Skip to main content
Log in

A Method for Measuring Cooperative Activities in a Social Network Supported Learning Environment

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperative learning, which can foster an active learner-oriented learning environment and induce active interaction among students, is an important element that can enhance the effects of learning in the online learning environment as well. As most existing studies on cooperative learning are based only on a qualitative evaluation in the offline environment, however, it is difficult to measure cooperative learning in the online learning environment. Thus, for this study a group cooperative activity (GCA) was proposed to quantitatively measure the cooperative learning of learners in the online learning environment, and a social network analysis (SNA) method was used to visualize the cooperative activities among the learners. The result of the experiment shows that the GCA among teachers was higher than the GCA among learners in the Formal Learning Group, whereas many high-density network models were observed in the Non-Formal Learning Group and the GCA among learners was higher. The proposed GCA uses the interaction data generated among the learner group to measure its cooperative learning. Also, this study verified the effectiveness of the GCA by using an SNA for visualization purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., Wang, S. M., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60(1), 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan, B. (Ed.). (1997). Web-based instruction. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jeong, I. S., Lim, C. I., Choi, S. H., & Lim, J. H. (2000). Effects of different types of interaction on learning and satisfaction in a web-based lifelong learning environment. Journal of Education and Technology, 16(16), 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jo, J., et al. (2014). An integrated teaching and learning assistance system meeting requirements for smart education. Wireless Personal Communications, 79(4), 2453–2467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harasim, L. M. (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. X. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ji, H., et al. (2015). Mining students activities from a computer supported collaborative learning system based on peer to peer network. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 1–12, ISSN:1936-6450 (Online).

  10. Hekimoglu, S., & Kittrell, E. (2010). Challenging students’ beliefs about mathematics: The use of documentary to alter perceptions of efficacy. Primus, 20(4), 299–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspective, and practice (pp. 3–7). New York: Teachers College Press.

  13. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM.

  15. Sohn, J. S., Bae, U. B., & Chung, I. J. (2013). Contents recommendation method using social network analysis. Wireless Personal Communications, 73(4), 1529–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papa, M. J., & Tracy, K. (1988). Communicative indices of employee performance with new technology. Communication Research, 15(5), 524–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Albrecht, T. L., & Hall, B. J. (1991). Facilitating talk about new ideas: The role of personal relationships in organizational innovation. Communications Monographs, 58(3), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Laat, M. (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. In Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 625–626.

  19. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mylläri, J., Åhlberg, M., & Dillon, P. (2010). The dynamics of an online knowledge building community: a 5-year longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2013). Knowledge-based policy conflict analysis in mobile social networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 73(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blazovics, L., et al. (2011). Future cooperative communication systems driven by social mobile networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 57(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deuker, A., & Albers, A. (2012). Who cares? Content sharing on social networking sites: A grounded theory study. In PACIS (p. 156).

  28. European Communities. (2006). Classification of learning activities—Manual, Eurostat, ISSN 1725-0056.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the ICT R&D program of MSIP/IITP (2015, Development of distribution and diffusion service technology through individual and collective intelligence of digital contents).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heuiseok Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J., Ji, H., Jo, J. et al. A Method for Measuring Cooperative Activities in a Social Network Supported Learning Environment. Wireless Pers Commun 89, 863–879 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3100-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3100-0

Keywords

Navigation