Abstract
In this paper, we propose and analyze an amplify-and-forward relaying energy harvesting system with Kth best partial relay selection and energy beamforming over Nakagami-m fading channels. The Kth best relay is selected based on criteria such as the Kth best first-hop channel gains (KBFC scheme) and the Kth best second-hop channel gains (KBSC scheme). Both the time-switching relaying and power-splitting relaying protocols are examined. To evaluate the system performance, we derive analytical expressions for the outage probability and throughput in both the delay-limited transmission (DLT) and delay-tolerant transmission (DTT) modes. Then the optimal values of these throughput are determined. The DLT mode is considered in two optimal cases: global-optimal DLT (GODLT), where an optimal pair of the source rate and energy-harvesting ratio is employed, and local-optimal DLT (LODLT), where only optimal energy-harvesting ratio is used. Monte Carlo simulations are presented to corroborate our analysis. The results in terms of throughput show the following. (1) For the LODLT mode, at relatively low SNRs, the KBSC scheme outperforms the KBFC scheme except for \(K=1\). (2) For the DTT and GODLT modes, the KBSC scheme is more efficient than the KBFC scheme at high values of K. (3) When the signal quality increases, the throughput for the DTT and GODLT modes is significantly enhanced, whereas that for the LODLT mode reaches an upper limit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nasir, A., Zhou, X., Durrani, S., & Kennedy, R. (2015). Wireless-powered relays in cooperative communications: Time-switching relaying protocols and throughput analysis. EEE Transactions on Communications, 63(5), 1607–1622.
Zhang, R., & Ho, C. K. (2013). MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(13), 1989–2001.
Lu, X., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2015). Wireless networks with RF energy harvesting: A contemporary survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 17(2), 757–789.
Gu, Y., & Aïssa, S. (2015). RF-based energy harvesting in decode-and-forward relaying systems: Ergodic and outage capacities. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(11), 6425–6434.
Zhong, C., Suraweera, H., Zheng, G., Krikidis, I., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Wireless information and power transfer with full duplex relaying. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(10), 3447–3461.
Zhou, X., Zhang, R., & Ho, C. K. (2013). Wireless information and power transfer: Architecture design and rateenergy tradeoff. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(11), 4754–4767.
Zhu, G., Zhong, C., Suraweera, H., Karagiannidis, G., Zhang, Z., & Tsiftsis, T. (2015). Wireless information and power transfer in relay systems with multiple antennas and interference. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 63(4), 1400–1418.
Xing, H., Wong, K. K., Nallanathan, A., & Zhang, R. (2016). Wireless powered cooperative jamming for secrecy multi-AF relaying networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(12), 7971–7984.
Duy, T. T., Duong, T., da Costa, D. B., Bao, V. N. Q., & Elkashlan, M. (2015). Proactive relay selection with joint impact of hardware impairment and co-channel interference. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 63(5), 1594–1606.
Krikidis, I., Thompson, J., Mclaughlin, S., & Goertz, N. (2008). Amplify-and-forward with partial relay selection. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(4), 235–237.
Son, P. N., & Kong, H. Y. (2015). Energy-harvesting relay selection schemes for decode-and-forward dual-hop networks. EICE Transactions on Communications, E98–B(12), 2485–2495.
Chong, E. K. P., & Zak, S. H. (2004). An introduction to optimization (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Gradshteyn, I., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2007). Table of integrals, series, and products (7th ed.). Cambridge: Academic Press.
Chauhan, S. S., & Kumar, S. (2015). Adaptive-transmission channel capacity of maximal-ratio combining with antenna selection in Nakagami-\(m\) fading channels. Wireless Personal Communications, 85(4), 2233–2243.
Nasir, A., Zhou, X., Durrani, S., & Kennedy, R. (2013). Relaying protocols for wireless energy harvesting and information processing. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(7), 3622–3636.
Aloqlah, M. S. (2015). Performance analysis of dual-hop fixed-gain relay systems over extended generalized-K fading channels. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(1), 619–630.
Olfat, E., & Olfat, A. (2014). Outage performance of hybrid decode–amplify–forward protocol with the nth best relay selection. Wireless Personal Communications, 78(2), 1403–1412.
Olver, F. W. J., Lozier, D. W., Boisvert, R. F., & Clark, C. W. (2010). NIST handbook of mathematical functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhu, G., Zhong, C., Suraweera, H. A., Zhang, Z., Yuen, C., & Yin, R. (2014). Ergodic capacity comparison of different relay precoding schemes in dual-hop AF systems with co-channel interferer. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(7), 23142328.
Wolfram Functions. http://functions.wolfram.com/PDF/MeijerG.pdf.
Funding
This work was supported by the 2017 Research Fund of University of Ulsan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Proof of Proposition 1
The tight lower bound of the outage probability of the proposed system can be calculated as
Substituting (14) into (31), we have
where \(z = \left( \left\| \mathbf{h }_1^{( K )} \right\| ^2 - \frac{\gamma }{{\mathbb {a}}_{[w]}} \right)\).
Before calculating the outage probability, we need to study the PDF and CDF of the Kth best order of gamma RVs. Consider L gamma RVs, \({\mathcal {X}}_1,\ldots ,{\mathcal {X}}_L\), with parameters \((m,\lambda )\), and the Kth best order RV is determined as \({\mathcal {X}}^{(K)}=Kth \mathop {\arg \max }\limits _{1 \leqslant l \leqslant L} ({\mathcal {X}}_l)\). According to [17], we can respectively obtain the PDF and CDF of \({\mathcal {X}}^{(K)}\) as follows.
1.1 Outage Probability for the KBFC Scheme
For the KBFC scheme, the PDF and CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) respectively follow (33) and (34) with parameters \((N_1m_1,\frac{\lambda _1}{m_1})\), the PDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) follows (1), and the CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) follows
with parameters \(\left( N_2m_2,\frac{\lambda _2}{m_2} \right)\) [14].
Substituting the PDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) and CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) into (32), and using the multinomial theorem given in [18, Eq. (26.4.9)], the outage probability for the KBFC scheme can be calculated as
The integration in (36) can be solved using [13, Eq.(3.471.9)]. Then \({\mathcal {P}}^{\text {low}}_{{\text {KBSC}},[w]}(\gamma )\) can be calculated as in (15).
1.2 Outage Probability for the KBSC Scheme
For the KBSC scheme, the PDF and CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) respectively follow (1) and (35) with parameters \((N_1m_1,\frac{\lambda _1}{m_1})\), and the PDF and CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) respectively follow (33) and (34) with parameters \((N_2m_2,\frac{\lambda _2}{m_2})\). Then, the outage probability for the KBSC scheme can be obtained with the same steps as in “Outage Probability for the KBFC Scheme” of Appendix 1.
This ends the proof for Proposition 1.
Appendix 2: Proof of Proposition 2
1.1 Ergodic Capacity for the KBFC Scheme
1.1.1 Calculation for \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{r,[w]}}\)
According to [19] and using the CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) for the KBFC scheme, \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{r,[w]}}\) can be calculated as
The integration in (37) can be solved using [13, Eq. (3.383.10)]; hence, \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{r,[w]}}\) can be expressed as
1.1.2 Calculation for \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{d,[w]}}\)
Letting \(Y= \Vert \mathbf{h }_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2 \Vert \mathbf{h }_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\), the PDF of Y for the KBFC scheme can be calculated as
Substituting the PDF of \(\Vert \mathbf{h }_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) and \(\Vert \mathbf{h }_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) for the KBFC scheme into (39), and with the help of [13, Eq. (3.471.9)], we have
where \(z=\frac{m_2m_1( K + n )y}{\lambda _1\lambda _2}\).
Then, \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{d,[w]}}\) can be calculated as
Substituting (40) into (41) and expressing \(\ln (1+x)=G_{2,2}^{1,2} \left( {x \big \vert _{1,0}^{1,1}} \right)\) [13, Eq. (07.34.03.0456.01)], we have
The integration in (42) can be solved using [13, Eq. (7.821.3)]; thus, \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{d,[w]}}\) can be expressed as
1.1.3 Calculation for \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{t,[w]}}^{ low }\)
For the KBFC scheme, \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{t,[w]}}^{\text {low}}\) can be determined by evaluating \({\mathbb {E}}\{\ln (\gamma _{r,[w]})\} =\ln ({\mathbb {a}}_{[w]}) +{\mathcal {A}}\) and \({\mathbb {E}}\{\ln (\gamma _{d,[w]})\} =\ln ({\mathbb {b}}_{[w]}) +{\mathcal {A}} +{\mathcal {D}}\), where \({\mathcal {A}}={\mathbb {E}}\{\ln ( \Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2 )\}\) and \({\mathcal {D}}={\mathbb {E}}\{\ln ( \Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2 )\}\). Using the PDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) and \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) given in “Outage Probability for the KBFC Scheme” of Appendix 1 , and with the help of [13, Eq. (4.352.1)], \({\mathcal {A}}\) can be expressed as in (26) and \({\mathcal {D}}\) is given by
From (23), \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{t,[w]}}^{\text {low}}\) can be calculated as
Substituting (38), (43), and (45) into (22), the analytical expression for the ergodic capacity of the KBFC scheme can be obtained.
1.2 Ergodic Capacity for the KBSC Scheme
According to the similar steps as in “Ergodic Capacity for the KBFC Scheme” of Appendix 2, and using the PDF and CDF of \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) and \(\Vert {\mathbf {h}}_2^{(K)} \Vert ^2\) for the KBSC scheme given in “Outage Probability for the KBSC Scheme” of Appendix 1, the analytical expressions of \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{r,[w]}}\), \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{d,[w]}}\), and \({\mathcal {C}}_{\gamma _{t,[w]}}^{\text {low}}\) for the KBSC scheme can be respectively expressed as follows:
where \({\mathcal {B}}={\mathbb {E}}\{\ln ( \Vert {\mathbf {h}}_1^{(K)} \Vert ^2 )\}\) given by (27).
Substituting (46), (47), and (48) into (22), the analytical expression for the ergodic capacity of the KBSC scheme can be obtained.
This ends the proof for Proposition 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuan, V., Kong, H.Y. Wireless Information and Power Transfer in Kth Best Relay Selection Systems with Energy Beamforming over Nakagami-m Fading Channels. Wireless Pers Commun 97, 4229–4249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4722-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4722-1