Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Evaluation of EUTRAN LTE Handover for High-Speed Vehicle

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seamless connectivity of the user equipment (UE) with an LTE base station is an important challenge which impacts the network performance. The network resource for handover procedure is controlled through different handover algorithms. These algorithms work on two aspects, that is power margin and quality of the reference signals. In this paper, we study and evaluate the performance of both algorithms on a typical experimental setup (using network simulator-3) with a different UE mobility scenario. The performance evaluation was performed under a set of key performance indicator i.e. throughput and hand over counts. In simulation results, we found that margin based algorithm offers better performance while comparing with the quality-based algorithm in terms of system throughput.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan, M.-S., Lin, T.-M., & Chen, W.-T. (2015). An enhanced handover scheme for mobile relays in LTE-A high-speed rail networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(2), 743–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Sousa, V. A., De O. Neto, R. A., De S. Chaves, F., Cardoso, L. S., & Cavalcanti, F. R. P. (2006). Access selection with anticipatory vertical handover for multi-access networks. In The 17th annual IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC’06), no. 1-4244-0330-8/06.

  3. Han, D., Shin, S., Cho, H., Chung, J.-M., Ok, D., & Hwang, I. (2015). Measurement and stochastic modeling of handover delay and interruption time of smartphone real-time applications on LTE networks. In IEEE communications magazine (pp. 173–181).

  4. Osti, P., Lassila, P., Aalto, S., Larmo, A., & Tirronen, T. (2014). Analysis of PDCCH performance for M2M traffic in LTE. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(9), 4357–4371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Capozzi, F., Piro, G., Grieco, L., Boggia, G., & Camarda, P. (2013). Downlink packet scheduling in LTE cellular networks: Key design issues and a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(2), 678–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2016). Performance analysis of MAC scheduler in LTE (EUTRAN) for “ASAR”: Resource allocation. In Next generation mobile applications, services and technologies (NGMAST 2016), Cardiff, UK.

  7. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2017). Comparative performance analysis of different resource scheduler and characterizing the impact of proportional fair under different TTI feedback delay in EUTRA network. International Journal of Mobile Network Design and Innovation, 7(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2016). Performance analysis of proportional fair MAC scheduler under varying feedback delay in EUTRAN. International Journal of Communications, 4(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2016). Strategy for resource allocation in LTE-A. In IEEE international conference on signal processing, communication, power and embedded system (SCOPES)-2016. Centurion University of Technology and Management (CUTM), Paralakhemundi Campus, Orissa, India.

  10. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2017). Performance analysis of optimized proportional fair media access control scheduler in evolved UMTS radio access (EUTRA) network. Wireless Personal Communication. doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4919-3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2017). Performance analysis of up-link adaptation in EUTRAN. Actapress Journal International Journal of Communications, 5(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muñoz, P., Barco, R., & Fortes, S. (2014). Conflict resolution between load balancing and handover optimization in LTE. IEEE Communications Letters, 18(10), 1795–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirsal, Y. (2016). Analytical modelling of a new handover algorithm for improve allocation of resources in highly mobile environments. International Journal of Computers Communications and Control, 11(6), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saxena, A., & Sindal, R. (2017). An optimized LTE handover model on quality and margin, with key performance indicator. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4979-4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E-UTRA 3GPP TS 36.331 E-UTRA radio resource control (RRC) protocol specification. [Online]. http://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/36331.htm. Accessed June 06, 2016.

  16. NSNAM. [Online]. https://www.nsnam.org/docs/models/html/lte-design.html.

  17. 3. T.-R. WG145. (2006). System analysis of the impact of CQI reporting period in DLSIMO OFDMA (R1-061506). 3GPP, Shanghai, China, May 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankit Saxena.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saxena, A., Sindal, R. Performance Evaluation of EUTRAN LTE Handover for High-Speed Vehicle. Wireless Pers Commun 98, 2837–2848 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5003-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5003-8

Keywords

Navigation