Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Analysis on Filter Parameters and Sub-bands Distribution of Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of 5G communication, the new non-orthogonal multi-carrier transmission technology has been paid more attention. A filtering operation is made on a group of continuous subcarriers in Universal-filtered multi-carrier (UFMC), making the orthogonality among the subcarriers no longer exist. Such feature has relaxed the strict constraint of synchronization between the various devices, and makes it more suitable for the needs of 5G. On the other hand, the non orthogonality causes the mutual interference among the subcarriers and sub-bands. If the interference is effectively reduced, the performance of UFMC can be improved. In this paper, the factor of true power ratio is proposed to evaluate the inter-band interference. Furthermore, with the specific filter parameters, an appropriate sub-band interval can reduce the energy interference between the sub-bands especially in the uplinks. Simulation result shows that the method can reduce the symbol error rate and improve the transmission performance of UFMC by deploying the sub-band with optimized interval. Especially in high SNR environment, the deployment of shorter filter and neighboring sub-bands shows a better performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wunder, G., Jung, P., Kasparick, M., et al. (2014). 5GNOW: Non-orthogonal asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gavrilovska, L., Rakovic, V., & Atanasovski, V. (2015). Visions towards 5G: Technical requirements and potential enablers. Wireless Personal Communications, 87, 731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banelli, P., Buzzi, S., Colavolpe, G., et al. (2014). Modulation formats and waveforms for 5G networks: Who will be the heir of OFDM. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 31, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Modenini, A., Rusek, F., & Colavolpe, G. (2014). Faster-than-Nyquist signaling for next generation communication architectures. In European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO), Lisbon, Portugal.

  5. Wunder, G., Kasparick, M., ten Brink, S., et. al. (2013). 5GNOW: Challenging the LTE design paradigms of orthogonality and synchronicity. In IEEE VTC., Dresden, Germany, pp. 1–5.

  6. Aldmour, I. (2017). Wireless broadband tools and their evolution towards 5G networks. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4058-x.

  7. Schaich, F., & Wild, T. (2014). Waveform contenders for 5G—OFDM vs. FBMC vs. UFMC. In Proceedings of 6th international symposium on communications, control, and signal processing (ISCCSP 2014), Athens, Greece, pp. 457–460.

  8. Chávez-Santiago, R., Szydełko, M., Kliks, A., et al. (2015). 5G: The convergence of wireless communications. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(3), 1617–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vakilian, V., Wild, T., Schaich, F., et al. (2013). Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE. In Proceedings of 9th international workshop on broadband wireless access, IEEE Globecom’13, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 223–228.

  10. METIS. (2015). D2.4: Proposed solutions for new radio access. https://www.metis2020.com/documents/deliverables/.

  11. IMT-2020 (5G) Promotion Group. (2015). White paper on 5G wireless technology architecture. http://www.imt-2020.org.cn/zh/documents/download/63.

  12. Wild, T., Schaich, F., & Chen, Y. (2014). 5G air interface design based on Universal Filtered(UF-)OFDM. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on digital signal processing.

  13. Schaich, F., Wild, T., & Chen, Y. (2014). Waveform contenders for 5G suitability for short packet and low latency transmissions. In IEEE vehicular technology conference Spring (VTC’14 Spring).

  14. Wang, X. J., Wild, T., Schaich, F., et al. (2014). Universal filtered multi-carrier with leakage-based filter optimization. In European Wireless 2014, pp. 963–967.

  15. Wang, X., Wild, T., & Schaich, F. (2014). Filter optimization for carrier frequency and timing offsets in univeral filtered multi-carrier system. In IEEE ISWCS’14, Barcelona.

  16. Wang, X. (2014). Channel estimation and equalization for 5G wireless communication systems, University of Stuttgart.

  17. Mithun, M., Vikas, K., Gagnesh, K., et al. (2015). Reduced out-of-band radiation-based filter optimization for UFMC systems in 5G. In IEEE VTC.

  18. Chen, Y., Schaich, F., & Wild, T. (2014). Multiple access and waveforms for 5G: IDMA and universal filtered multi-carrier. In Proceeding. IEEE VTCs14, Seoul, Korea.

  19. Schaich, F., & Wild, T. (2014). Relaxed synchronization support of universal filtered multi-carrier including autonomous timing advance. In Wireless communications systems (ISWCS).

  20. Li, Y., Tian, B., Yi, K., & Yu, Q. (2017). A novel hybrid CFO estimation scheme for UFMC-based systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 99, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mirza, G. K., Gabriel, P. V., Kentaro, I., et al. (2016). Throughput enhancement of multicarrier cognitive M2M networks: Universal-filtered OFDM systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), 830–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weitkemper, P., et al. (2016). Hardware experiments on multi-carrier waveforms for 5G. In 2016 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference, Doha, pp. 1–6.

  23. Ahmed, R., Wild, T., & Schaich, F. (2016). Coexistence of UF-OFDM and CP-OFDM. In IEEE vehicular technology conference, pp. 1–5.

  24. Lin, H. (2015). Flexible configured OFDM for 5G air interface. IEEE Access, 3, 1861–1870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schaich, F., & Wild, T. (2015). Subcarrier spacing—A neglected degree of freedom? In 2015 IEEE 16th international workshop on signal proc subcarrier spacing—processing advances in wireless communications (SPAWC), Stockholm, pp. 56–60.

  26. Schaich, F., Wild, T., & Ahmed, R. (2016). Subcarrier spacing—How to make use of this degree of freedom. In 2016 IEEE 83rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), Nanjing, pp. 15–18.

  27. Del Fiorentino, P., Vitiello, C., Lottici, V., Giannetti, F., & Luise, M. (2016). A robust resource allocation algorithm for packet BIC-UFMC 5G wireless communications. In 2016 24th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO), Budapest, pp. 843–847.

  28. Del Fiorentino, P., et al. (2016). Resource allocation in short packets BIC-UFMC transmission for internet of things. In 2016 IEEE globecom workshops (GC Wkshps), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1–6.

  29. Final 5GNOW Transceiver and frame structure concept D3.3, 5GNOW, Tech. Rep., 2015.

  30. Matthe, M., Zhang, D., Schaich, F., Wild, T., Ahmed, R., & Fettweis, G. (2016). A reduce complexity time-domain transmitter for UF-OFDM. In 2016 IEEE 83rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), Nanjing, pp. 1–5.

  31. Ali, M. A. A. (2016). 5G transceiver filters. In 2016 conference of basic sciences and engineering studies (SGCAC), Khartoum, pp. 121–126.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sirui Duan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, S., Yu, X. & Wang, R. Performance Analysis on Filter Parameters and Sub-bands Distribution of Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier. Wireless Pers Commun 95, 2359–2375 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4118-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4118-2

Keywords

Navigation