Abstract
In Heterogeneous Wireless Networks (HWN), seamless Vertical Handoff (VHO) to the best available network is significant in providing Quality of Experience to the Mobile Users. The selection of best available network is based on multiple contrasting handoff decision attributes along with their respective User Preferences. In literature, the user preferences used in various network selection techniques are pre-fixed i.e. static and arbitrary without any standard theoretical basis. This paper proposes a method to moderate these static user preferences on real time basis according to the current value of respective handoff decision attributes, to make them dynamic and realistic. The effect of Dynamic User Preferences on network selection for vertical handoff, is evaluated with the prominent Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) methods like Simple Additive Weighting, Multiplicative Exponential Weighting, Technique of Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution, and Grey Relational Analysis. Simulations are performed using both static user preference weights from the user and proposed dynamic user preference weights. The result of simulations shows that the number of vertical handoffs, needs to complete an application by a mobile user, using dynamic user preference weights is less in comparison to using static user preference weights for all considered MADM methods. This proves the effectiveness of the proposed dynamic user preferences in network selections to perform VHOs in HWNs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kellokoski, J., Koskinen, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2014). Always best connected heterogeneous network concept. Wireless Personal Communications, 75(1), 63–80.
Yan, X., AhmetŞekercioğlu, Y., & Narayanan, S. (2010). A survey of vertical handover decision algorithms in Fourth Generation heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Networks, 54(11), 1848–1863.
Ahmed, A., Boulahia, L. M., & Gaïti, D. (2014). Enabling vertical handover decisions in heterogeneous wireless networks: A state-of-the-art and a classification. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(2), 776–811.
Choo, E. U., Schoner, B., & Wedley, W. C. (1999). Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 37(3), 527–541.
Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507–529.
Wang, L., & Kuo, G.-S. G. S. (2013). Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks—a tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(1), 271–292.
Chandavarkar, B. R., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2016). Simplified and improved multiple attributes alternate ranking method for vertical handover decision in heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Communications, 83, 81–97.
Obayiuwana, E. & Falowo, O. E. (2016). Network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks using multi-criteria decision-making algorithms: A review. Wireless Networks. doi:10.1007/s11276-016-1301-4.
Goyal, P., & Saxena, S. (2008). A dynamic decision model for vertical handoffs across heterogeneous wireless networks. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 2(5), 1766–1771.
Márquez-Barja, J., Calafate, C. T., Cano, J. C., & Manzoni, P. (2011). An overview of vertical handover techniques: Algorithms, protocols and tools. Computer Communications, 34(8), 985–997.
Bari F. & Leung, V. (2007). Multi-attribute network selection by iterative TOPSIS for heterogeneous wireless access. In 4th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications Networking Conference CCNC (pp. 808–812).
Wang, L. & Binet, D. (2009). MADM-based network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: A simulation study, In 1st International Conference Wireless Communication Vehicular. Technology Information Theory Aerospace Electronic System Technology (pp. 559–564).
Senouci, M. A., Mushtaq, M. S., Hoceini, S., & Mellouk, A. (2016). TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection. Computer Networks, 0, 1–11.
Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. Research analysis corporation. Wiley, 234 p.
Ghahfarokhi, B. S., & Movahhedinia, N. (2013). A personalized QoE-aware handover decision based on distributed reinforcement learning. Wireless networks, 19(8), 1807–1828.
Abdullah, R. M., Abdullah, A., Hamid, N. A. W. A., Othman, M., & Subramaniam, S. (2014). A network selection algorithm based on enhanced access router discovery in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wireless personal communications, 77(3), 1733–1750.
Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Yang, L. T., Li, T., & Lv, X. (2014). User preference heterogeneous network selection in less subjective ways. Wireless Personal Communications, 76(4), 813–828.
Smaoui, I., Zarai, F., Banat, M. M., & Kamoun, L. (2010). Heterogeneous wireless networks: Configuration and vertical handoff management. Wireless Personal Communications, 54(3), 417–445.
Bao, W., & Liang, B. (2015). Stochastic geometric analysis of user mobility in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(10), 2212–2225.
Chinnappan, A., & Balasubramanian, R. (2016). Complexity–consistency trade-off in multi-attribute decision making for vertical handover in heterogeneous wireless networks. IET Networks, 5(1), 13–21.
Kustiawan, I., & Chi, K. (2015). Handoff decision using a Kalman filter and fuzzy logic in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(12), 2258–2261.
Zhu, J., Xu, L., Yang, L., & Xie, W. (2015). An optimal vertical handoff decision algorithm for multiple services with different priorities in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(1), 527–549.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goyal, P., Lobiyal, D.K. & Katti, C.P. Dynamic User Preference Based Network Selection for Vertical Handoff in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 98, 725–742 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4892-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4892-x