Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Study on Efficiency of Markup Language Using DOM Tree

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DOM and SAX are used usually in form parser for XML document processing. This study designed method of markup language using DOM tree extension and advantage about fast accessibility for XML document. Did so that can design simple type and complex type DOM tree use XML schema of DOM base and offer variety creating markup language. And markup language generation about MetaData that use DOM form improve reusability ratio of markup language because it is possible detailed data type expression and classified unit element.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nentwich, C., & Emmerich, W. (2000). BOX : Browsing objects in XML. Software-Practice and Experience, 30, 1661–1676.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kundu, D. (2012). An approach to convert XMI representation of UML 2.x interaction diagram into control flow graph. ISRN Software Engineering, 2012, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chien, S. Y., Tsotras, V. J., & Zaniolo, C. (2001). XMLDocument versioning. SIGMOD Record, 30(3), 46–53.

  4. Ishikawa, N., Kato, T., Ueno, H., Sumino, H., & Suzuki, H. (2002). Automatic generation of a differential XSL stylesheet from two XML documents. Yokosuka: Multimedia Laboratories, NTT DoCoMo 3-5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubey, P. (2012). Association rule mining on distributed data. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3(1), 139–144.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, D., & Chu, W. (2001). Constraint-preserving inlining algorithm for mapping XML DTD to relational schema. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 39, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papakonstantinou, Y., & Vianu, V. (2000). DTD inference for views of XML data. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, (pp. 35–46), Dallas, Texas.

  8. Sharma, S., & Tarun, S. (2014). Extraction of data from XMI file using heuristic approach. International Journal of Computer & Electronics Research, 3(3), 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biron, P. V., & Malhotra, A. (Eds.) (2000). XML schema Part 2: Datatypes. World Wide Web Consortium.

  10. Somkunwar, A. (2012). A study on various data mining approaches of association rules. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2(9), 141–144.

  11. Bedini, I. (2011). Transforming XML schema to OWL using patterns. In Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2011 Fifth IEEE International Conference, pp. 102–109.

  12. Thompson, H. S., Beech, D., Maloney, M., & Mendelsohn, N. (Eds.) (2000). XML schema part 1: Structures. World Wide Web Consortium.

  13. W3C (1999). Simple API for XML Version 2.0. WC3 Recommendation.

  14. Devsphere, XML parsing benchmark. http://www.devsphere.com/xml/benchmark/index.html.

  15. Idris, N. (1999) Should I use SAX or DOM. http://developerlife.com/saxvsdom/default.htm.

  16. Kiselyov, O. (2002). A better XMLparser through functional programming. LNCS 2257 (pp. 209–224). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Havasi, F. (2002). XML semantics extension. Acta Cybernetica, 15, 509–528.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-DOM-Level-1-19981001/introd-uction.html (1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of IT Convergence Engineering, Shinhan University, Uijeongbu, Korea

    Hanyong Choi

  2. Department of Liberal Education, Semyung University, Jecheon, Korea

    Sungho Sim

Authors
  1. Hanyong Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sungho Sim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungho Sim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, H., Sim, S. A Study on Efficiency of Markup Language Using DOM Tree. Wireless Pers Commun 86, 143–163 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3057-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3057-z

Keywords