Skip to main content
Log in

Traffic State Estimation of Signalized Intersections Based on Stacked Denoising Auto-Encoder Model

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To solve the problem of fuzziness and uncertainty of traffic states in signalized intersection, a method was proposed for estimating traffic condition based on stacked de-noising auto-encoder model. The simulation data and empirical data were used to train the model, and the K-means clustering method was used to determine the traffic state thresholds and the data were divided into three categories based on the threshold values. Relevant features based on the reconstruction theory of de-noising auto-encoder were automatically extracted, and unsupervised greedy layer-wise pre-training and supervised fine-tuning were utilized to train the deep auto-encoder network, so that it had good robust performance on obtaining the traffic state characters with low quality in the complex environment. From the experimental results, the proposed method obtains an accuracy of 91.5% in simulation data and 88% in empirical data, which is better by 7.1% than using decision tree model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu, X., & Liu, H. X. (2011). A shockwave profile model for traffic flow on congested urban arterials. Transportation Research Part B, 45(10), 1768–1786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang, K. S., Mei, Y., & Li, K. P. (2014). A simulation-based evaluation of traffic state estimation accuracy by using floating car data in complex road networks. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 09, 1347–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levin, M., & Krause, G. M. (1978). Incident detection: A Bayesian approach (pp. 52–58). Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Record.

  4. Xu, T., Yang, X. G., Xu, A. G., & Zhang, M. (2011). Urban road traffic state estimation based on data fusion. Computer Engineering and Applications, 47(07), 218–221.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, F. B., & Sun, M. (2006). A method of traffic state estimation based on fuzzy cluster. Microcomputer Application, 22(02), 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, C. J., Shao, C. F., Zhuge, C. X., & Li, H. X. (2013). Estimating traffic flow models for urban expressway based on measurement data. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 13(3), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L., Yang, W., & Liu, T. (2014). A Naive Bayesian classifier-based algorithm for freeway traffic incident detection. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 42(4), 558–563.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, W., Hong, H., Li, M., Hu, W., Song, G., & Xie, K. (2013). Deep architecture for traffic flow prediction advanced data mining and applications (pp. 165–176). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, X., Yu, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2014). Large-scale transportation network congestion evolution prediction using deep learning theory. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0119044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niu, X., Zhu, Y., Cao, Q., Zhao, L., & Xie, W. (2015). A novel urban traffic prediction mechanism for smart city using learning approach. In L. Sun, H. Ma, D. Fang, J. Niu & W. Wang (Eds.), Advances in wireless sensor networks (Vol. 501, pp. 548–557). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hong, H., Huang, W., Song, G., & Xie, K. (2014). Metric-based multi-task grouping neural network for traffic flow forecasting. In Advances in neural networks—ISNN 2014 (pp. 499–507).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tan, J., & Wang, S. (2015). Research on prediction model for traffic congestion based on deep learning. Application Research of Computers, 32(10), 2951–2954.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yin, S. L., & Zhao, Y. N. (2015). Practice and research on deep learning applied in urban traffic flow prediction. Modern Electronics Technique, 38(15), 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786), 504–507.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Lajoie, I., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P. A. (2010). Stacked de-noising auto-encoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local de-noising criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(6), 3371–3408.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Breiman, L., & Friedman, J. H. (1984). Classification and regression trees (wadsworth statistics/probability). Biometrics, 40(3), 358.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junping Xiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, J., Chen, Z. Traffic State Estimation of Signalized Intersections Based on Stacked Denoising Auto-Encoder Model. Wireless Pers Commun 103, 625–638 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5466-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5466-2

Keywords

Navigation