Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design and Performance Comparison of W-OFDM Under the Nonlinear HPA Environment

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the spectral efficiency improvement of wireless and cellular communications is very important. Several waveforms have been proposed in order to satisfy key performance indicators of the 5th generation (5G) cellular communication. Universal filtered multi-carrier (UFMC) and filter bank multi-carrier (FBMC) and the filtered orthogonal frequency division multiplexing are typical candidate for 5G waveform, but they have some advantages and problems as well. In this paper, a weighted orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (W-OFDM) is considered since W-OFDM has pretty low complexity and comparable merits. In this paper, at first, we describe the system model and operation principle about UFMC, FBMC, and W-OFDM system. Next, we evaluate the out-of-band (OOB) power spectrum and bit error rate (BER) performance of these systems in the linear or nonlinear HPA. Simulation results show that OOB power spectrum and BER performance of UFMC, FBMC, and W-OFDM are similar in the linear operation. From the implementation point of view, if these performance and characteristics are similar, low-complexity is very decisive for the communication processing speed that is very important to the low latency and ultra-fast processing in the receiver. Additionally, under the nonlinear HPA environment, W-OFDM system is more advantageous because W-OFDM system uses a simple time-domain windowing technique in order to reduce OOB power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahlman, E., Mildh, G., Parkvall, S., Peisa, J., Sachs, J., Selén, Y., et al. (2014). 5G wireless access: Requirements and realization. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 52(12), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shanzhi Chen; Jian Zhao. (2014). The requirements, challenges, and technologies for 5G of terrestrial mobile telecommunication. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 52(5), 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banelli, P., et al. (2014). Modulation formats and waveforms for the physical layer of 5G wireless networks: Who will be the heir of OFDM? arXiv:1407.5947, July 2014.

  4. Wunder, G., et al. (2014). 5GNOW: Non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaich, F., & Wild, T. (2014). Waveform contenders for 5G—OFDM vs. FBMC vs. UFMC. In 2014 6th international symposium on communications, control and signal processing (ISCCSP) (pp. 457–460). May 21–23, 2014.

  6. Berardinelli, G., Pajukoski, K., Lahetkangas, E., Wichman, R., Tirkkonen, O., & Mogensen, P. (2014). On the potential of OFDM enhancements as 5G waveforms. In 2014 IEEE 79th vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), Seoul (pp. 1–5).

  7. Mahmoud, H., Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). OFDM for cognitive radio: Merits and challenges. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 16(2), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vakilian, V., Wild, T., Schaich, F., ten Brink, S., & Frigon, J.-F. (2013). Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE. In 2013 IEEE GLOBECOM workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 223–228, 9–13).

  9. Mukherjee, M., Shu, L., Kumar, V., Kumar, P., & Matam, R. (2015). Reduced out-of-band radiation-based filter optimization for UFMC systems in 5G. In 2015 international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 1150–1155). Aug 24–28, 2015.

  10. Farhang-Boroujeny, B. (2011). OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 28(3), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wonsuk C., Beomju K., Moonchang C., Hyungju N., Hyunkyu Y., Sooyoung C., & Daesik H. (2014). Synchronization error in QAM-based FBMC system. In 2014 IEEE military communications conference (MILCOM) (pp. 699–705).

  12. Ramesh Reddy, B., et al. (2009). The effect of exponential/cosine Hyperbolic/Polynomial/Kaiser window parameters cg-icg-enbw-sl on the SNR improvement of MST radar signals. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2(8), 282–290.

  13. Stryhalyuk, B., Yaremko, O., Maksymyuk, T., & Melnyk, O. (2012). Performance increasing method of wireless system based on determining time-frequency localization properties of OFDM signal. ECONTECHMOD: An International Quarterly Journal, 1(3), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Drotar, P., Gazda, J., Kocur, D., & Galajda, P. (2008). MC-CDMA performance analysis for different spreading codes at HPA Saleh model. In 18th international conference on radioelektronika, Prague (pp. 1–4).

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Education) (No. 2016R1D1A1B01008046).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heung-Gyoon Ryu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, C., Ryu, HG. Design and Performance Comparison of W-OFDM Under the Nonlinear HPA Environment. Wireless Pers Commun 98, 983–999 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4904-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4904-x

Keywords

Navigation