Skip to main content
Log in

Zadoff–Chu Sequence Based Timing Offset Estimation for OFDM Systems

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, timing synchronization in OFDM is attained with the help of Zadoff–Chu sequence as a training symbol. An algorithm based on the cross-correlation property of fractional Fourier transform (FRFT) is proposed to generate a new timing metric. In this algorithm, cross correlation of received signal and Z–Chu sequence is taken at the receiver side in FRFT domain. The mathematical analysis of proposed estimator has been done and the variance of timing metric is obtained under the effect of AWGN channel. The simulation result shows that the variance of timing metric decreases as signal to noise ratio increases. The mean and MSE of the timing offset is simulated under HYPERLAN indoor channel (type-A). The proposed estimation method has been compared with existing methods and established as a better method to combat timing offset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prasad, R., & Hara, S. (2003). Multicarrier techniques for 4G mobile communications. Boston: Universal Personal Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joshi, H. D., & Saxena, R. (2013). OFDM and its major concerns: A study with way out. IETE Journal of Education, 54(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidl, T. M., & Cox, D. C. (1997). Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 45(12), 1613–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park, B., Cheon, H., Kang, C., & Hong, D. (2003). A novel timing estimation method for OFDM systems. IEEE Communication Letters, 7(5), 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi, K., & Serpedin, E. (2004). Coarse frame and carrier synchronization of OFDM systems: a new metric and comparison. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(4), 1271–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Awoseyila, A. B., Kasparis, C., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Improved preamble-aided timing estimation for OFDM systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(11), 825–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sahu, B., Chakrabarti, S., & Maskara, S. L. (2010). A new timing synchronization metric for OFDM based WLAN systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 52(4), 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, A. K., & Saxena, R. (2011). Correlation theorem for fractional Fourier transform. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 4(2), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumari, S., Kr, S., Rai, A. Kumar, Joshi, H. D., Singh, A. K., & Saxena, R. (2013). Exact BER analysis of FRFT–OFDM system over frequency selective rayleigh fading channel with CFO. Electronics Letters, 49(20), 1299–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gul, M., Lee, S. & Ma, X. (2012). Robust synchronization for OFDM employing Zadoff–Chu sequence. In Proceedings of 46th CISS (pp. 1–6) doi: 10.1109/CISS.2012.6310837.

  11. Tao, R., Li, X. M., & Wang, Y. (2009). Time delay estimation of chirp signals in the fractional Fourier domain. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57(7), 2852–2855.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Pei, S. C., & Ding, J. J. (2000). Closed-form discrete fractional and affine Fourier transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 48(5), 1338–1353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, A. K., & Saxena, R. (2012). On convolution and product theorems for FRFT. Wireless Personal Communications, 65(1), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, A. K., & Saxena, R. (2011). Recent developments in FRFT, DFRFT with their applications in signal and image processing. Recent Patents on Engineering, 5(2), 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Papoulis, (1965). Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Walpole, R., & Myers, R. (1985). Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. New York: Macmillan.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Prasad, R., & Van Nee, R. (2000). OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications. Boston: Universal Personal Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Channel Models for HIPERLAN/2 in Different Indoor Scenarios (1998), ETSI BRAN 3ERI085B.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashutosh Kumar Singh.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

From Sect. 5, the mean square error of the proposed timing metric is calculated in terms of \(I_{1} , I_{2} , I_{3}\) and \(I_{4}\) using formulae \(Var(XY) = E(X)^{2} E(Y)^{2} - \left( {E(X)} \right)^{2} \left( {E(Y)} \right)^{2}\) as given in (13) where \(I_{1}\) is considered as fourth moment of the received signal in FRFT domain denoted by (14). After expanding (14) into (15), the equation can be re-written as

$$= \underbrace {{E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto ,l} (u)} \right|^{4} } \right]}}_{A} + \underbrace {{E\left[ {\left| {W_{ \propto ,l} (u)} \right|^{4} } \right]}}_{B} + \underbrace {{6E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto ,l} (u)} \right|^{2} \left| {W_{ \propto ,l} (u)} \right|^{2} } \right]}}_{C}$$
(24)

where part A is the fourth moment of transmitted signal, part B is the fourth moment of AWGN noise and part C is the expectation of product of these two independent terms.

The fourth moment of transmitted signal can be calculated as follows

$$E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)} \right|^{4} } \right] = E\left\{ {\left| {aA_{ \propto } e^{{i2\pi K\left( {\tau \sin \propto } \right)^{2} }} e^{{i\tau^{2} \sin \propto \cos \propto /2}} } \right|^{4} } \right\}$$
(25)

The above equation can be written after calculating the value of \(\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)\) as given below. According to the modulation property defined in FRFT, if a signal is delayed by τ, then its FRFT can be calculated as

$$\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) = B_{ \propto } X_{ \propto } (u - \tau \cos \propto )$$
(26)

where \(B_{ \propto } = exp\left[ {{\text{i}}\tau^{2} \sin \propto \cos \propto /2 - {\text{i}}u\tau \sin \propto } \right]\) and \(\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)\) is the FRFT of delayed signal. Using the formula for the calculation of FRFT given in [11], the above equation can be written as

$$\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) = B_{ \propto } A_{ \propto } \mathop \smallint \limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } x(t)e^{{j\frac{{\left( {u - \tau cos \propto } \right)^{2} + t^{2} }}{2}\cot \propto }} e^{ - j(u - \tau \cos \propto )t\csc \propto } dt$$
(27)

where \(A_{ \propto } = \sqrt {1/2\pi \sin \propto }\) and \(x(t)\) is the transmitted chirp signal given in (1). After substituting the value of \(x(t)\) in above equation, it can be re-written as

$$\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) = B_{ \propto } A_{ \propto } a\mathop \smallint \limits_{ - T/2}^{T/2} e^{{j\pi Kt^{2} }} e^{{j\frac{{\left( {u - \tau cos \propto } \right)^{2} + t^{2} }}{2}\cot \propto }} e^{ - j(u - \tau \cos \propto )t\csc \propto } dt$$
(28)

As given in Tao et al. [11], the magnitude of FRFT is concentrated maximally at \(u = \tau \cos \propto\) according to (26). Thus using the relation given in (4), the above equation is reduced into following expression

$$\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) = B_{ \propto } A_{ \propto } aT$$
(29)

Substitute the value of \(B_{ \propto }\) in above equation, we get

$$\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) = aA_{ \propto } Te^{{i2\pi K\left( {\tau \sin \propto } \right)^{2} }} e^{{i\tau^{2} \sin \propto \cos \propto /2}}$$
(30)

Assume unity time interval (T = 1)

$$\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) = aA_{ \propto } e^{{i2\pi K\left( {\tau \sin \propto } \right)^{2} }} e^{{i\tau^{2} \sin \propto \cos \propto /2}}$$
(31)

Substitute the value of \(\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)\) in \(E[|\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)|^{4} ]\), we can determine the fourth moment of transmitted delayed signal. Thus (25) reduces into following equation

$$E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)} \right|^{4} } \right] = a^{4} |A_{ \propto } |^{4}$$
(32)

In part B, the fourth moment of AWGN noise is calculated using formula \(E[X^{P} ] = \sigma^{P} (P - 1)!!\) if p is even. For this we need to calculate the second moment of noise signal. After solving the second moment and some mathematical manipulation, the value of \(E[|W_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} ]\) comes out to be [11]

$$E[|W_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} ] = |A_{ \propto } |^{2} \sigma_{0}^{2}$$
(33)

Using above equation, we can calculate the value of \(E[|W_{ \propto } (u)|^{4} ]\) using given formula.

$$\begin{aligned} E[|W_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} ] = |A_{ \propto } |^{4} \sigma_{0}^{4} (4 - 1)!! \hfill \\ E[|W_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} ] = 3|A_{ \propto } |^{4} \sigma_{0}^{4} \hfill \\ \end{aligned}$$
(34)

Part C can be calculated by taking expectation of their individual terms as follows

$$6E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)} \right|^{2} |W_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} } \right] = 6*E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)} \right|^{2} } \right]*E[|W_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} ]$$
(35)

The value of \(E[|\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u)|^{2} ]\) can be calculated in the same way as in (32) and using (33), we can re-write the above equation as

$$6E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto } \left( u \right)} \right|^{2} \left| {W_{ \propto } \left( u \right)} \right|^{2} } \right] = 6*\left( {a^{2} \left| {A_{ \propto } } \right|^{2} } \right)*\left( {\left| {A_{ \propto } } \right|^{2} \sigma_{0}^{2} } \right)$$
(36)

Substitute (32), (33) and (36) into (24), we get

$$I_{1} = E[|R_{ \propto ,d} (u)|^{4} ] = a^{4} |A_{ \propto } |^{4} + 3|A_{ \propto } |^{4} \sigma_{0}^{4} + 6a^{4} |A_{ \propto } |^{4} \sigma_{0}^{2}$$
(37)

Similarly \(I_{2}\) represents the fourth moment of transmitted signal and using (32), it can be expressed as

$$I_{2} = E[|X_{ \propto ,l} (u)|^{4} ] = a^{4} |A_{ \propto } |^{4}$$
(38)

\(I_{3}\) represents the square of second moment of received signal and can be written as

$$I_{3} = \left( {E[|R_{ \propto ,d} (u)|^{2} ]} \right)^{2} = \left( {E\left\{ {\left[ {\tilde{X}_{ \propto } (u) + W_{ \propto } (u)} \right]^{2} } \right\}} \right)^{2}$$
(39)

Expanding (39) into following expression

$$= \left( {E\left[ {\left| {\tilde{X}_{ \propto ,l} \left( u \right)} \right|^{2} } \right] + E\left[ {\left| {W_{ \propto } \left( u \right)} \right|^{2} } \right]} \right)^{2}$$
(40)

Using (36), (40) further reduces into

$$\left( {a^{2} |A_{ \propto } |^{2} + |A_{ \propto } |^{2} \sigma_{0}^{2} } \right)^{2}$$
(41)

and \(I_{4}\) represents the square of second moment of transmitted signal and it can be written as

$$I_{4} = \left( {E[|X_{ \propto ,d} (u)|^{2} ]} \right)^{2} = \left( {a^{2} |A_{ \propto } |^{2} } \right)^{2}$$
(42)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaushal, Y., Joshi, H.D., Singh, A.K. et al. Zadoff–Chu Sequence Based Timing Offset Estimation for OFDM Systems. Wireless Pers Commun 98, 2657–2671 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4993-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4993-6

Keywords

Navigation