Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PEAL: Power Efficient and Adaptive Latency Hierarchical Routing Protocol for Cluster-Based WSN

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In wireless sensor networks, one of the most important constraints is the low power consumption requirement. For that reason, several hierarchical or cluster-based routing methods have been proposed to provide an efficient way to save energy during communication. However, their main challenge is to have efficient mechanisms to achieve the trade-off between increasing the network lifetime and accomplishing acceptable transmission latency. In this paper, we propose a novel protocol for cluster-based wireless sensor networks called PEAL (Power Efficient and Adaptive Latency). Our simulation results show that PEAL can extend the network lifetime about 47% compared to the classic protocol LEACH (Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy) and introduces an acceptable transmission latency compared to the energy conservation gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. That means the distance between the CH that send the advertisement and the non-cluster head sensor node is so close.

References

  1. Duan, S., & Yuan, X. (2006). Exploring hierarchy architecture for wireless sensor networks management. In IFIP international conference on wireless and optical communications networks, p. 6, 11–13.

  2. Nassr, M., Jangeun, J., Eidenbenz, S., & Mielke, A. (2007). Scalable and reliable sensor network routing: Performance study from field deployment. In 26th IEEE international conference on computer communications, pp. 670–678.

  3. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Heidemann, J. S., & Kumar, S. (1999). Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks. In Mobile computing and networking, Seattle, WA USA, pp. 263–270.

  5. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In IEEE Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp. 1–7.

  6. Lee, S., Noh, Y., & Kim, K. (2013). Key schemes for security enhanced TEEN routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2013, 8. doi:10.1155/2013/391986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. (2002). PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 3, 1125–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boubiche, D., & Bilami, A. (2012). Cross layer intrusion detection system for wireless sensor network. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), 4(2), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, G., & Krishnamachari, B. (2007). Minimum latency joint scheduling and routing in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 5, 832–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, H., et al. (2011). Latency-minimizing data aggregation in wireless sensor networks under physical interference model. Ad Hoc Networks. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.12.004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1, 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qing, L., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29, 2230–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fengjun, S. (2008). A distributed clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Science, 13(4), 385–390. doi:10.1007/s11859-008-0401-0.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Abuhelaleh, M., Elleithy, K., Mismar, T. (2010). Modified LEACH—Energy efficient wireless networks communication. In T. Sobh, et al. (Eds.), Novel algorithms and techniques in telecommunications and networking, Springer, pp 123–127. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3662-9_20.

  15. Benihssane, A., Hasnaoui, M. L., Saadi, M., Benkirane, S., & Laghdir, M. (2010). Equitable leach-E protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In M. Essaaidi et al. (Eds.), Intelligent distributed computing IV, SCI 315 (pp. 171–176). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Boubiche, D., & Bilami, A. (2011). HEEP (Hybrid Energy Efficiency Protocol) based on chain clustering. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 10(1/2), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Biradar, R. V., Sawant, S. R., Mudholkar, R. R., & Patil, V. C. (2011). Multihop routing in self-organizing wireless sensor networks. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 8(1), 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Homero Toral-Cruz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hidoussi, F., Toral-Cruz, H., Boubiche, D.E. et al. PEAL: Power Efficient and Adaptive Latency Hierarchical Routing Protocol for Cluster-Based WSN. Wireless Pers Commun 96, 4929–4945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4963-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4963-z

Keywords

Navigation