Skip to main content
Log in

A Trend Analysis Method for IoT Technologies Using Patent Dataset with Goal and Approach Concepts

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the recent tremendous advances in Internet of Things (IoT), analyzing technology trends and providing high quality services also play an important role in analyzing big data. Patent data has been on the rise, and the importance of patents also has been increasing to demand a company’s competitiveness and to claim technology rights since patents contain important feature technologies that can be used to analyzing new technology trends and to find competitor companies or technologies. Especially IoT techniques are evolving rapidly and a number of new technologies have emerged. Hence a variety of analysis techniques on inventions patented by specific companies are required. In this paper, a trend analysis method is proposed to extract patterns from patent dataset using ETI relations. The experiment results based on the real patent dataset of IoT domain invented a specific organization show that the characteristics of the organization that have the expansion relations is 98.6 % and the transition relations is 1.4 % among ETI relations. Furthermore, we verify proposed dictionaries are useful for enhancing the accuracy to extract ETI relations from a patent network automatically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tao, F., Zuo, Y., Xu, L. D., & Zhang, L. (2014). IoT based intelligent perception and access of manufacturing resource towards cloud manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1547–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, J., Jeong, D. H., Lee, D., & Jung, H. (2015). User-centered innovative technology analysis and prediction application in mobile environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(20), 8761–8779.

  3. DELICATO, Flavia C., et al. (2013). Towards an IoT ecosystem. In The first international workshop on software engineering for systems-of-systems. ACM, pp. 25–28.

  4. Malkawi, M. I. (2013). The art of software systems development: Reliability, availability, maintainability, performance (RAMP). Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 3(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tekic, Z., Drazic, M., Kukolj, D., & Vitas, M. (2014). From patent data to business intelligence–PSALM case studies. Procedia Engineering, 69, 296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jung, S. (2003). Importance of using patent information. WIPO—Most intermediate training course on practical intellectual property issues in business, organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Geneva, November 10, 14.

  7. Dou, H., Leveillé, V., Manullang, S. D., & Dou, J. M, Jr. (2005). Patent analysis for competitive technical intelligence and innovative thinking. Data Science Journal, 4(31), 209–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim, J. (2014). Analysis of the relationship between patent litigation and citation: Subdivision of citations. Appl. Math, 8(5), 2515–2522.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rho, Seungmin. (2014). Big data analysis platform technology R&D trend through patent analysis. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(9), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thoma, G. (2014). Composite value index of patent indicators: Factor analysis combining bibliographic and survey datasets. World Patent Information, 38, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brahami, M., Atmani, B., & Matta, N. (2013). Dynamic knowledge mapping guided by data mining: Application on Healthcare. JIPS, 9(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, Y. S., & Moon, S. C. (2013). Weighted mining frequent pattern based customer’s RFM score for personalized u-commerce recommendation system. Journal of Convergence, 4(4), 36–40.

  15. Campbell, Richard S. (1983). Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool. World Patent Information, 5(3), 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Courtial, J. P., Callon, M., & Sigogneau, A. (1993). The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends. Scientometrics, 26(2), 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Segev, A., & Kantola, J. (2012). Identification of trends from patents using self-organizing maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(18), 13235–13242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, T. J., Lee, M. S., & Choi, H. N. (2010). Analysis of technology trends from words in patent titles. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(4), 433–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Namsrai, E., Munkhdalai, T., Li, M., Shin, J. H., Namsrai, O. E., & Ryu, K. H. (2013). A feature selection-based ensemble method for arrhythmia classification. JIPS, 9(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blanchard, A. (2007). Understanding and customizing stopword lists for enhanced patent mapping. World Patent Information, 29(4), 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Müller, D., & Yi, M. Y. (2014). Annotating korean text documents with linked data resources. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 68(2), 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palumbo, M. (2013). Commentary: COOPERATIVE PATENT CLASSIFICATION: A new era for the world’s intellectual property offices. Technology & Innovation, 15(2), 125–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Montecchi, T., Russo, D., & Liu, Y. (2013). Searching in cooperative patent classification: Comparison between keyword and concept-based search. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27(3), 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the IT R&D program of MSIP/IITP. [B010-15-0353, High performance database solution development for integrated big data monitoring and analytics]. Hanming Jung is the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanmin Jung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gim, J., Lee, J., Jang, Y. et al. A Trend Analysis Method for IoT Technologies Using Patent Dataset with Goal and Approach Concepts. Wireless Pers Commun 91, 1749–1764 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3276-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3276-y

Keywords

Navigation