Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Performance Analysis of Different Link Layer Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a fair comparison between different representative link layer protocols for wireless sensor networks: S-MAC, DRAND and Z-MAC protocols. The performance of these protocols is evaluated in terms of power consumption, the use of the propagation channel resources and the traffic rate provided for each node and the overall aggregated traffic. For the experimentation and the performance analysis, an evaluation scenario is built up, including a set of nodes randomly placed around reference places. This scenario is evaluated under different circumstances and traffic load levels. In addition, some conflictive issues are included, such as the presence of ‘bottle necks’ or egoist nodes in the network, and their influence is analyzed for each protocol in order to determine which one copes better with hostile conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Di Francesco, M., & Passarella, A. (2009). Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(3), 537–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Padilla, P., Camacho, J., Maciá, G., García, P., Díaz, J. E., & Gómez-Calero, C. (2013). On the influence of the propagation channel in the performance of energy efficient geographic routing algorithms for wireless sensor networks (WSN). Wireless Personal Communications, 70(1), 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajendran, V., Obraczka, K., & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. (2006). Energy-efficient, collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Net-works, 12(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., & Chowdury, K. R. (2007). Wireless multimedia sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(6), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petcharat, S., Utz, R., & Andrew, S. (2012). A survey of MAC protocols for mission-critical applications in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(2), 240–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2004). Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 12(3), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dam. T., & Langendoen, K. (2003). An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In ACM proceedings of the 1st international conference on embedded networked sensor systems, New York, NY (pp. 171–180).

  9. Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Min, J., & Xu, L. (2009). DRAND: Distributed randomized TDMA scheduling for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(10), 1384–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Aia, M., Min, J., & Sichitiu, M. L. (2008). Z-MAC: a hybrid MAC for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 16(3), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Polstre, J., Hill, J., & Culler, D. (2004). Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In ACM proceedings of the 2st international conference on embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 95–107).

  12. Yoo, D., Park, S., Choi, S., & Park, S. H. (2008). Dynamic S-MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks based on network traffic states. 14th Asia-Pacific conference on communications, 14–16 Oct 2008.

  13. El-Hoiydi, A., & Decotignie, J. D. (2004). WiseMAC: an ultra-low power MAC protocol for the downlink of infrastructure wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Computers and Communications, 1, 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chang, Y. C., Jiang, J. R., Sheu, J. P., & Shih, H. Y. (2008). ADCA: An asynchronous duty cycle adjustment MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, IEEE GLOBECOM.

  15. Hu, W., Li, X., & Yousefizadeh, H. (2009). LA-MAC: A load adaptive MAC protocol for MANETs. IEEE global telecommunications conference, IEEE GLOBECOM.

  16. van Hoesel, L. F. W., Nieberg, T., Kip, H. J., & Havinga, P. J. M. (2004). Advantage of a TDMA based, energy-efficient, self-organizing MAC protocol for WSNs. In Proceeding of IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC) (pp. 1598–1602), 2004.

  17. van Hoesel, L. F. W., & Havinga, P. J. M. (2004). A lightweight medium access protocol (LMAC) for wireless sensor network: Reducing preamble transmissions and transceiver state switches. In Proceeding of international workshop on networked sensing systems (INSS) (pp. 1481–1486), Mar 16–20, 2004.

  18. Song, H., Chun, D. Y., & Chang, G. (2008). A modified directional MAC protocol for using smart antenna in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2008.

  19. The Network Simulator, NS–2: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by a PYR-2014 GENIL project (PYR-2014-CEB09-0010/MICINN), and a CEI BioTIC project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications – CITIC, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain

    Pablo Padilla, José-Vicente Serrán-González & Miguel Angel López-Gordo

  2. Department of Electronics and Computer Technology – CITIC, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain

    José Luis Padilla

  3. Department of Computer and Telematic Systems Engineering, University of Extremadura, 06800, Merida, Spain

    Juan F. Valenzuela-Valdés

Authors
  1. Pablo Padilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Luis Padilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan F. Valenzuela-Valdés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. José-Vicente Serrán-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miguel Angel López-Gordo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Padilla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padilla, P., Padilla, J.L., Valenzuela-Valdés, J.F. et al. Performance Analysis of Different Link Layer Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). Wireless Pers Commun 84, 3075–3089 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2783-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2783-6

Keywords