Abstract
Network virtualization (NV) has been successfully applied in wired networks, providing abstraction of the networking equipment and simplifying the network/resource management procedures. However, more light needs to be shed on how the emerging NV technologies, including software defined networking and network function virtualization, can be used by the mobile network operators to efficiently handle the ever-increasing demand for mobile data traffic. In this paper, we focus on the long term evolution system and present a NV-based framework that aims at bringing the access network closer to the end user. The proposed framework enables the dynamic sharing of base stations and radio resources among different mobile network operators, a.k.a. multi-tenant operation. Accordingly, we present novel NV triggering and decision algorithms to demonstrate how the proposed dynamic sharing of base stations can be deployed based on predefined service level agreements. Extensive system-level simulations accompany the paper, showing that, even with the use of simple NV triggering and decision algorithms, the proposed framework results in notable performance improvements at the users of the home operator, i.e. the sending operator, without significantly affecting the performance of the users at the host operator, i.e. the operator that shares its infrastructure.












Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gupta, A., & Jha, R. K. (2015). A survey of 5G network: Architecture and emerging technologies. Access, IEEE (vol. 3, pp. 1206–1232).
Bhushan, N., Li, J., Malladi, D., Gilmore, R., Brenner, D., Damnjanovic, A., et al. (2014). Network densification: The dominant theme for wireless evolution into 5G. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 52(2), 82–89.
GPP TS 23.251, “Network sharing; Architecture and functional description”, Rel. 13, Mar. 2015.
GPP TS 32.130, “Telecommunication management; Network sharing; Concepts and requirements”, Rel. 12, Dec. 2014.
Chowdhury, N. M. M. K., & Boutaba, R. (2009). Network virtualization: State of the art and research challenges. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 47(7), 20–26.
Costa-Perez, X., Swetina, J., Tao, G., Mahindra, R., & Rangarajan, S. (2013). Radio access network virtualization for future mobile carrier networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 51(7), 27–35.
O. M. E. Committee, “Software-defined Networking: The New Norm for Networks”, Open Networking Foundation, 2012.
“Network Functions Virtualisation-Introductory White Paper”, ETSI, October 2012.
Panchal, J. S., Yates, R. D., & Buddhikot, M. M. (2013). Mobile network resource sharing options: Performance comparisons. Transactions on Wireless Communications, IEEE, 12(9), 4470–4482.
Kiess, W., Weitkemper, P., & Khan, A. (2013). Base station virtualization for OFDM air interfaces with strict isolation. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Budapest.
Zaki, Y., Zhao, L., Görg, C., & Timm-Giel, A. (2011). Lte mobile network virtualization. Mobile Networks and Applications, 16(4), 424–432.
GPP - 5G Vision Brochure, available on-line at www.5g-ppp.eu.
Costanzo, S., Xenakis, D., Passas, N., & Merakos, L. (2014). OpeNB: A framework for virtualizing base stations in LTE networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Sydney.
Shrivastava, R., Costanzo, S., Samdanis, K., Xenakis, D., Grace, D., & Merakos, L. (2014) An SDN-based framework for elastic resource sharing in integrated FDD/TDD LTE-A HetNets. In IEEE international conference on cloud networking (CloudNet), Luxembourg.
Bradai, A., Singh, K., Ahmed, T., & Rasheed, T. (2015). Cellular software defined networking: A framework. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 53(6), 36–43.
Sama, M. R., Contreras, L. M., Kaippallimalil, J., Akiyoshi, I., Haiyang, Q., & Hui, N. (2015). Software-defined control of the virtualized mobile packet core. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 53(2), 107–115.
Nguyen, V. G., & Kim, Y. H. (2015). Proposal and evaluation of SDN based mobile packet core network. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, EURASIP, 1, 1–18.
McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., & Turner, J. (2008). OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. In Computer communication review, ACM SIGCOMM (vol. 38, pp. 2).
China Mobile Research Institute. (2011). C-RAN: The Road Towards Green RAN, White Paper, Version 2.5.
Gudipati, A., Perry, D., Li, L. E., & Katti, S. (2013). SoftRAN: Software defined radio access network, HotSDN, ACM SIGCOMM.
Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Merakos, L., & Verikoukis, C. (2014). Mobility management for Femtocells in LTE-advanced: Key aspects and survey of handover decision algorithms. In Communications Surveys and Tutorial, IEEE (vol. 16(1), pp. 64–91) First Quarter 2014.
Kuklinski, S., Yuhon, L., & Khoa, T. D. (2014) Handover management in SDN-based mobile networks. In IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Austin.
GPP TS 36.814, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects”, Rel. 9, Mar. 2010.
Piro, G., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., Capozzi, F., & Camarda, P. (2011). Simulating LTE cellular systems: An open source framework. In Transactions on Vehicular Technology, IEEE (Vol. 60, pp. 2).
OpenAirInterface. http://www.openairinterface.org.
Foukas, X., Nikaein, N., Kassem, M. M., Marina, M. K., & Kontovasilis, K. (2016). FlexRAN: A flexible and programmable platform for software-defined radio access networks. In ACM Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT), Dec. 2016.
Acknowledgements
This paper has been funded by the FP7 Marie Curie project CROSSFIRE (MITN 317126).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costanzo, S., Xenakis, D., Passas, N. et al. Augmented RAN with SDN Orchestration of Multi-tenant Base Stations. Wireless Pers Commun 96, 2009–2037 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4285-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4285-1