5), 170–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2000). Table of integrals, series and products (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  28. Nuttall, A. H. (1972). Some integrals involving the Q-function. Technical report 4297. New London, CT: Naval Under- water Systems Center, April 1972.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 102.04-2012.39.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khuong Ho-Van.

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix derives \(P_t\) in (7). Let \(x = \left| {{{\hat{h}}_{tP}}} \right| \) and \(y = \left| {{h_{tP}}} \right| \). Then the joint pdf of \(x\) and \(y\) is expressed as [26]

$$\begin{aligned} {f_{x,y}}\left( {x,y} \right) = \frac{{4xy{e^{ - \frac{{{\eta _y}{x^2} + {\eta _x}{y^2}}}{{{\eta _x}{\eta _y}\left( {1 - {\rho _{xy}}} \right) }}}}}}{{{\eta _x}{\eta _y}\left( {1 - {\rho _{xy}}} \right) }}{I_0}\left( {\frac{{2\sqrt{{\rho _{xy}}} xy}}{{\sqrt{{\eta _x}{\eta _y}} \left( {1 - {\rho _{xy}}} \right) }}} \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(18)

where \({\eta _x} = E\left\{ {{x^2}} \right\} = {\eta _{tP}}-{\sigma _{tP}},\,{\eta _y} = E\left\{ {{y^2}} \right\} ={\eta _{tP}}\), and \({\rho _{xy}}\) is the power correlation coefficient.

Using (2) and the definition of \({\rho _{xy}} = \mathrm{cov}\left( {{x^2},{y^2}} \right) \Big /\sqrt{\mathrm{var} \left\{ x^{2}\right\} \mathrm{var} \left\{ y^{2} \right\} }\), we finally obtain

$$\begin{aligned} {\rho _{xy}} = 1 - \frac{{{\sigma _{tP}}}}{{{\eta _{tP}}}}. \end{aligned}$$
(19)

The joint pdf of \(z=x^2\) and \(w=y^2\) can be achieved from that of \(x\) and \(y\) after the variable transformation. After some simplifications, we get the joint pdf of \(z\) and \(w\) as

$$\begin{aligned} {f_{{z},{w}}}\left( {z,w} \right) = \frac{{{e^{ - \frac{{{\eta _{tP}}z + \left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) w}}{{\left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) {\sigma _{tP}}}}}}}}{{\left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) {\sigma _{tP}}}}{I_0}\left( {\frac{{2\sqrt{zw} }}{{{\sigma _{tP}}}}} \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(20)

where \(z,w>0\) and \(I_0()\) is the zeroth-order modified Bessel function of the first kind [27, eq. (8.431.1)].

We express \(P_t\) as

$$\begin{aligned} {P_t} = \Pr \left\{ {\rho w > z} \right\} = \int \limits _0^\infty {\int \limits _0^{\rho y} {{f_{z,w}}\left( {x,y} \right) dx} } dy = \int \limits _0^\infty {\int \limits _0^{\rho y} {\frac{{{e^{ - \frac{{{\eta _{tP}}x + \left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) y}}{{\left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) {\sigma _{tP}}}}}}}}{{\left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) {\sigma _{tP}}}}{I_0}\left( {\frac{{2\sqrt{xy} }}{{{\sigma _{tP}}}}} \right) dx} } dy.\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(21)

After changing the variable of \(t = \sqrt{x}\) and applying [28, eq. (10)], we simplify (21) as

$$\begin{aligned} {P_t} = 1 - \frac{1}{{{\eta _{tP}}}}\int \limits _0^\infty {{e^{ - \frac{y}{{{\eta _{tr}}}}}}Q\left( {\sqrt{\frac{{2\left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) }}{{{\eta _{tP}}{\sigma _{tP}}}}} \sqrt{y},\quad \sqrt{\frac{{2\rho {\eta _{tP}}}}{{\left( {{\eta _{tP}} - {\sigma _{tP}}} \right) {\sigma _{tP}}}}} \sqrt{y} } \right) } dy, \end{aligned}$$
(22)

where \(Q(a,b)\) is the first-order Marcum Q-function [28, eq. (1)].

Finally, we reduce (22) to (7) after changing the variable of \(t = \sqrt{y}\) and applying [28, eq. (55)].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho-Van, K. Impact of Imperfect Channel Information on the Performance of Underlay Cognitive DF Multi-hop Systems. Wireless Pers Commun 74, 487–498 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1301-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1301-y

Keywords

Navigation