Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Always Best Connected Heterogeneous Network Concept

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of always-best-connected (ABC) refers to a person’s ability to connect and use services with devices and access technologies that best suit to his or her needs. One of the recent standards to cover this concept is the 3rd Generation Partnership Project evolved packed system (EPS). It offers, an operator-friendly way to manage ABC connectivity in a heterogeneous network environment. However, the existing mobile devices are not supporting all of the requirements of EPS. At the same time, the standard is going through evolution where key elements such as mobility management protocols and procedures are still being developed. This research reviews and addresses constrains to the ABC concept through implementations in Android environment. The research shows that off-the-shelf devices are lacking the needed handover performance for real-time communication in a heterogeneous network. With the help of slightly modified device environments for simultaneous connections over different network access technologies, the results were approaching near real-time communication capability (delay around 100–200 ms depending of selected approach). The trade-offs in terms of energy consumption were measured. The discussion then leads to multihomed devices for really tapping the potential of seamless handovers with the ABC concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 3GPP. (2007). Generic access network (GAN); stage 2. TS 23.206, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23206.htm.

  2. 3GPP. (2008). IP multimedia subsystem (IMS); stage 2. TS 23.228, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23228.htm.

  3. 3GPP. (2011). Access network discovery and selection function (ANDSF) management object (MO); V10.3.0 release 10. TS 24.312, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/24312.htm.

  4. 3GPP. (2011). Access to the 3GPP evolved packet core (EPC) via non-3GPP access networks; stage 3. TS 24.302, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/24302.htm.

  5. 3GPP. (2011). Architecture enhancements for non-3GPP accesses; V10.4.0. TS 23.402, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23402.htm.

  6. 3GPP. (2011). Generic access network (GAN); stage 2. TS 43.318, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/43318.htm.

  7. 3GPP. (2011). GPRS tunnelling protocol (GTP) across the Gn and Gp interface. TS 29.060, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/29060.htm.

  8. 3GPP. (2011). Policy and charging control architecture; V10.4.0 release 10. TS 23.203, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23203.htm.

  9. Abley, J., Black, B., & Gill, V. (2003). Goals for IPv6 site-multihoming architectures. RFC 3582 (informational). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3582.txt.

  10. Bi, G., Zysman, I., & Menkes, H. (2001). Wireless mobile communications at the start of the 21st century. IEEE Wireless Communications, 39(1), 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boysen, E., & Flathagen, J. (2011). Using sip for seamless handover in heterogeneous networks. In Ultra modern telecommunications and control systems and workshops (ICUMT) (pp. 1–8).

  12. Ericsson. (2012). Ericsson mobility report. http://www.ericsson.com/ericsson-mobility-report.

  13. Ford, A., Raiciu, C., Handley, M., & Bonaventure, O. (2013). TCP extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses. RFC 6824 (experimental). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6824.txt.

  14. Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury, K., & Patil, B. (2008). Proxy mobile IPv6. RFC 5213 (proposed standard). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5213.txt (updated by RFC 6543).

  15. Handley, M., Paxson, V., & Kreibich, C. (2006). Why the internet only just works? BT Technology Journal, 24, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Honda, M., Nishida, Y., Raiciu, C., Greenhalgh, A., & Handley, M. (2011). Is it still possible to extend TCP? In 11th internet measurement conference (pp. 1–14).

  17. IEEE. (2008). Media independent handover services. Standard 802.21. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.21-2008.pdf.

  18. Kale, S., & Schwengler, T. (2009). Comparing unlicensed mobile access (UMA) and voice call continuity (VCC) architectures. In IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (pp. 1–2).

  19. Keller, R., Vorwerk, M., & Barschel, C. (2006). Voice call continuity—A novel mobility scheme for voice on call control level. In Vehicular technology conference (VTC-2006) (pp. 1–5).

  20. Kellokoski, J. (2012). Challenges of the always-best-connected enablers for user equipment in evolved packet system. In Ultra modern telecommunications and control systems and workshops (ICUMT).

  21. Kellokoski, J. (2013). Real-life multipath TCP based make-before-break vertical handover. In The IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC).

  22. Kellokoski, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2011). User-centric approach to always-best-connected networks. In Ultra modern telecommunications and control systems and workshops (ICUMT).

  23. Kellokoski, J., Koskinen, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2012). Power consumption analysis of the always-best-connected user equipment. In New technologies mobility and security (NTMS).

  24. Kellokoski, J., Koskinen, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2012). Real-life performance analysis of always-best-connected network. In New technologies mobility and security (NTMS).

  25. Kellokoski, J., Koskinen, J., Nyrhinen, R., & Hämäläinen, T. (2012). Efficient handovers for machine-to-machine communications between IEEE 802.11 and 3GPP evolved packed core networks. In The IEEE international conference on internet of things.

  26. Manner, J., & Kojo, M. (2004). Mobility related terminology. RFC 3753 (informational). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3753.txt.

  27. Mwangoka, J., Marques, P., & Rodriguez, J. (2010). Cognitive mobility management in heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on mobility management and wireless access.

  28. OMA. (2008). Enabler release definition for OMA device management. ERELD 1.2, open mobile alliance. http://www.openmobilealliance.org/technical/release_program/dm_v1_2.aspx.

  29. Perkins, C. (2010). IP mobility support for IPv4 (revised). RFC 5944 (proposed standard). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5944.txt.

  30. Poikoselkä, M., & Mayer, G. (2009). The IMS IP multimedia concepts and services. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Postel, J. (1980). DoD standard transmission control protocol. RFC 761. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc761.txt (obsoleted by RFC 793).

  32. Raiciu, C., Paasch, C., Barre, S., Ford, A., Honda, M., Duchene, F., et al. (2012). How hard can it be? Designing and implementing a deployable multipath TCP. In 9th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (pp. 1–13).

  33. Schmidt, M., Lamparter, B., & Schmid, S. (2008). Voice callcontinuity—A critical step towards all-IP based next generationnetworks. In Global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM) (Vol. 2008, pp. 1–5).

  34. Söderman, P., Grinnemo, K. J., Cheimonidis, G., Ismailov, Y., & Brunström, A. (2012). An SCTP-based mobility management framework for smartphones and tablets. In 26th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops (pp. 1107–1112).

  35. Soliman, H. (2009). Mobile IPv6 support for dual stack hosts and routers. RFC 5555 (proposed standard). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5555.txt.

  36. Stewart, R. (2007). Stream control transmission protocol. RFC 4960 (proposed standard). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4960.txt (updated by RFCs 6096, 6335).

  37. Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Tuexen, M., Maruyama, S., & Kozuka, M. (2007). Stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) dynamic address reconfiguration. RFC 5061 (proposed standard). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5061.txt.

  38. Tao, M., & Yu, H. (2010). A smooth handover scheme for fast-moving users in mobile IPv6 networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 14(2), 649–664.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wallace, T., & Shami, A. (2012). A review of multihoming issues using the stream contol transmission protocol. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(2), 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, L., Wenshengand, L., & Chunjian, D. (2009). Architecture supporting multiple MSCS in UMA/GAN networks. In Third international symposium on intelligent information technology application (pp. 102–105).

  41. Yaqub, R., Haq, I. U., & Yahya, K. (2008). Architecture supporting network discovery in future heterogeneous networks. In IEEE multitopic conference (INMIC) (pp. 313–317).

  42. Zekri, M., Pokhrel, J., Jouabel, B., & Zeghlache, D. (2011). Reputation for vertical handover decision making. In 17th Asia-Pacific conference on communications (APCC) (pp. 318–323).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematical Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 , Jyväskylä, Finland

    Jari Kellokoski, Joonas Koskinen & Timo Hämäläinen

Authors
  1. Jari Kellokoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joonas Koskinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Timo Hämäläinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jari Kellokoski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kellokoski, J., Koskinen, J. & Hämäläinen, T. Always Best Connected Heterogeneous Network Concept. Wireless Pers Commun 75, 63–80 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1348-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1348-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation