Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Motivation and Crowdfunding Success Based on Qualitative Analysis-Based on Kickstarer Website Data

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The entrepreneurial motivation is divided into extrinsic rewards motivation, intrinsic rewards motivation and motivation of taking social responsibility from the perspective of proself and prosocial as well as egoism and altruism. Using the information and data of 300 startup technology companies on the kickstarer website as an example, the research studies the relationship between entrepreneurial motivation and crowdfunding success through qualitative analysis and multiple regression. Extrinsic rewards motivation and motivation of taking social responsibility have positive effects on actual amount and backers, but has negative effect on the proportion of actual amount and target amount. When extrinsic rewards motivation and intrinsic rewards motivation work together, extrinsic rewards motivation has negative effect on crowdfunding success, while intrinsic rewards motivation has significantly positive effect on crowdfunding success, with backers preferring startups with intrinsic rewards motivation and no extrinsic rewards motivation. And when startups in start-up technology businesses have both intrinsic rewards motivation and motivation of taking social responsibility, intrinsic rewards motivation has a positive impact on crowdfunding success, while motivation of taking social responsibility has had insignificant impact on crowdfunding success. When the three motivations worked together, intrinsic rewards motivation positively influenced crowdfunding success, while the extrinsic rewards motivation and the motivation of taking social responsibility had a negative impact on the success of the crowdfunding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shane, S., Edwin, A. L., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 2, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Naffziger, D. W. (1997). An examination of owner’s goals in sustaining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robichaud, Y., Egbert, M., & Roger, A. (2001). Toward the development of a measuring instrument for entrepreneurial motivation. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki, K., Kim, S. H., & Bae, Z. T. (2002). Entrepreneurship in Japan and silicon valley: a comparative study. Technovation, 22(10), 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, K. J., & Lei, J. X. (2012). The research on the entrepreneurial motivation of university students based on the achievement goal theory. Studies in Science of Science, 30(8), 1221–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, Z. D., & Chen, W. J. (2017). An empirical relationship research among entrepreneurial traits, entrepreneurial motivation and entrepreneurial growth for college students. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 34(2), 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Y. J. (2017). The literature review on the motivation of sustainable entrepreneurship: Based on the proself and prosocial perspective. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 1, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2016). When does subordinate’s ingratiation behavior matter? The function of prosocial motivation and perspective taking. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 30(1), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2017). The research on the relationship between employees’ perceived corporate social responsibility and counterproductive work behavior: From prosocial motivation and intrinsic motivation perspective. Forecasting, 36(5), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, Z. C. (2011). Research on the influences of prosocial behavior on firms’ development. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shaker, Z., & Eric, G. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, H. B. (2010). Social entrepreneurship motivation, opportunity recognition and decision making mechanism study. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, Z. C., & Ren, Z. Z. (2016). The dual symbiosis phenonme nenon and its guiding principle of college students’ entrepreneurial motivation. Journal of Higher Education Management, 10(05), 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiqi Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Qin, Y., Zhao, X. et al. Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Motivation and Crowdfunding Success Based on Qualitative Analysis-Based on Kickstarer Website Data. Wireless Pers Commun 102, 1723–1734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5230-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5230-z

Keywords

Navigation